14% of 14 sponsored bills got out of committee; the average for House Democrats is 4.9%. Ranks 17th of 207, where 1st is the highest share.
The share of bills Randall sponsored that a committee reported out or a chamber passed, ranked among House Democrats. Members of the majority party and committee chairs move more bills, so the rank reflects position as well as effort.
6 measures against House Democrats. 86% of Randall’s itemized money in the 2026 cycle came from Washington, in the top tenth of House Democrats. Randall sits at −1.25 on the CSIP scale, more liberal than 85% of House Democrats.
The measures on which Randall sits furthest from the middle of House Democrats, each against the same group, with the CSIP score when there is one. Every number is explained in its own section below.
Out of committee
House Democrats average 4.9% · ranks 17th of 207
From Washington, 2026
Of itemized individual dollars · ranks 18th of 214 House Democrats
Party unity
House Democrats average 96.4% · ranks 28th of 217 · 14 votes against the majority of House Democrats
CSIP ideology
More liberal than 85% of House Democrats · ± 0.03
Small donations, 2026
House Democrats’ median 13% · ranks 37th of 214
Attendance
House Democrats average 96.9% · ranks 151st of 217 · 674 roll calls
Peer group: House Democrats. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; the thick bar is Randall, the thin grey bar the peer average. The headline is the measure on which Randall is most unusual among peers (Methods, §08).
Randall stresses bipartisanship more than 99% of House Democrats. Bipartisanship in 33% of 174 statements, against 9.8% for the average House Democrat; 2nd of 216.
An AI model reads each of Randall’s 174 statements in the 119th Congress (89 Congressional Record speeches, 55 newsletters, 30 press releases) and marks the kinds of statement it contains: a personal attack, criticism of a policy, discussion of policy, bipartisanship, credit claiming, and extreme labels. A statement can carry several. Every rate is compared with the average for House Democrats and ranked among them.
Share of statements carrying each label, the 119th Congress
| Row | Randall | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| Policy discussion | 80% | 73% |
| Credit claiming | 47% | 23% |
| Bipartisanship | 33% | 10% |
| Policy criticism | 29% | 28% |
| Personal attacks | 7% | 7% |
statements classified
89 Congressional Record speeches, 55 newsletters, 30 press releases.
| Part | Value |
|---|---|
| Congressional Record speeches | 89 |
| newsletters | 55 |
| press releases | 30 |
The thick bar is Randall; the thin grey bar is the average House Democrats. A longer thick bar means Randall does this more than peers. Rank 1 is the highest rate in the group.
Randall used extreme labels in 4.0% of statements, 2.1 times the peer average. 7 statements, most often aimed at Republicans; peers 1.9%.
Targets named alongside an extreme label, by number of statements
Calls a politician, a party or a policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who or what the label was aimed at. The lists show the five most used labels and targets; the toggle shows the rest.
Share of statements per month, the 119th Congress
| Column | Statements | Personal attacks | Policy criticism | Policy discussion | Bipartisanship | Credit claiming | Extreme labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan ’25 | 1 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Feb ’25 | 1 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Mar ’25 | 1 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Apr ’25 | 2 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| May ’25 | 5 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Jun ’25 | 5 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Jul ’25 | 5 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Aug ’25 | 5 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Sep ’25 | 8 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Oct ’25 | 3 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Nov ’25 | 5 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Dec ’25 | 61 | 0.0% | 11.5% | 57.4% | 19.7% | 24.6% | 0.0% |
| Jan ’26 | 8 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Feb ’26 | 9 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Mar ’26 | 11 | 27.3% | 27.3% | 90.9% | 54.5% | 72.7% | 0.0% |
| Apr ’26 | 5 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| May ’26 | 17 | 11.8% | 35.3% | 82.3% | 58.8% | 58.8% | 0.0% |
| Jun ’26 | 10 | 20.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 90.0% | 0.0% |
| Jul ’26 | 6 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Aug ’26 | 1 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Sep ’26 | 1 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
| Oct ’26 | 4 | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) | — (fewer than 10 statements) |
Each row is one kind of statement; each cell is a month, shaded against that row’s own peak (darker = closer to the peak), with the peak and the latest value written at the right. The top row counts statements. The strip covers every month of the 119th Congress, the same span as the rates above, including months with no statements. A month with fewer than 10 statements is hatched, not shaded: one or two posts would swing its rate to 0% or 100%. 18 months are hatched here.
Real statements from the classifier’s example set, with the labels it assigned
Credit claiming
Randall to Introduce Resolution Calling for Disabled Women to be Paid Fairly In 2024, disabled women in WA were paid as low as $0.65 for every dollar compared to nondisabled men WASHINGTON, D.C. — This week Congresswomen Emily Randall (D, WA-06), Lateefah Simon (D, CA-12), and Ayanna Pressley (D, MA…
Oct 23, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; credit claiming; Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues; Labor and Employment · Source
Bipartisanship
Randall’s Bipartisan Bill to Boost Funding for Tribes Neighboring Military Bases Passes House WASHINGTON, D.C. — Yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the National Defense Authorization Act of 2027 by a vote of 216-212. Congresswoman Emily Randall (D, WA-06) ultimately voted NO on the…
Jul 23, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; bipartisanship; credit claiming; Armed Forces and National Security; International Affairs; Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues; Economics and Public Finance; Education; Health; Housing and Community Development; Labor and Employment; Transportation and Public Works · Source
Extreme label
4 Years Since Dobbs, Trump Refuses to Sign Housing Deal & More | | | | | | Friends, Neighbors ~ Good news! Two weeks ago, Republicans and Democrats actually agreed on something and passed a massive bipartisan housing bill to lower costs and help address the housing crisis facing all of our communit…
Jul 7, 2026 · Newsletters · personal attacks; policy discussion; bipartisanship; Housing and Community Development; Government Operations and Politics; Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues; Health; Education; Immigration; Public Lands and Natural Resources; Commerce; Armed Forces and National Security; extreme label “extreme” aimed at Republicans; target: Donald Trump, Robert Kennedy
Up to five recent statements in each category
Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.
Newsletters
4 Years Since Dobbs, Trump Refuses to Sign Housing Deal & More | | | | | | Friends, Neighbors ~ Good news! Two weeks ago, Republicans and Democrats actually agreed on something and passed a massive bipartisan housing bill to lower costs and help address the housing crisis facing all of our communities! The bad news…Trump refused to sign the bill, calling it, "a big yawn," and said he won't sign the bill - or any bil…
personal attacks · policy discussion · bipartisanship · Housing and Community Development · Government Operations and Politics · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · Health · Education · Immigration · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Commerce · Armed Forces and National Security · extreme label “extreme” aimed at Republicans · target: Donald Trump, Robert Kennedy
Newsletters
Holding the Powerful Accountable & Protecting Your Privacy | | | | | | Friends, Neighbors ~ Last week in D.C. was another busy (and frustrating!) one as House Republicans continued to talk a big game about "accountability" while missing the mark on real fraud and abuse. But I spent the week pushing for transparency and common-sense solutions - questioning Bill Gates as a part of our Oversight investigation into Jeff…
personal attacks · policy discussion · bipartisanship · credit claiming · Crime and Law Enforcement · Government Operations and Politics · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · Environmental Protection · Education · Immigration · Emergency Management · Economics and Public Finance · Health · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Armed Forces and National Security · target: Todd Blanche, Donald Trump
Newsletters
Protecting WA-06: Reliable Mail, Wildfire Preparedness, Stronger Communities | | | | | | Friends, neighbors ~ Last week, I was back in D.C., fighting for the resources and safety our neighbors in WA-06 deserve. From questioning officials about mail delays impacting our rural communities to pressing Trump's U.S. Fire Chief on their decision to cut resources for wildfire prevention and research, I made it clear that o…
personal attacks · policy discussion · bipartisanship · credit claiming · Environmental Protection · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · Emergency Management · Science, Technology, Communications · Economics and Public Finance · Labor and Employment · Government Operations and Politics · Immigration · Education · Crime and Law Enforcement · Transportation and Public Works · target: Donald Trump
Congressional Record
Mr. Speaker on May 12, 2026, Oversight Committee Democrats convened the first-ever hearing to solicit testimony from survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's crimes. The hearing, ``Survivors Fight for Justice: Exposing Epstein's Crimes in Palm Beach and Across the World,'' marked a critical step forward in the fight for justice and accountability. On behalf of all the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis…
personal attacks · policy criticism · policy discussion · bipartisanship · credit claiming · Crime and Law Enforcement · Law · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesSource
Newsletters
A Hard Fought Win for Our Communities | | | | | | Friends, neighbors - Last week in D.C. was an interesting one. Despite having the majority, Mike Johnson struggled to get members in his own party on the same page on a number of issues. Votes were held open for hours, other votes cancelled, and chaos was the general mood. After shutting down the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for 76 days, Speaker Johnson fina…
personal attacks · policy discussion · bipartisanship · credit claiming · Agriculture and Food · Armed Forces and National Security · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · Environmental Protection · Economics and Public Finance · Emergency Management · Science, Technology, Communications · Government Operations and Politics · Labor and Employment · Health · Immigration · Transportation and Public Works · target: Pam Bondi
Newest first, the 119th Congress
Five statements at a time, newest first; filters apply to the statements loaded so far. Export saves the statements that match. Sources: 89 Congressional Record speeches, 55 newsletters, 30 press releases.
Government Operations and Politics is what Randall talks about most: 58% of policy statements, 2.9 times the peer share. Talk and legislation agree at 0.69 on a 0–1 scale (House Democrats average 0.67; 90th of 216).
Each policy statement is tagged by the AI model with one or more of 25 policy areas from the Congressional Research Service list, so the shares say what Randall talks about. The bills Randall sponsors and cosponsors carry the same areas, so the two can be compared.
Share of policy statements by area, the 119th Congress
| Row | Randall | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| Government Operations and Politics | 58% | 20% |
| Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues | 49% | 13% |
| Health | 47% | 26% |
| Armed Forces and National Security | 41% | 16% |
| Economics and Public Finance | 33% | 20% |
The thick bar is the share of Randall’s policy statements in an area; the thin grey bar is the average share for House Democrats. A statement counts once in each of its areas, so shares can add to more than 100%. The five largest areas are shown; the toggle shows the rest.
Left: share of statements by policy area. Right: share of bills. Areas in order of their share of statements; both sides run from 0 to 63%. Grey ticks are the House Democrats averages.
| Area | Talks about | House Democrats, talks about | Legislates on | House Democrats, legislates on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government Operations and Politics | 58% | 20% | 13% | 11% |
| Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues | 49% | 13% | 9% | 5% |
| Health | 47% | 26% | 17% | 16% |
| Armed Forces and National Security | 41% | 16% | 8% | 7% |
| Economics and Public Finance | 33% | 20% | 1% | 1% |
talk-to-bills agreement, 0 to 1
House Democrats average 0.67. Ranks 90th of 216.
Agreement is 1 minus the distance between the two distributions (Jensen–Shannon): 1 means Randall legislates on exactly the areas Randall talks about, in the same proportions; 0 means no overlap. It does not say whether the bills match the positions in the statements, only the subjects. Bills Randall sponsored count fully, cosponsored bills a quarter. Shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
Randall sits at −1.25 on the CSIP scale, left of 0, more liberal than 85% of House Democrats. Approximate range −1.28 to −1.22, which understates the uncertainty; from 3,785 donors and 1,542 roll calls.
CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official, federal and state, on one left–right scale, estimated from roll-call votes, who gives money to whom, and the text of statements. Negative is left of 0, positive right of it; 0 is the centre of the scale, not a definition of “moderate”.
CSIP ideal point
Approximate range −1.28 to −1.22. From 3,785 donors and 1,542 roll calls. Run 2026-10-25T215945. Blue is left of 0, red right of 0.
The outlined dot is Randall, coloured by its side of 0 (blue left, red right, deeper further out); the bar through it is the approximate range (±1.96 standard errors), which understates the uncertainty; the grey ticks below are the medians of Randall’s groups. 0 is the centre of the scale, not “moderate” by definition.
The score summarises how an official votes, who funds them and how they talk, relative to everyone else. It does not grade positions as good or bad, and two officials with the same score can differ on any single issue. The ± range is 1.96 standard errors, which understates the uncertainty: scores whose ranges overlap may not differ at all, and even scores whose ranges do not overlap may not differ.
Every official in each group, on the CSIP scale
| Group | Officials | Median | Share left of Randall |
|---|---|---|---|
| House Democrats | 217 | −1.0 | 15% |
| All House | 439 | +0.3 | 8% |
Every small dot is one official on the same scale, coloured by its own score (blue left of 0, red right of 0, grey at 0, deeper further out) and spread up and down only to keep dots apart; where a group is crowded the dots overlap, and darker patches mean more officials. The large outlined dot is Randall in every row; the rule is each group’s median. The table under the figure gives the share of each group to the left of Randall.
Randall raised $1.4M in the 2026 cycle, below the House Democrats’ median of $2.0M. 26% of individual money came in gifts of $200 or less. 86% of itemized individual money came from Washington.
Campaign money from Federal Election Commission filings, as aggregates only; the lab never shows an individual donor. Campaigns must report by name every person who gives them more than $200 in a cycle (“itemized”); smaller gifts are reported only as one total (“unitemized”), so donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations describe itemized donors only.
raised in the 2026 cycle
From 786 itemized donors. House Democrats’ median $2.0M.
Each square is one percent of 2026-cycle receipts, from FEC summary totals.
| Source | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Itemized individual (over $200) | $762.2K | 53.6% |
| Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less) | $267.1K | 18.8% |
| PACs and other committees | $385.7K | 27.1% |
| Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds) | $7,771 | 0.5% |
Totals say how much a campaign took in, not how it was spent, and they rise sharply when a seat is up for election; compare cycles with that in mind. The small-donor share understates small giving when a campaign itemizes gifts made through ActBlue or WinRed.
Total receipts, 2024 to 2026. The grey line is the House Democrats’ median for 2026.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024 cycle | $2.0M |
| 2026 cycle | $1.4M |
Itemized contributions by donor state. 86% came from Washington.
Gifts of $200 or less as a share of individual money, by cycle. The thin grey bar is the 2026 House Democrats’ median.
| Row | Randall | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 cycle | 26% | 13% |
| 2024 cycle | 27% | 13% |
Individuals who gave more than $200, by donor state
| State | Value |
|---|---|
| Washington | $477.4K |
| District of Columbia | $22.1K |
| New York | $20.9K |
| California | $11.6K |
| Maryland | $6,250 |
| Massachusetts | $5,775 |
| Texas | $2,750 |
| Virginia | $2,050 |
| Georgia | $1,750 |
| New Hampshire | $1,000 |
| Arizona | $1,000 |
| Oregon | $500 |
| New Jersey | $500 |
| Pennsylvania | $250 |
| Nevada | $200 |
| Florida | $200 |
| Minnesota | $163 |
| Illinois | $16 |
| Alaska | No data |
| Maine | No data |
| Vermont | No data |
| Idaho | No data |
| Montana | No data |
| North Dakota | No data |
| Wisconsin | No data |
| Michigan | No data |
| Rhode Island | No data |
| Wyoming | No data |
| South Dakota | No data |
| Iowa | No data |
| Indiana | No data |
| Ohio | No data |
| Connecticut | No data |
| Utah | No data |
| Colorado | No data |
| Nebraska | No data |
| Missouri | No data |
| Kentucky | No data |
| West Virginia | No data |
| Delaware | No data |
| New Mexico | No data |
| Kansas | No data |
| Arkansas | No data |
| Tennessee | No data |
| North Carolina | No data |
| South Carolina | No data |
| Oklahoma | No data |
| Louisiana | No data |
| Mississippi | No data |
| Alabama | No data |
| Hawaii | No data |
itemized donors
People who gave more than $200
from Washington
Of itemized individual dollars
Every state the same size. Darker states gave more itemized money; hatched states had no itemized donors; the outlined state is Washington. Gifts of $200 or less carry no address and are left out.
Distribution of itemized donors’ own CSIP scores
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| CSIP −1.75 to −1.50 | 0.2% |
| CSIP −1.50 to −1.25 | 5.3% |
| CSIP −1.25 to −1.00 | 65% |
| CSIP −1.00 to −0.75 | 24% |
| CSIP −0.75 to −0.50 | 1.4% |
| CSIP −0.50 to −0.25 | 2.8% |
| CSIP −0.25 to 0.00 | 0.4% |
| CSIP 0.00 to +0.25 | 0.3% |
| CSIP +0.75 to +1.00 | 0.1% |
Donors who give to many candidates get their own CSIP score. Each column is the share of Randall’s itemized money from donors in that part of the scale, blue left of 0 and red right of 0, deeper further out; Randall’s own score is −1.25.
Itemized, 2026 cycle.
PAC and committee contributions, 2026 cycle.
Itemized, 2026 cycle.
Aggregates only. Individual donors are never named.
Randall voted with the majority of House Democrats on 99.7% of party-line votes and missed 3.0% of 674 roll calls. House Democrats on average: 96.4% party unity, 96.9% attendance. Across all roll calls, Randall voted against the majority of House Democrats 14 times.
674 roll calls Randall could vote on in the 119th Congress, compared with House Democrats. Attendance is the share with a vote recorded. Party unity counts only party-line roll calls, where most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides, and is the share of those where Randall voted with the majority of House Democrats. The count of votes against that majority covers every roll call where the majority took a side.
votes against the majority of House Democrats
Party unity 99.7%, House Democrats average 96.4%, ranks 28th of 217. 674 roll calls in the 119th Congress.
The thick bar is Randall, the thin grey bar the House Democrats average. The scale runs from 80% to 100% to show the gap.
| Row | Randall | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 97.0% | 96.9% |
| Party unity | 99.7% | 96.4% |
A missed roll call has many causes, from illness to campaigning, so attendance says how often, not why. A vote against the majority can be on procedure as well as substance, and many fall on roll calls where both parties split; the key votes below show the ones that decided something.
25 roll calls the lab flagged as key in the 119th Congress
| Party split (yea–nay) | Why it’s key | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | Yea | With majority | Passed | D 209–0 · R 191–14 · I 1–0Democrats 209 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 191 yea, 14 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | became law | |
| Sep 16, 2026 | H.J.Res. 213 Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the “California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision” On Passage | Nay | With majority | Passed | D 3–207 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 3 yea, 207 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | close vote |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Nay | With majority | Passed | D 6–206 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 6 yea, 206 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | close vote | |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Yea | With majority | Passed | D 139–72 · R 212–0 · I 1–0Democrats 139 yea, 72 nay; Republicans 212 yea, 0 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | party crossover | |
| Sep 16, 2026 | H.R. 5334 An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments | Nay | With majority | Passed | D 58–152 · R 203–7 · I 1–0Democrats 58 yea, 152 nay; Republicans 203 yea, 7 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | became law · party crossover |
Automatically: a final-passage or override vote where the measure became law, the margin was under 10%, at least 10% of either party voted against its majority, or the bill was among the 25 most mentioned in officials’ own statements. Up to 25 per window, most recent first; five are shown. Bars show yea on the left, nay on the right, per party.
The colleagues who voted the same way as Randall most often
The colleagues who voted the same way as Randall least often
The share of roll calls both members voted on where they voted the same way, among colleagues sharing at least 50 such votes. High agreement with members of the other party is common on routine votes.
119th Congress (2025–27), loads in batches
Randall sponsored 14 bills in the 119th Congress; 1 became law. Cosponsored 456 others. 14% of sponsored bills got out of committee (House Democrats average 4.9%; 17th of 207).
The bills Randall sponsored and cosponsored in the 119th Congress, from the official bill records, and how far each got: introduced, referred to or acted on in committee, passed one chamber, passed both, became law. A bill counts at every stage it has reached, so the blocks only shrink to the right.
Counts for the 119th Congress
| Role | Introduced | In committee | Passed one chamber | Passed both chambers | Became law |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sponsored | 14 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Cosponsored | 456 | 456 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Ink blocks are bills Randall sponsored, ochre blocks bills Randall cosponsored; the figure above each block is the count. Most bills in any legislature never leave committee, so a short staircase is the norm.
of sponsored bills got out of committee
House Democrats average 4.9%. Ranks 17th of 207.
Colleagues who most often cosponsor with Randall, by number of shared bills in the 119th Congress; the square shows their party.
The score is the share of sponsored bills that a committee reported out or a chamber passed, with at least 5 sponsored bills, ranked within the peer group. Members of the majority party and committee chairs move more bills, so the rank reflects position in the chamber as well as effort. Cosponsorship partners are the five colleagues who share the most of Randall’s bills; the toggle shows more.
Sponsored and cosponsored, with status and policy area; five are shown, the toggle shows the rest
| H.Res. 1634 | Expressing support for the recognition of October 26, 2026, as Intersex Awareness Day, and supporting the goals and ideals of Intersex Awareness Day. | Cosponsor | Oct 22, 2026 | In committee | Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues | Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Oct 22, 2026 |
| H.Res. 1635 | Supporting the designation of October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day". | Cosponsor | Oct 22, 2026 | In committee | Unassigned | Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. Oct 22, 2026 |
| H.Res. 1637 | Recognizing the significance of equal pay and the pay disparity between disabled women and nondisabled men. | Cosponsor | Oct 22, 2026 | In committee | Unassigned | Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. Oct 22, 2026 |
| H.R. 10820 | Epstein Wall Street Records Act of 2026 | Cosponsor | Oct 15, 2026 | In committee | Finance and Financial Sector | Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. Oct 15, 2026 |
| H.Res. 1627 | Reaffirming the commitment of the House of Representatives to preserve and expand pathways to citizenship. | Cosponsor | Oct 15, 2026 | In committee | Immigration | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. Oct 15, 2026 |
A site that changed 47 times in 90 days. Randall’s official site had 26 pages when last crawled on Oct 25, 2026.
The lab crawls Randall’s official and campaign websites (weekly for Congress, monthly for the states) and keeps every page’s text, so changes can be read later; it also records social accounts and describes the images Randall posts with a vision model.
pages crawled
changes in 90 days
pages crawled
changes in 90 days
“Pages crawled” is the size of the site at the last crawl; “changes in 90 days” counts pages whose text differed from the previous crawl. Sites change for many routine reasons, such as new press releases, so a high count is not by itself notable.
No images from Randall’s posts have been described.
Written by a vision model and may be wrong. Open the post to see the original. Five are shown; the toggle shows the rest.
How this page was made. Profile built Oct 28, 2026; site last built Oct 28, 2026. Every number on the page is computed from the sources listed here, by the same rules for every official; nothing is written by hand.
The headline is the measure on which Randall is most unusual among House Democrats, chosen by one rule for every official of every party. The candidates are the rate of each kind of statement and of extreme labels, party unity, attendance, the small-donor share, the in-state share and total receipts of the latest cycle, the share of sponsored bills that got out of committee, talk-to-bills agreement, and the CSIP score’s place within the party group.
The builder ranks every measure within the same peer group the page compares it with, and writes each official’s percentile: the share of the group below the value, ties counting half, so 0.5 is the median and a value shared by many never ranks first. A measure’s score is how far that percentile sits from the median (0 in the middle, 0.5 at either end), and the highest score leads if it is above 0.25, outside the middle half of the group. Scores within 0.03 of each other are a tie, broken in this order: votes against the party majority, kinds of statement, ideology, roll calls missed, small donations, in-state money, legislation, agreement, extreme labels, receipts.
A measure counts only with at least 200 statements, 100 roll calls or 5 sponsored bills behind it and a peer group of at least 10. Two things never lead: high party unity or attendance, where most members sit, and a high rate of a kind of statement backed by fewer than 10 statements. When nothing qualifies, the headline is a neutral fact instead: statements classified, or years in office. The wording always names the direction (“in the bottom 5% of …”, “votes against the majority of …”).
Bulk files with the same data for every official:
America’s Political Pulse · Polarization Research Lab
