Skip to content

Republican · U.S. House, Georgia’s 12th district

Serving since Jan 6, 2015119th Congress (2025–27)next election Nov 3, 2026

Bioguide A000372FEC H2GA12121

Portrait of Rick Allen, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
73%
of itemized money from Georgia donors, in the top quarter of House Republicans

73% of the itemized money from individuals in the 2026 cycle came from donors with an address in Georgia. Ranks 32nd of 216, where 1st is the highest share. 343 itemized donors.

Only donors who give more than $200 are reported with an address, so this is the share of that itemized money from donors living in Georgia, ranked among House Republicans. Small gifts are not counted either way. Candidates running statewide or for federal office often draw more money from out of state.

At a glance

6 measures against House Republicans. 47% of Allen’s statements claim credit, in the top quarter of House Republicans (average 37%). Allen sits at +1.24 on the CSIP scale, more conservative than 80% of House Republicans.

The measures on which Allen sits furthest from the middle of House Republicans, each against the same group, with the CSIP score when there is one. Every number is explained in its own section below.

Party unity

99.5%

House Republicans average 97.1% · ranks 12th of 221 · 8 votes against the majority of House Republicans

From Georgia, 2026

73%

Of itemized individual dollars · ranks 32nd of 216 House Republicans

Credit claiming

47%

House Republicans average 37% · ranks 43rd of 221

CSIP ideology

+1.24

More conservative than 80% of House Republicans · ± 0.01

Bipartisanship

13%

House Republicans average 8.9% · ranks 54th of 221

Out of committee

23%

House Republicans average 17% · ranks 54th of 216

Peer group: House Republicans. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; the thick bar is Allen, the thin grey bar the peer average. The headline is the measure on which Allen is most unusual among peers (Methods, §08).

Back to topNext: What politicians say

What Allen says

Allen attacks opponents personally less than 63% of House Republicans. Personal attacks in 0.6% of 799 statements, against 2.1% for the average House Republican; 142nd of 221.

An AI model reads each of Allen’s 799 statements in the 119th Congress (526 posts on X, 106 press releases, 90 Congressional Record speeches, 77 newsletters) and marks the kinds of statement it contains: a personal attack, criticism of a policy, discussion of policy, bipartisanship, credit claiming, and extreme labels. A statement can carry several. Every rate is compared with the average for House Republicans and ranked among them.

Kinds of statement

Share of statements carrying each label, the 119th Congress

0%80%
Allen
Peers
Rank
Policy discussion573 statements
72%
68%
85th of 221
Credit claiming379 statements
47%
37%
43rd of 221
Policy criticism140 statements
18%
15%
66th of 221
Bipartisanship102 statements
13%
9%
54th of 221
Personal attacks5 statements
1%
2%
142nd of 221
Show the data
Allen's share of statements in each category against the House Republicans average.
RowAllenPeers
Policy discussion72%68%
Credit claiming47%37%
Policy criticism18%15%
Bipartisanship13%9%
Personal attacks1%2%
799

statements classified

526 posts on X, 106 press releases, 90 Congressional Record speeches, 77 newsletters.

posts on X: 526 (65.8%)posts on X 526press releases: 106 (13.3%)Congressional Record speeches: 90 (11.3%)newsletters: 77 (9.6%)
Show the data
Allen's statements by source
PartValue
posts on X526
press releases106
Congressional Record speeches90
newsletters77
How to read the bars

The thick bar is Allen; the thin grey bar is the average House Republicans. A longer thick bar means Allen does this more than peers. Rank 1 is the highest rate in the group.

Extreme labels

Allen used extreme labels in 2.4% of statements, below the peer average. 19 statements, most often aimed at Democrats; peers 3.0%.

  1. “radical”15
  2. “woke”3
  3. “communist”2
  4. “extreme”1

Who gets the labels

Targets named alongside an extreme label, by number of statements

  1. Democrats3
  2. Biden-Harris Administration2
  3. foreign policy programs2
  4. Biden administration1
  5. DEI1
What an extreme label is

Calls a politician, a party or a policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who or what the label was aimed at. The lists show the five most used labels and targets; the toggle shows the rest.

Month by month

Share of statements per month, the 119th Congress

Statements2025-01: 472025-02: 442025-03: 502025-04: 512025-05: 392025-06: 492025-07: 312025-08: 212025-09: 352025-10: 332025-11: 202025-12: 352026-01: 352026-02: 462026-03: 402026-04: 802026-05: 252026-06: 382026-07: 272026-08: 212026-09: 202026-10: 12peak 80 · Apr ’26Personal attackspeak 2.9% · Jan ’26 · latest 0.0%Personal attacks, 2025-01: 0.0% of 47Personal attacks, 2025-02: 0.0% of 44Personal attacks, 2025-03: 2.0% of 50Personal attacks, 2025-04: 0.0% of 51Personal attacks, 2025-05: 2.6% of 39Personal attacks, 2025-06: 0.0% of 49Personal attacks, 2025-07: 0.0% of 31Personal attacks, 2025-08: 0.0% of 21Personal attacks, 2025-09: 0.0% of 35Personal attacks, 2025-10: 0.0% of 33Personal attacks, 2025-11: 0.0% of 20Personal attacks, 2025-12: 0.0% of 35Personal attacks, 2026-01: 2.9% of 35Personal attacks, 2026-02: 2.2% of 46Personal attacks, 2026-03: 0.0% of 40Personal attacks, 2026-04: 1.3% of 80Personal attacks, 2026-05: 0.0% of 25Personal attacks, 2026-06: 0.0% of 38Personal attacks, 2026-07: 0.0% of 27Personal attacks, 2026-08: 0.0% of 21Personal attacks, 2026-09: 0.0% of 20Personal attacks, 2026-10: 0.0% of 12Policy criticismpeak 39.4% · Oct ’25 · latest 16.7%Policy criticism, 2025-01: 25.5% of 47Policy criticism, 2025-02: 20.4% of 44Policy criticism, 2025-03: 20.0% of 50Policy criticism, 2025-04: 13.7% of 51Policy criticism, 2025-05: 12.8% of 39Policy criticism, 2025-06: 16.3% of 49Policy criticism, 2025-07: 12.9% of 31Policy criticism, 2025-08: 9.5% of 21Policy criticism, 2025-09: 28.6% of 35Policy criticism, 2025-10: 39.4% of 33Policy criticism, 2025-11: 30.0% of 20Policy criticism, 2025-12: 25.7% of 35Policy criticism, 2026-01: 17.1% of 35Policy criticism, 2026-02: 15.2% of 46Policy criticism, 2026-03: 17.5% of 40Policy criticism, 2026-04: 8.8% of 80Policy criticism, 2026-05: 20.0% of 25Policy criticism, 2026-06: 15.8% of 38Policy criticism, 2026-07: 11.1% of 27Policy criticism, 2026-08: 0.0% of 21Policy criticism, 2026-09: 10.0% of 20Policy criticism, 2026-10: 16.7% of 12Policy discussionpeak 91.7% · Oct ’26 · latest 91.7%Policy discussion, 2025-01: 68.1% of 47Policy discussion, 2025-02: 86.4% of 44Policy discussion, 2025-03: 72.0% of 50Policy discussion, 2025-04: 70.6% of 51Policy discussion, 2025-05: 71.8% of 39Policy discussion, 2025-06: 79.6% of 49Policy discussion, 2025-07: 71.0% of 31Policy discussion, 2025-08: 66.7% of 21Policy discussion, 2025-09: 74.3% of 35Policy discussion, 2025-10: 78.8% of 33Policy discussion, 2025-11: 65.0% of 20Policy discussion, 2025-12: 80.0% of 35Policy discussion, 2026-01: 88.6% of 35Policy discussion, 2026-02: 67.4% of 46Policy discussion, 2026-03: 70.0% of 40Policy discussion, 2026-04: 52.5% of 80Policy discussion, 2026-05: 64.0% of 25Policy discussion, 2026-06: 65.8% of 38Policy discussion, 2026-07: 74.1% of 27Policy discussion, 2026-08: 90.5% of 21Policy discussion, 2026-09: 60.0% of 20Policy discussion, 2026-10: 91.7% of 12Bipartisanshippeak 25.7% · Sep ’25 · latest 25.0%Bipartisanship, 2025-01: 19.1% of 47Bipartisanship, 2025-02: 4.5% of 44Bipartisanship, 2025-03: 16.0% of 50Bipartisanship, 2025-04: 11.8% of 51Bipartisanship, 2025-05: 7.7% of 39Bipartisanship, 2025-06: 16.3% of 49Bipartisanship, 2025-07: 16.1% of 31Bipartisanship, 2025-08: 0.0% of 21Bipartisanship, 2025-09: 25.7% of 35Bipartisanship, 2025-10: 15.2% of 33Bipartisanship, 2025-11: 20.0% of 20Bipartisanship, 2025-12: 20.0% of 35Bipartisanship, 2026-01: 8.6% of 35Bipartisanship, 2026-02: 13.0% of 46Bipartisanship, 2026-03: 7.5% of 40Bipartisanship, 2026-04: 8.8% of 80Bipartisanship, 2026-05: 12.0% of 25Bipartisanship, 2026-06: 13.2% of 38Bipartisanship, 2026-07: 14.8% of 27Bipartisanship, 2026-08: 0.0% of 21Bipartisanship, 2026-09: 10.0% of 20Bipartisanship, 2026-10: 25.0% of 12Credit claimingpeak 66.0% · Jan ’25 · latest 50.0%Credit claiming, 2025-01: 66.0% of 47Credit claiming, 2025-02: 56.8% of 44Credit claiming, 2025-03: 58.0% of 50Credit claiming, 2025-04: 45.1% of 51Credit claiming, 2025-05: 53.8% of 39Credit claiming, 2025-06: 59.2% of 49Credit claiming, 2025-07: 58.1% of 31Credit claiming, 2025-08: 42.9% of 21Credit claiming, 2025-09: 57.1% of 35Credit claiming, 2025-10: 33.3% of 33Credit claiming, 2025-11: 40.0% of 20Credit claiming, 2025-12: 45.7% of 35Credit claiming, 2026-01: 45.7% of 35Credit claiming, 2026-02: 47.8% of 46Credit claiming, 2026-03: 40.0% of 40Credit claiming, 2026-04: 25.0% of 80Credit claiming, 2026-05: 48.0% of 25Credit claiming, 2026-06: 47.4% of 38Credit claiming, 2026-07: 44.4% of 27Credit claiming, 2026-08: 42.9% of 21Credit claiming, 2026-09: 40.0% of 20Credit claiming, 2026-10: 50.0% of 12Extreme labelspeak 8.6% · Dec ’25 · latest 0.0%Extreme labels, 2025-01: 4.3% of 47Extreme labels, 2025-02: 2.3% of 44Extreme labels, 2025-03: 2.0% of 50Extreme labels, 2025-04: 0.0% of 51Extreme labels, 2025-05: 0.0% of 39Extreme labels, 2025-06: 0.0% of 49Extreme labels, 2025-07: 6.5% of 31Extreme labels, 2025-08: 0.0% of 21Extreme labels, 2025-09: 2.9% of 35Extreme labels, 2025-10: 0.0% of 33Extreme labels, 2025-11: 0.0% of 20Extreme labels, 2025-12: 8.6% of 35Extreme labels, 2026-01: 8.6% of 35Extreme labels, 2026-02: 4.3% of 46Extreme labels, 2026-03: 2.5% of 40Extreme labels, 2026-04: 0.0% of 80Extreme labels, 2026-05: 0.0% of 25Extreme labels, 2026-06: 0.0% of 38Extreme labels, 2026-07: 7.4% of 27Extreme labels, 2026-08: 0.0% of 21Extreme labels, 2026-09: 5.0% of 20Extreme labels, 2026-10: 0.0% of 12Jan ’25Jul ’25Jan ’26Jul ’26Oct ’26
Show the data
Monthly rates for Allen, each row shaded against its own peak, with statement volume. Months with fewer than 10 statements are left blank.
ColumnStatementsPersonal attacksPolicy criticismPolicy discussionBipartisanshipCredit claimingExtreme labels
Jan ’25470.0%25.5%68.1%19.1%66.0%4.3%
Feb ’25440.0%20.4%86.4%4.5%56.8%2.3%
Mar ’25502.0%20.0%72.0%16.0%58.0%2.0%
Apr ’25510.0%13.7%70.6%11.8%45.1%0.0%
May ’25392.6%12.8%71.8%7.7%53.8%0.0%
Jun ’25490.0%16.3%79.6%16.3%59.2%0.0%
Jul ’25310.0%12.9%71.0%16.1%58.1%6.5%
Aug ’25210.0%9.5%66.7%0.0%42.9%0.0%
Sep ’25350.0%28.6%74.3%25.7%57.1%2.9%
Oct ’25330.0%39.4%78.8%15.2%33.3%0.0%
Nov ’25200.0%30.0%65.0%20.0%40.0%0.0%
Dec ’25350.0%25.7%80.0%20.0%45.7%8.6%
Jan ’26352.9%17.1%88.6%8.6%45.7%8.6%
Feb ’26462.2%15.2%67.4%13.0%47.8%4.3%
Mar ’26400.0%17.5%70.0%7.5%40.0%2.5%
Apr ’26801.3%8.8%52.5%8.8%25.0%0.0%
May ’26250.0%20.0%64.0%12.0%48.0%0.0%
Jun ’26380.0%15.8%65.8%13.2%47.4%0.0%
Jul ’26270.0%11.1%74.1%14.8%44.4%7.4%
Aug ’26210.0%0.0%90.5%0.0%42.9%0.0%
Sep ’26200.0%10.0%60.0%10.0%40.0%5.0%
Oct ’26120.0%16.7%91.7%25.0%50.0%0.0%
How to read the strips

Each row is one kind of statement; each cell is a month, shaded against that row’s own peak (darker = closer to the peak), with the peak and the latest value written at the right. The top row counts statements. The strip covers every month of the 119th Congress, the same span as the rates above, including months with no statements. A month with fewer than 10 statements is hatched, not shaded: one or two posts would swing its rate to 0% or 100%.

In Allen’s words

Real statements from the classifier’s example set, with the labels it assigned

Bipartisanship

October District Work Period: Part Three [Representative Rick Allen] <https://allen.house.gov/components/redirect/r.aspx?ID=17900-1130863> congressman allen's e-newsletter October district work period: part Three Bulloch County [Statesboro] Touring the Statesboro Fire Department's new Station…

Oct 25, 2026 · Newsletters · policy criticism; policy discussion; bipartisanship; credit claiming; Agriculture and Food; Commerce; Emergency Management; Science, Technology, Communications; Environmental Protection; Housing and Community Development; Labor and Employment

Personal attacks

Congressman Allen Votes for Budget Framework to Fund ICE and Border Protection Washington, April 30, 2026 Last night, House Republicans passed S. Con. Res. 33, which establishes a congressional budget to responsibly fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CB…

Apr 30, 2026 · Press releases · personal attacks; policy discussion; credit claiming; Immigration; Armed Forces and National Security; Economics and Public Finance; target: Democrats · Source

Extreme label

Responsibly Funding the Government [Representative Rick Allen] <https://allen.house.gov/components/redirect/r.aspx?ID=17708-1130863> CONGRESSMAN ALLEN'S E-NEWSLETTER Responsibly Funding the Government [CR] This week, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 6500, with my support, to avoid a har…

Sep 6, 2026 · Newsletters · policy discussion; credit claiming; Armed Forces and National Security; Commerce; International Affairs; Economics and Public Finance; Science, Technology, Communications; Energy; Environmental Protection; Government Operations and Politics; Labor and Employment; Transportation and Public Works; extreme label “radical” aimed at today, Democratic Party

Examples by category

Up to five recent statements in each category

Category

Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

  1. Press releases

    Congressman Allen Votes for Budget Framework to Fund ICE and Border Protection Washington, April 30, 2026 Last night, House Republicans passed S. Con. Res. 33, which establishes a congressional budget to responsibly fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through the end of President Trump’s term, ensuring these agencies are able to keep the American people safe from thr…

    personal attacks · policy discussion · credit claiming · Immigration · Armed Forces and National Security · Economics and Public Finance · target: DemocratsSource

  2. Newsletters

    Bolstering Election Integrity [Representative Rick Allen] <https://allen.house.gov/components/redirect/r.aspx?ID=16652-1130863> congressman allen's e-newsletter Bolstering Election Integrity [SAVE Act] The right to vote is a foundational principle of the United States of America, and its integrity must be protected. One thing we should all agree on is that America’s elections must be secure and all voters should…

    personal attacks · policy discussion · bipartisanship · credit claiming · Agriculture and Food · Economics and Public Finance · Emergency Management · Science, Technology, Communications · Education · Government Operations and Politics · Housing and Community Development · Health · target: House Democrats

  3. Congressional Record

    I thank my friend from Ohio for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of HR 5184, the Affordable HOMES Act. Mr. Speaker, for many years, including when I first got started in my career in the construction industry, buying and owning a home was reachable and a significant achievement for American workers. In fact, just 6 years ago it was achievable, but unfortunately, in today's economic conditions, many youn…

    personal attacks · policy criticism · policy discussion · Housing and Community Development · Government Operations and Politics · Economics and Public Finance · EnergySource

  4. Newsletters

    Commemorating National Police Week | | National Police Week serves as a powerful reminder of the sacrifices made by our law enforcement officers and the vital role they play in protecting our communities, our families, and our loved ones. While they face increasing challenges and threats to their safety, as the recent tragedy in Columbia County has shown us, it is more important now than ever to stand with our men a…

    personal attacks · policy discussion · credit claiming · Crime and Law Enforcement · Foreign Trade and International Finance · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Energy · Economics and Public Finance · Science, Technology, Communications · Commerce · Health · Immigration · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · target: Democratic colleagues

  5. Newsletters

    President Trump Delivers a Joint Address to Congress March 9th, 2025 ? congressman allen's e-newsletter President Trump Delivers a Joint Address to Congress I was honored to be on the House floor for President Donald J Trump's first Joint Address to Congress during his second term in the White House. President Trump is already making good on his promises to the American people. In less than two months, this administr…

    personal attacks · policy criticism · policy discussion · bipartisanship · credit claiming · Armed Forces and National Security · Commerce · International Affairs · Energy · Government Operations and Politics · Immigration · Education · Economics and Public Finance · Science, Technology, Communications · Health · Transportation and Public Works · Crime and Law Enforcement

All 799 statements

Newest first, the 119th Congress

The full feed

Five statements at a time, newest first; filters apply to the statements loaded so far. Export saves the statements that match. Sources: 526 posts on X, 106 press releases, 90 Congressional Record speeches, 77 newsletters.

Back to topNext: Policy

Policy

Armed Forces and National Security is what Allen talks about most: 24% of policy statements. Talk and legislation agree at 0.63 on a 0–1 scale (House Republicans average 0.64; 139th of 221).

Each policy statement is tagged by the AI model with one or more of 25 policy areas from the Congressional Research Service list, so the shares say what Allen talks about. The bills Allen sponsors and cosponsors carry the same areas, so the two can be compared.

What Allen talks about

Share of policy statements by area, the 119th Congress

0%35%
Allen
Peers
Armed Forces and National Security136 statements
24%
24%
Health111 statements
19%
15%
Economics and Public Finance107 statements
19%
19%
Labor and Employment104 statements
18%
6%
Energy96 statements
17%
9%
Show the data
Policy areas Allen talks about, as a share of policy statements, against the House Republicans average.
RowAllenPeers
Armed Forces and National Security24%24%
Health19%15%
Economics and Public Finance19%19%
Labor and Employment18%6%
Energy17%9%
How to read the bars

The thick bar is the share of Allen’s policy statements in an area; the thin grey bar is the average share for House Republicans. A statement counts once in each of its areas, so shares can add to more than 100%. The five largest areas are shown; the toggle shows the rest.

Talks about · legislates on

Left: share of statements by policy area. Right: share of bills. Areas in order of their share of statements; both sides run from 0 to 35%. Grey ticks are the House Republicans averages.

Talks aboutLegislates onArmed Forces and NationalSecurityArmed Forces and National Security, talks about: 24% (House Republicans 24%)24%Armed Forces and National Security, legislates on: 2% (House Republicans 8%)2%HealthHealth, talks about: 19% (House Republicans 15%)19%Health, legislates on: 18% (House Republicans 11%)18%Economics and Public FinanceEconomics and Public Finance, talks about: 19% (House Republicans 19%)19%Economics and Public Finance, legislates on: 1% (House Republicans 2%)1%Labor and EmploymentLabor and Employment, talks about: 18% (House Republicans 6%)18%Labor and Employment, legislates on: 15% (House Republicans 2%)15%EnergyEnergy, talks about: 17% (House Republicans 9%)17%Energy, legislates on: 3% (House Republicans 3%)3%
Show the data
Allen's share of statements against share of bills in each policy area.
AreaTalks aboutHouse Republicans, talks aboutLegislates onHouse Republicans, legislates on
Armed Forces and National Security24%24%2%8%
Health19%15%18%11%
Economics and Public Finance19%19%1%2%
Labor and Employment18%6%15%2%
Energy17%9%3%3%
0.63

talk-to-bills agreement, 0 to 1

House Republicans average 0.64. Ranks 139th of 221.

What agreement means, and what it doesn’t

Agreement is 1 minus the distance between the two distributions (Jensen–Shannon): 1 means Allen legislates on exactly the areas Allen talks about, in the same proportions; 0 means no overlap. It does not say whether the bills match the positions in the statements, only the subjects. Bills Allen sponsored count fully, cosponsored bills a quarter. Shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.

Back to topNext: Ideology

Ideology

Allen sits at +1.24 on the CSIP scale, right of 0, more conservative than 80% of House Republicans. Approximate range +1.23 to +1.26, which understates the uncertainty; from 1,982 donors and 6,294 roll calls.

CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official, federal and state, on one left–right scale, estimated from roll-call votes, who gives money to whom, and the text of statements. Negative is left of 0, positive right of it; 0 is the centre of the scale, not a definition of “moderate”.

+1.24

CSIP ideal point

Approximate range +1.23 to +1.26. From 1,982 donors and 6,294 roll calls. Run 2026-10-25T215945. Blue is left of 0, red right of 0.

← More liberalMore conservative →0Allen +1.2House Republicans +1.0All House +0.3

The outlined dot is Allen, coloured by its side of 0 (blue left, red right, deeper further out); the bar through it is the approximate range (±1.96 standard errors), which understates the uncertainty; the grey ticks below are the medians of Allen’s groups. 0 is the centre of the scale, not “moderate” by definition.

What this means, and what it doesn’t

The score summarises how an official votes, who funds them and how they talk, relative to everyone else. It does not grade positions as good or bad, and two officials with the same score can differ on any single issue. The ± range is 1.96 standard errors, which understates the uncertainty: scores whose ranges overlap may not differ at all, and even scores whose ranges do not overlap may not differ.

Where Allen sits

Every official in each group, on the CSIP scale

−2.0−1.00.0+1.0+2.0← More liberalMore conservative →House Republicansmedian +1.0Allen +1.2All Housemedian +0.3
Show the data
Allen's CSIP score of +1.24 placed against House Republicans, All House.
GroupOfficialsMedianShare left of Allen
House Republicans221+1.080%
All House439+0.390%
How to read the strips

Every small dot is one official on the same scale, coloured by its own score (blue left of 0, red right of 0, grey at 0, deeper further out) and spread up and down only to keep dots apart; where a group is crowded the dots overlap, and darker patches mean more officials. The large outlined dot is Allen in every row; the rule is each group’s median. The table under the figure gives the share of each group to the left of Allen.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Allen raised $1.3M in the 2026 cycle, below the House Republicans’ median of $2.2M. 5.6% of individual money came in gifts of $200 or less. 73% of itemized individual money came from Georgia.

Campaign money from Federal Election Commission filings, as aggregates only; the lab never shows an individual donor. Campaigns must report by name every person who gives them more than $200 in a cycle (“itemized”); smaller gifts are reported only as one total (“unitemized”), so donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations describe itemized donors only.

Election cycle
$1.3M

raised in the 2026 cycle

From 343 itemized donors. House Republicans’ median $2.2M.

Where the money came from

Each square is one percent of 2026-cycle receipts, from FEC summary totals.

Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Itemized individual (over $200): $590.9K (46.8%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $34.9K (2.8%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $34.9K (2.8%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $34.9K (2.8%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)PACs and other committees: $637.9K (50.5%)
  • Itemized individual (over $200)47 squares$590.9K
  • Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less)3 squares$34.9K
  • PACs and other committees50 squares$637.9K
Show the data
Sources of Allen's money, 2026 cycle, one square per percent
SourceAmountShare
Itemized individual (over $200)$590.9K46.8%
Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less)$34.9K2.8%
PACs and other committees$637.9K50.5%
What this means, and what it doesn’t

Totals say how much a campaign took in, not how it was spent, and they rise sharply when a seat is up for election; compare cycles with that in mind. The small-donor share understates small giving when a campaign itemizes gifts made through ActBlue or WinRed.

Receipts by cycle

Total receipts, 2020 to 2026. The grey line is the House Republicans’ median for 2026.

2020 cycle: $1.2M$1.2M20202022 cycle: $990.7K$990.7K20222024 cycle: $1.2M$1.2M20242026 cycle: $1.3M$1.3M2026House Republicans median $2.2M
Show the data
Allen's receipts by cycle against the 2026 House Republicans median.
ItemValue
2020 cycle$1.2M
2022 cycle$990.7K
2024 cycle$1.2M
2026 cycle$1.3M

Top donor states, 2026

Itemized contributions by donor state. 73% came from Georgia.

  1. Georgia$331.0K
  2. Virginia$29.5K
  3. Florida$17.5K
  4. North Carolina$10.0K
  5. Louisiana$10.0K

Small donations

Gifts of $200 or less as a share of individual money, by cycle. The thin grey bar is the 2026 House Republicans’ median.

0%60%
Allen
Median
2026
6%
9%
2024
6%
9%
2022
8%
9%
2020
9%
9%
Show the data
Small-donor share by cycle against the House Republicans median
RowAllenMedian
2026 cycle6%9%
2024 cycle6%9%
2022 cycle8%9%
2020 cycle9%9%

Where itemized donors live

Individuals who gave more than $200, by donor state

Alaska: no dataAKMaine: no dataMEVermont: no dataVTNew Hampshire: no dataNHWashington: no dataWAIdaho: no dataIDMontana: no dataMTNorth Dakota: no dataNDMinnesota: no dataMNIllinois: $2,750ILWisconsin: $1,000WIMichigan: no dataMINew York: $500NYRhode Island: no dataRIMassachusetts: no dataMAOregon: no dataORNevada: no dataNVWyoming: no dataWYSouth Dakota: no dataSDIowa: no dataIAIndiana: no dataINOhio: no dataOHPennsylvania: no dataPANew Jersey: no dataNJConnecticut: no dataCTCalifornia: $3,500CAUtah: no dataUTColorado: no dataCONebraska: no dataNEMissouri: no dataMOKentucky: $1,000KYWest Virginia: no dataWVVirginia: $29.5KVAMaryland: $8,000MDDelaware: no dataDEArizona: no dataAZNew Mexico: no dataNMKansas: no dataKSArkansas: $500ARTennessee: $3,500TNNorth Carolina: $10.0KNCSouth Carolina: $8,500SCDistrict of Columbia: $6,250DCOklahoma: no dataOKLouisiana: $10.0KLAMississippi: $2,500MSAlabama: $2,600ALGeorgia: $331.0KGAHawaii: no dataHITexas: $9,200TXFlorida: $17.5KFL
Show the data
Allen's itemized individual contributions by donor state, 2026 cycle
StateValue
Georgia$331.0K
Virginia$29.5K
Florida$17.5K
North Carolina$10.0K
Louisiana$10.0K
Texas$9,200
South Carolina$8,500
Maryland$8,000
District of Columbia$6,250
California$3,500
Tennessee$3,500
Illinois$2,750
Alabama$2,600
Mississippi$2,500
Wisconsin$1,000
Kentucky$1,000
New York$500
Arkansas$500
AlaskaNo data
MaineNo data
VermontNo data
New HampshireNo data
WashingtonNo data
IdahoNo data
MontanaNo data
North DakotaNo data
MinnesotaNo data
MichiganNo data
Rhode IslandNo data
MassachusettsNo data
OregonNo data
NevadaNo data
WyomingNo data
South DakotaNo data
IowaNo data
IndianaNo data
OhioNo data
PennsylvaniaNo data
New JerseyNo data
ConnecticutNo data
UtahNo data
ColoradoNo data
NebraskaNo data
MissouriNo data
West VirginiaNo data
DelawareNo data
ArizonaNo data
New MexicoNo data
KansasNo data
OklahomaNo data
HawaiiNo data
343

itemized donors

People who gave more than $200

73%

from Georgia

Of itemized individual dollars

How to read the map

Every state the same size. Darker states gave more itemized money; hatched states had no itemized donors; the outlined state is Georgia. Gifts of $200 or less carry no address and are left out.

Donors’ ideology

Distribution of itemized donors’ own CSIP scores

CSIP −0.50 to −0.25: 2.0%CSIP −0.25 to 0.00: 0.7%CSIP 0.00 to +0.25: 0.2%CSIP +0.25 to +0.50: 1.0%CSIP +0.50 to +0.75: 0.9%CSIP +0.75 to +1.00: 19%CSIP +1.00 to +1.25: 75%75%CSIP +1.25 to +1.50: 0.8%← More liberalMore conservative →0
Show the data
Ideology of Allen's itemized donors in 2026, from −0.50 to +1.50: 19% between +0.75 and +1.00, 75% between +1.00 and +1.25.
ItemValue
CSIP −0.50 to −0.252.0%
CSIP −0.25 to 0.000.7%
CSIP 0.00 to +0.250.2%
CSIP +0.25 to +0.501.0%
CSIP +0.50 to +0.750.9%
CSIP +0.75 to +1.0019%
CSIP +1.00 to +1.2575%
CSIP +1.25 to +1.500.8%
How to read the columns

Donors who give to many candidates get their own CSIP score. Each column is the share of Allen’s itemized money from donors in that part of the scale, blue left of 0 and red right of 0, deeper further out; Allen’s own score is +1.24.

Top donor occupations

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

  1. RETIRED$96.7K 78 donors
  2. OWNER$38.3K 22 donors
  3. PRESIDENT$36.7K 18 donors
  4. HOMEMAKER$30.6K 18 donors
  5. CONSULTANT$26.5K 11 donors

Top committees

PAC and committee contributions, 2026 cycle.

  1. AFLAC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AFLAC PAC)$10.0K
  2. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ABC PAC)$10.0K
  3. COX ENTERPRISES PAC (COXPAC) INC.$10.0K
  4. INVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ICI PAC)$10.0K
  5. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NABPAC)$10.0K

Top employers

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

  1. UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL$2,000 3 donors
  2. PLANTERS EMC$1,150 5 donors

Aggregates only. Individual donors are never named.

Back to topNext: Votes

Votes

Allen voted with the majority of House Republicans on 99.5% of party-line votes and missed 1.6% of 674 roll calls. House Republicans on average: 97.1% party unity, 96.3% attendance. Across all roll calls, Allen voted against the majority of House Republicans 8 times.

674 roll calls Allen could vote on in the 119th Congress, compared with House Republicans. Attendance is the share with a vote recorded. Party unity counts only party-line roll calls, where most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides, and is the share of those where Allen voted with the majority of House Republicans. The count of votes against that majority covers every roll call where the majority took a side.

8

votes against the majority of House Republicans

Party unity 99.5%, House Republicans average 97.1%, ranks 12th of 221. 674 roll calls in the 119th Congress.

Attendance and party unity

The thick bar is Allen, the thin grey bar the House Republicans average. The scale runs from 80% to 100% to show the gap.

80%100%
Allen
Peers
Rank
Attendance
98.3%
96.3%
92nd of 221
Party unity
99.5%
97.1%
12th of 221
Show the data
Allen's attendance and party unity against House Republicans.
RowAllenPeers
Attendance98.3%96.3%
Party unity99.5%97.1%
What this means, and what it doesn’t

A missed roll call has many causes, from illness to campaigning, so attendance says how often, not why. A vote against the majority can be on procedure as well as substance, and many fall on roll calls where both parties split; the key votes below show the ones that decided something.

Key votes

25 roll calls the lab flagged as key in the 119th Congress

Key votes
Party split (yea–nay)Why it’s key
Sep 16, 2026
S. 2403
Retire through Ownership Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
YeaWith majorityPassedD 209–0 · R 191–14 · I 1–0Democrats 209 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 191 yea, 14 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 naybecame law
Sep 16, 2026
H.J.Res. 213
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the “California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision”
On Passage
YeaWith majorityPassedD 3–207 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 3 yea, 207 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nayclose vote
Sep 16, 2026
H.R. 10326
PROOF Act
On Passage
YeaWith majorityPassedD 6–206 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 6 yea, 206 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nayclose vote
Sep 16, 2026
H.R. 9576
National Fraud Enforcement Division Act
On Passage
YeaWith majorityPassedD 139–72 · R 212–0 · I 1–0Democrats 139 yea, 72 nay; Republicans 212 yea, 0 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nayparty crossover
Sep 16, 2026
H.R. 5334
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments
YeaWith majorityPassedD 58–152 · R 203–7 · I 1–0Democrats 58 yea, 152 nay; Republicans 203 yea, 7 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 naybecame law · party crossover
How key votes are chosen

Automatically: a final-passage or override vote where the measure became law, the margin was under 10%, at least 10% of either party voted against its majority, or the bill was among the 25 most mentioned in officials’ own statements. Up to 25 per window, most recent first; five are shown. Bars show yea on the left, nay on the right, per party.

Votes most often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Allen most often

  1. Mike JohnsonR514 shared votes99%
  2. Doug LamalfaR337 shared votes99%
  3. Rudy YakymR663 shared votes99%
  4. Trent KellyR658 shared votes99%
  5. Sam GravesR616 shared votes99%

Votes least often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Allen least often

  1. Adelita GrijalvaD381 shared votes22%
  2. Rashida TlaibD647 shared votes23%
  3. Delia RamirezD630 shared votes23%
  4. Gregorio CasarD564 shared votes24%
  5. Frederica WilsonD473 shared votes24%
How to read the agreement lists

The share of roll calls both members voted on where they voted the same way, among colleagues sharing at least 50 such votes. High agreement with members of the other party is common on routine votes.

Full voting record

119th Congress (2025–27), loads in batches

Back to topNext: Legislation

Legislation

Allen sponsored 22 bills in the 119th Congress; none became law. Cosponsored 147 others. 23% of sponsored bills got out of committee (House Republicans average 17%; 54th of 216).

The bills Allen sponsored and cosponsored in the 119th Congress, from the official bill records, and how far each got: introduced, referred to or acted on in committee, passed one chamber, passed both, became law. A bill counts at every stage it has reached, so the blocks only shrink to the right.

Bills by stage

Counts for the 119th Congress

Sponsored22 billsSponsored, Introduced: 2222Sponsored, In committee: 2222Sponsored, Passed one chamber: 22Sponsored, Passed both chambers: 00Sponsored, Became law: 00Cosponsored147 billsCosponsored, Introduced: 147147Cosponsored, In committee: 147147Cosponsored, Passed one chamber: 1818Cosponsored, Passed both chambers: 11Cosponsored, Became law: 11IntroducedIncommitteePassed onechamberPassed bothchambersBecamelaw
Show the data
Bills Allen sponsored and cosponsored, by furthest stage reached
RoleIntroducedIn committeePassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law
Sponsored2222200
Cosponsored1471471811
How to read the blocks

Ink blocks are bills Allen sponsored, ochre blocks bills Allen cosponsored; the figure above each block is the count. Most bills in any legislature never leave committee, so a short staircase is the norm.

23%

of sponsored bills got out of committee

House Republicans average 17%. Ranks 54th of 216.

Cosponsorship partners

Colleagues who most often cosponsor with Allen, by number of shared bills in the 119th Congress; the square shows their party.

  1. Buddy Carter24
  2. Glenn Grothman14
  3. Randy Weber Sr.14
  4. Barry Loudermilk12
  5. Mary Miller12
What this means, and what it doesn’t

The score is the share of sponsored bills that a committee reported out or a chamber passed, with at least 5 sponsored bills, ranked within the peer group. Members of the majority party and committee chairs move more bills, so the rank reflects position in the chamber as well as effort. Cosponsorship partners are the five colleagues who share the most of Allen’s bills; the toggle shows more.

Bill list

Sponsored and cosponsored, with status and policy area; five are shown, the toggle shows the rest

Bills sponsored and cosponsored
H.R. 10369Net Effective Cost Transparency and Prescription Drug Affordability Act of 2026CosponsorSep 14, 2026In committeeHealthReferred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Sep 14, 2026
H.Res. 1521Honoring the 100th anniversary of the American Cleaning Institute and recognizing the contributions of the cleaning products industry to the health, safety, and economic vitality of the United States.SponsorSep 10, 2026In committeeHealthReferred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Sep 10, 2026
H.Res. 1490Providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms, and for other purposes.CosponsorAug 27, 2026Passed one chamberGovernment Operations and PoliticsMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. Sep 1, 2026
H.Res. 1451Recognizing Charleston as the appropriate host city for the 2027 annual meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly.CosponsorJul 23, 2026In committeeInternational AffairsReferred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Jul 23, 2026
H.R. 9798Employer Health Plan Flexibility ActSponsorJul 21, 2026In committeeHealthReferred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Jul 21, 2026

Back to topNext: Online

Online

A site that changed 66 times in 90 days. Allen’s official site had 33 pages when last crawled on Oct 25, 2026. The lab last catalogued the images Allen posted on Oct 21, 2026.

The lab crawls Allen’s official and campaign websites (weekly for Congress, monthly for the states) and keeps every page’s text, so changes can be read later; it also records social accounts and describes the images Allen posts with a vision model.

Websites

  • Official site

    allen.house.gov

    Last crawled Oct 25, 2026

    33

    pages crawled

    66

    changes in 90 days

  • Campaign site

    rickwallen.com

    Last crawled Oct 25, 2026

    6

    pages crawled

    1

    changes in 90 days

How to read the counts

“Pages crawled” is the size of the site at the last crawl; “changes in 90 days” counts pages whose text differed from the previous crawl. Sites change for many routine reasons, such as new press releases, so a high count is not by itself notable.

Images Allen posted

The latest 24, with model-written descriptions

  • A group of six men, including several firefighters in uniform, pose in front of a fire truck inside a fire station. Text is visible on the truck.
    A group of six men, including several firefighters in uniform, pose in front of a fire truck inside a fire station. Text is visible on the truck.View post
  • A political announcement graphic featuring a photograph of a man speaking into a microphone at a hearing, with an American flag and blurred people in the background. Large headline and quotation text appear above and below him.
    A political announcement graphic featuring a photograph of a man speaking into a microphone at a hearing, with an American flag and blurred people in the background. Large headline and quotation text appear above and below him.View post
  • A graphic celebrating the United States Navy, featuring an aircraft carrier at sea with large celebratory lettering and a small political logo near the bottom.
    A graphic celebrating the United States Navy, featuring an aircraft carrier at sea with large celebratory lettering and a small political logo near the bottom.View post
  • A graphic featuring a close-up photo of a white-haired man wearing glasses and a suit, speaking into a microphone. A headline and a quote about legislation appear over the lower part of the image, with an attribution at the bottom.
    A graphic featuring a close-up photo of a white-haired man wearing glasses and a suit, speaking into a microphone. A headline and a quote about legislation appear over the lower part of the image, with an attribution at the bottom.View post
  • A political graphic featuring a photograph of an older man in a suit seated at a hearing table, alongside a large block of text. A representative’s logo appears in the upper-left corner and a congressional attribution appears along the bottom.
    A political graphic featuring a photograph of an older man in a suit seated at a hearing table, alongside a large block of text. A representative’s logo appears in the upper-left corner and a congressional attribution appears along the bottom.View post
About the descriptions

Written by a vision model and may be wrong. Open the post to see the original. Five are shown; the toggle shows the rest.

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

How this page was made. Profile built Oct 28, 2026; site last built Oct 28, 2026. Every number on the page is computed from the sources listed here, by the same rules for every official; nothing is written by hand.

The headline

The headline is the measure on which Allen is most unusual among House Republicans, chosen by one rule for every official of every party. The candidates are the rate of each kind of statement and of extreme labels, party unity, attendance, the small-donor share, the in-state share and total receipts of the latest cycle, the share of sponsored bills that got out of committee, talk-to-bills agreement, and the CSIP score’s place within the party group.

The builder ranks every measure within the same peer group the page compares it with, and writes each official’s percentile: the share of the group below the value, ties counting half, so 0.5 is the median and a value shared by many never ranks first. A measure’s score is how far that percentile sits from the median (0 in the middle, 0.5 at either end), and the highest score leads if it is above 0.25, outside the middle half of the group. Scores within 0.03 of each other are a tie, broken in this order: votes against the party majority, kinds of statement, ideology, roll calls missed, small donations, in-state money, legislation, agreement, extreme labels, receipts.

A measure counts only with at least 200 statements, 100 roll calls or 5 sponsored bills behind it and a peer group of at least 10. Two things never lead: high party unity or attendance, where most members sit, and a high rate of a kind of statement backed by fewer than 10 statements. When nothing qualifies, the headline is a neutral fact instead: statements classified, or years in office. The wording always names the direction (“in the bottom 5% of …”, “votes against the majority of …”).

Identifiers

Profile id
A000372
Bioguide
A000372
FEC candidate ids
H2GA12121

Bulk files with the same data for every official:

Freshness of this profile’s data

  • What politicians sayOct 27, 20261 days agoMembers of Congress: tweets since 2017; press releases, newsletters and floor speeches since 2022. State legislators: tweets since May 2024. Governors: tweets since January 2025. Labels from an LLM classifier.
  • Roll calls (Congress)Sep 30, 202628 days agoVoteview roll calls, 113th Congress (2013) on.
  • Bills (Congress)Oct 22, 20266 days agoGovInfo BILLSTATUS: sponsors, cosponsors, actions, CRS policy area.
  • Campaign money (FEC)Oct 22, 20266 days agoFEC committee financial summaries (totals, small donations) and itemized contributions (donor counts, states, employers), cycles 2020-2026; aggregates only.
  • Ideology (CSIP)Oct 25, 20263 days agoCommon-Space Ideal Points (CSIP), current validated run.
  • WebsitesOct 25, 20263 days agoWeekly crawls of federal sites since April 2026; monthly state crawls since June 2026.
  • ImagesOct 28, 2026todayImages in members' tweets with vision-model descriptions.

How the measures work

What politicians say
Every post, press release, newsletter and congressional floor speech is read by a language model and marked for personal attacks, policy criticism, policy discussion, bipartisanship and credit claiming. A statement can be in several. Rates are shares of statements in the window. The methods paper.
Extreme labels
A statement has an extreme label when it calls a politician, party or policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who the label is aimed at.
Policy areas and agreement
Statements and bills share 25 Congressional Research Service policy areas (state bills are assigned by a language model). Agreement is 1 − Jensen–Shannon distance between the two distributions, shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
Ideology (CSIP)
Common-Space Ideal Points place federal and state officials on one left–right scale, estimated jointly from roll calls, campaign contributions and the text of statements, with standard errors. Only a validated run is shown. The methods paper.
Campaign money
Campaigns report by name only donors who give more than $200 in a cycle; smaller gifts are reported as one total. Federal totals and the small-donor share come from the FEC’s financial summaries of each campaign committee. Donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations cover itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift totals, so state figures are itemized only. The lab never publishes donor names.
Votes and key votes
Attendance, party unity and the count of votes against the majority of an official’s own party come from roll calls (Voteview for Congress, chamber records for the states). Key votes are final-passage or override votes that became law, were decided by under 10%, saw at least 10% of a party vote against its majority, or concerned one of the 25 bills most mentioned in officials’ statements.
Peers and ranks
Comparisons are with the same party, chamber and level (for example House Democrats); state legislators are compared within their state and chamber for votes. Every comparison names its group. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; tied values share the average of their ranks, and the percentile is the share of the group below the value, ties counting half.

America’s Political Pulse · Polarization Research Lab

Back to top