Skip to content

Republican · Kentucky Senate, district 36

Serving since Jan 1, 2015KY 2025–26 session

Portrait of Julie Adams, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
$636.6K
in itemized contributions in the 2026 cycle, in the top 5% of State Senate Republicans

The median for State Senate Republicans is $46.2K. Ranks 47th of 936, where 1st raised the most. 383 itemized donors.

Itemized contributions reported to the state in the 2026 cycle, ranked among State Senate Republicans. State filings leave small gifts out, and totals depend on whether the seat is up this cycle.

At a glance

5 measures against State Senate Republicans. Adams voted against the majority of Kentucky Senate Republicans 12 times; party unity 93.4%, in the bottom quarter of the Kentucky Senate (average 95.3%). Adams missed 5.1% of 803 roll calls, attendance in the bottom quarter of the Kentucky Senate (average 97.0%).

The measures on which Adams sits furthest from the middle of State Senate Republicans, each against the same group, with the CSIP score when there is one. Every number is explained in its own section below.

Itemized, 2026

$636.6K

State Senate Republicans’ median $46.2K · ranks 47th of 936

Party unity

93.4%

Kentucky Senate average 95.3% · ranks 33rd of 38 · 12 votes against the majority of Kentucky Senate Republicans

Attendance

94.8%

Kentucky Senate average 97.0% · ranks 29th of 38 · 803 roll calls

From Kentucky, 2026

87%

Of itemized individual dollars · ranks 624th of 860 State Senate Republicans

CSIP ideology

+0.35

More liberal than 51% of State Senate Republicans · ± 0.05

Statements

No statements in this window

Peer group: State Senate Republicans. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; the thick bar is Adams, the thin grey bar the peer average. The headline is the measure on which Adams is most unusual among peers (Methods, §08).

Back to topNext: What politicians say

What Adams says

No statements for the KY 2025–26 session.No classified statements (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) in this time window.

Back to topNext: Policy

Policy

No policy statements for the KY 2025–26 session.No classified statements (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) in this time window.

Back to topNext: Ideology

Ideology

Adams sits at +0.35 on the CSIP scale, right of 0, more liberal than 51% of State Senate Republicans. Approximate range +0.30 to +0.39, which understates the uncertainty; from 481 donors and 427 roll calls.

CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official, federal and state, on one left–right scale, estimated from roll-call votes, who gives money to whom, and the text of statements. Negative is left of 0, positive right of it; 0 is the centre of the scale, not a definition of “moderate”.

+0.35

CSIP ideal point

Approximate range +0.30 to +0.39. From 481 donors and 427 roll calls. Run 2026-10-25T215945. Blue is left of 0, red right of 0.

← More liberalMore conservative →0Adams +0.3State Senate Republicans +0.4Kentucky Senate +0.5All State Senate +0.1

The outlined dot is Adams, coloured by its side of 0 (blue left, red right, deeper further out); the bar through it is the approximate range (±1.96 standard errors), which understates the uncertainty; the grey ticks below are the medians of Adams’s groups. 0 is the centre of the scale, not “moderate” by definition.

What this means, and what it doesn’t

The score summarises how an official votes, who funds them and how they talk, relative to everyone else. It does not grade positions as good or bad, and two officials with the same score can differ on any single issue. The ± range is 1.96 standard errors, which understates the uncertainty: scores whose ranges overlap may not differ at all, and even scores whose ranges do not overlap may not differ.

Where Adams sits

Every official in each group, on the CSIP scale

−2.0−1.00.0+1.0+2.0← More liberalMore conservative →State Senate Republicansmedian +0.4Adams +0.3Kentucky Senatemedian +0.5All State Senatemedian +0.1
Show the data
Adams's CSIP score of +0.35 placed against State Senate Republicans, Kentucky Senate, All State Senate.
GroupOfficialsMedianShare left of Adams
State Senate Republicans1083+0.449%
Kentucky Senate38+0.526%
All State Senate1909+0.171%
How to read the strips

Every small dot is one official on the same scale, coloured by its own score (blue left of 0, red right of 0, grey at 0, deeper further out) and spread up and down only to keep dots apart; where a group is crowded the dots overlap, and darker patches mean more officials. The large outlined dot is Adams in every row; the rule is each group’s median. The table under the figure gives the share of each group to the left of Adams.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Adams reported $636.6K in the 2026 cycle, 13.8 times the State Senate Republicans’ median of $46.2K. State filings report no small-donation total. 87% of itemized individual money came from Kentucky.

Campaign money from state campaign-finance filings, as aggregates only; the lab never shows an individual donor. Campaigns must report by name every person who gives them more than $200 in a cycle (“itemized”); smaller gifts are reported only as one total (“unitemized”), so donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations describe itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift total, so these figures add up itemized contributions only.

Election cycle
$636.6K

itemized in the 2026 cycle

From 383 itemized donors. State Senate Republicans’ median $46.2K.

Where the money came from

Each square is one percent of itemized contributions in the 2026 cycle.

Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)Individuals (itemized): $476.2K (74.8%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)PACs and other committees: $160.4K (25.2%)
  • Individuals (itemized)75 squares$476.2K
  • PACs and other committees25 squares$160.4K
Show the data
Sources of Adams's money, 2026 cycle, one square per percent
SourceAmountShare
Individuals (itemized)$476.2K74.8%
PACs and other committees$160.4K25.2%
What this means, and what it doesn’t

Totals say how much a campaign took in, not how it was spent, and they rise sharply when a seat is up for election; compare cycles with that in mind.

Receipts by cycle

Itemized contributions, 2020 to 2026. The grey line is the State Senate Republicans’ median for 2026.

2020 cycle: $26.7K$26.7K20202022 cycle: $168.0K$168.0K20222024 cycle: $21.9K$21.9K20242026 cycle: $636.6K$636.6K2026State Senate Republicans median $46.2K
Show the data
Adams's receipts by cycle against the 2026 State Senate Republicans median.
ItemValue
2020 cycle$26.7K
2022 cycle$168.0K
2024 cycle$21.9K
2026 cycle$636.6K

Top donor states, 2026

Itemized contributions by donor state. 87% came from Kentucky.

  1. Kentucky$413.8K
  2. Connecticut$14.0K
  3. Nevada$11.4K
  4. Florida$8,600
  5. California$6,300

Small donations

State filings report no total for small gifts.

Not reported in state filings.

Where itemized donors live

Individuals who gave more than $200, by donor state

Alaska: no dataAKMaine: no dataMEVermont: no dataVTNew Hampshire: no dataNHWashington: no dataWAIdaho: $2,200IDMontana: no dataMTNorth Dakota: no dataNDMinnesota: no dataMNIllinois: no dataILWisconsin: $250WIMichigan: no dataMINew York: no dataNYRhode Island: no dataRIMassachusetts: no dataMAOregon: no dataORNevada: $11.4KNVWyoming: no dataWYSouth Dakota: no dataSDIowa: no dataIAIndiana: $2,731INOhio: $3,850OHPennsylvania: $3,500PANew Jersey: no dataNJConnecticut: $14.0KCTCalifornia: $6,300CAUtah: no dataUTColorado: $2,000CONebraska: no dataNEMissouri: no dataMOKentucky: $413.8KKYWest Virginia: no dataWVVirginia: $1,600VAMaryland: $500MDDelaware: no dataDEArizona: no dataAZNew Mexico: no dataNMKansas: no dataKSArkansas: no dataARTennessee: no dataTNNorth Carolina: $1,500NCSouth Carolina: no dataSCDistrict of Columbia: $500DCOklahoma: $3,500OKLouisiana: no dataLAMississippi: no dataMSAlabama: no dataALGeorgia: no dataGAHawaii: no dataHITexas: no dataTXFlorida: $8,600FL
Show the data
Adams's itemized individual contributions by donor state, 2026 cycle
StateValue
Kentucky$413.8K
Connecticut$14.0K
Nevada$11.4K
Florida$8,600
California$6,300
Ohio$3,850
Pennsylvania$3,500
Oklahoma$3,500
Indiana$2,731
Idaho$2,200
Colorado$2,000
Virginia$1,600
North Carolina$1,500
Maryland$500
District of Columbia$500
Wisconsin$250
AlaskaNo data
MaineNo data
VermontNo data
New HampshireNo data
WashingtonNo data
MontanaNo data
North DakotaNo data
MinnesotaNo data
IllinoisNo data
MichiganNo data
New YorkNo data
Rhode IslandNo data
MassachusettsNo data
OregonNo data
WyomingNo data
South DakotaNo data
IowaNo data
New JerseyNo data
UtahNo data
NebraskaNo data
MissouriNo data
West VirginiaNo data
DelawareNo data
ArizonaNo data
New MexicoNo data
KansasNo data
ArkansasNo data
TennesseeNo data
South CarolinaNo data
LouisianaNo data
MississippiNo data
AlabamaNo data
GeorgiaNo data
HawaiiNo data
TexasNo data
383

itemized donors

People who gave more than $200

87%

from Kentucky

Of itemized individual dollars

How to read the map

Every state the same size. Darker states gave more itemized money; hatched states had no itemized donors; the outlined state is Kentucky. Gifts of $200 or less carry no address and are left out.

Top donor occupations

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

  1. RETIRED$73.8K 65 donors
  2. ATTORNEY$34.9K 32 donors
  3. STATE SENATOR$34.4K 12 donors
  4. MANAGEMENT$29.8K 18 donors
  5. FOUNDER$24.2K 9 donors

Top committees

PAC and committee contributions, 2026 cycle.

  1. KENTUCKY CHAMBER PAC$5,700
  2. KY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES PAC$5,700
  3. KY DISTILLERS ASSOCIATION BOURBON TRAIL PAC$5,700
  4. WINE AND SPIRITS WHOLESALERS OF KY PAC$5,700
  5. CENTENE CORP PAC$4,700

Top employers

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

  1. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY$30.6K 19 donors
  2. HOUSEWIFE$19.9K 19 donors
  3. COMMONWEALTH OF KY$18.3K 5 donors
  4. CEO$12.4K 4 donors
  5. UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$10.2K 5 donors

Aggregates only. Individual donors are never named.

Back to topNext: Votes

Votes

Adams voted with the majority of Kentucky Senate Republicans on 93.4% of party-line votes and missed 5.1% of 803 roll calls. Kentucky Senate on average: 95.3% party unity, 97.0% attendance. Across all roll calls, Adams voted against the majority of Kentucky Senate Republicans 12 times.

803 roll calls Adams could vote on in the KY 2025–26 session, compared with Kentucky Senate. Attendance is the share with a vote recorded. Party unity counts only party-line roll calls, where most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides, and is the share of those where Adams voted with the majority of Kentucky Senate Republicans. The count of votes against that majority covers every roll call where the majority took a side.

12

votes against the majority of Kentucky Senate Republicans

Party unity 93.4%, Kentucky Senate average 95.3%, ranks 33rd of 38. 803 roll calls in the KY 2025–26 session.

Attendance and party unity

The thick bar is Adams, the thin grey bar the Kentucky Senate average. The scale runs from 80% to 100% to show the gap.

80%100%
Adams
Peers
Rank
Attendance
94.8%
97.0%
29th of 38
Party unity
93.4%
95.3%
33rd of 38
Show the data
Adams's attendance and party unity against Kentucky Senate.
RowAdamsPeers
Attendance94.8%97.0%
Party unity93.4%95.3%
What this means, and what it doesn’t

A missed roll call has many causes, from illness to campaigning, so attendance says how often, not why. A vote against the majority can be on procedure as well as substance, and many fall on roll calls where both parties split; the key votes below show the ones that decided something.

Key votes

25 roll calls the lab flagged as key in the KY 2025–26 session

Key votes
Party split (yea–nay)Why it’s key
Apr 15, 2026
SB 66
AN ACT relating to the operation of a motor vehicle.
FINAL PASSAGE OF SB 66 w/ HCS 1
YeaWith majoritypassD 5–0 · R 31–0Democrats 5 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 31 yea, 0 naybecame law
Apr 15, 2026
HB 826
AN ACT relating to education.
CONSENT PASSAGE OF HB 826 w/ SCS 1, SCA 1 (T)
YeaWith majoritypassD 5–0 · R 33–0Democrats 5 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 33 yea, 0 naybecame law
Apr 15, 2026
SB 133
AN ACT relating to the fiscal reporting of local entities.
FINAL PASSAGE OF SB 133 w/ HFA 3
YeaWith majoritypassD 5–0 · R 32–0Democrats 5 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 32 yea, 0 naybecame law
Apr 15, 2026
SB 37
AN ACT relating to state symbols.
FINAL PASSAGE OF SB 37 w/ HFA 1, HFA 3, HFA 2 (T)
NayAgainst majoritypassD 5–0 · R 31–1Democrats 5 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 31 yea, 1 naybecame law
Apr 15, 2026
SJR 116
A JOINT RESOLUTION directing the University of Kentucky, the University of Louisville, and Eastern Kentucky University to coordinate a search for actionable solutions to physician shortages and to explore and expand health care opportunities in medically underserved areas in collaboration with commu
FINAL PASSAGE OF SJR 116 w/ HCS 1, HFA 1, HCA 1 (T)
YeaWith majoritypassD 5–0 · R 32–0Democrats 5 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 32 yea, 0 naybecame law
How key votes are chosen

Automatically: a final-passage or override vote where the measure became law, the margin was under 10%, at least 10% of either party voted against its majority, or the bill was among the 25 most mentioned in officials’ own statements. Up to 25 per window, most recent first; five are shown. Bars show yea on the left, nay on the right, per party.

Votes most often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Adams most often

  1. Mike WilsonR322 shared votes99%
  2. Amanda BledsoeR752 shared votes99%
  3. Steve MeredithR342 shared votes99%
  4. Brandon SmithR273 shared votes99%
  5. Craig RichardsonR761 shared votes98%

Votes least often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Adams least often

  1. Gerald NealD714 shared votes80%
  2. Walker ThomasR417 shared votes81%
  3. Reggie ThomasD338 shared votes81%
  4. Cassie ArmstrongD754 shared votes81%
  5. Keturah HerronD756 shared votes81%
How to read the agreement lists

The share of roll calls both members voted on where they voted the same way, among colleagues sharing at least 50 such votes. High agreement with members of the other party is common on routine votes.

Full voting record

KY 2025–26 session, loads in batches

Back to topNext: Legislation

Legislation

No bills for the KY 2025–26 session.No sponsored or cosponsored bills are recorded for this official in this time window.

Back to topNext: Online

Online

A site that changed 1 time in 90 days. Adams’s official site had 1 page when last crawled on Oct 1, 2026.

The lab crawls Adams’s official and campaign websites (weekly for Congress, monthly for the states) and keeps every page’s text, so changes can be read later; it also records social accounts and describes the images Adams posts with a vision model.

Websites

How to read the counts

“Pages crawled” is the size of the site at the last crawl; “changes in 90 days” counts pages whose text differed from the previous crawl. Sites change for many routine reasons, such as new press releases, so a high count is not by itself notable.

Images Adams posted

No images from Adams’s posts have been described.

About the descriptions

Written by a vision model and may be wrong. Open the post to see the original. Five are shown; the toggle shows the rest.

State floor speeches

181 turns, Feb 2, 2021 to Apr 15, 2026

Floor speeches

Transcribed from chamber video or captions by the lab. They are not classified for kinds of statement.

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

How this page was made. Profile built Oct 28, 2026; site last built Oct 28, 2026. Every number on the page is computed from the sources listed here, by the same rules for every official; nothing is written by hand.

The headline

The headline is the measure on which Adams is most unusual among State Senate Republicans, chosen by one rule for every official of every party. The candidates are the rate of each kind of statement and of extreme labels, party unity, attendance, the small-donor share, the in-state share and total receipts of the latest cycle, the share of sponsored bills that got out of committee, talk-to-bills agreement, and the CSIP score’s place within the party group.

The builder ranks every measure within the same peer group the page compares it with, and writes each official’s percentile: the share of the group below the value, ties counting half, so 0.5 is the median and a value shared by many never ranks first. A measure’s score is how far that percentile sits from the median (0 in the middle, 0.5 at either end), and the highest score leads if it is above 0.25, outside the middle half of the group. Scores within 0.03 of each other are a tie, broken in this order: votes against the party majority, kinds of statement, ideology, roll calls missed, small donations, in-state money, legislation, agreement, extreme labels, receipts.

A measure counts only with at least 200 statements, 100 roll calls or 5 sponsored bills behind it and a peer group of at least 10. Two things never lead: high party unity or attendance, where most members sit, and a high rate of a kind of statement backed by fewer than 10 statements. When nothing qualifies, the headline is a neutral fact instead: statements classified, or years in office. The wording always names the direction (“in the bottom 5% of …”, “votes against the majority of …”).

Identifiers

Profile id
38ae421f-f4fa-40f6-b025-a75bc6b42f35
Open States
ocd-person/38ae421f-f4fa-40f6-b025-a75bc6b42f35

Bulk files with the same data for every official:

Freshness of this profile’s data

  • What politicians sayOct 27, 20261 days agoMembers of Congress: tweets since 2017; press releases, newsletters and floor speeches since 2022. State legislators: tweets since May 2024. Governors: tweets since January 2025. Labels from an LLM classifier.
  • Roll calls (state)Oct 21, 20267 days agoOpen States floor roll calls, 2019 on (none for AK and MO).
  • Bills (state)Oct 28, 2026todayOpen States bills and sponsors, 2019 on; stages from roll calls.
  • Campaign money (state)no dateState campaign-finance agencies, 2019 on; aggregates only.
  • Ideology (CSIP)Oct 25, 20263 days agoCommon-Space Ideal Points (CSIP), current validated run.
  • WebsitesOct 25, 20263 days agoWeekly crawls of federal sites since April 2026; monthly state crawls since June 2026.
  • State floor speechesOct 21, 20267 days agoState floor speech turns (published transcripts and captions), 2020 on; not LLM-classified.

How the measures work

What politicians say
Every post, press release, newsletter and congressional floor speech is read by a language model and marked for personal attacks, policy criticism, policy discussion, bipartisanship and credit claiming. A statement can be in several. Rates are shares of statements in the window. The methods paper.
Extreme labels
A statement has an extreme label when it calls a politician, party or policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who the label is aimed at.
Policy areas and agreement
Statements and bills share 25 Congressional Research Service policy areas (state bills are assigned by a language model). Agreement is 1 − Jensen–Shannon distance between the two distributions, shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
Ideology (CSIP)
Common-Space Ideal Points place federal and state officials on one left–right scale, estimated jointly from roll calls, campaign contributions and the text of statements, with standard errors. Only a validated run is shown. The methods paper.
Campaign money
Campaigns report by name only donors who give more than $200 in a cycle; smaller gifts are reported as one total. Federal totals and the small-donor share come from the FEC’s financial summaries of each campaign committee. Donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations cover itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift totals, so state figures are itemized only. The lab never publishes donor names.
Votes and key votes
Attendance, party unity and the count of votes against the majority of an official’s own party come from roll calls (Voteview for Congress, chamber records for the states). Key votes are final-passage or override votes that became law, were decided by under 10%, saw at least 10% of a party vote against its majority, or concerned one of the 25 bills most mentioned in officials’ statements.
Peers and ranks
Comparisons are with the same party, chamber and level (for example House Democrats); state legislators are compared within their state and chamber for votes. Every comparison names its group. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; tied values share the average of their ranks, and the percentile is the share of the group below the value, ties counting half.

America’s Political Pulse · Polarization Research Lab

Back to top