Raphael Warnock, U.S. Senate, Georgia — America’s Political Pulse

Democrat · U.S. Senate, Georgia

Serving since Jan 20, 2021119th Congress (2025–27)next election Nov 7, 2028

Bioguide W000790FEC S0GA00559

Official portrait

69%

of statements discuss policy, in the bottom quarter of Senate Democrats

69% of 2,031 statements discuss policy (1,411 statements); the average for Senate Democrats is 78%. Ranks 39th of 45, where 1st is the highest rate.

An AI model reads each of Warnock’s posts on X, Congressional Record speeches, press releases and newsletters and marks whether it discusses a specific policy. The rate is the share of statements marked; it is compared with the average among Senate Democrats and ranked against the same group.

At a glance

6 measures against Senate Democrats. 21% of the 29 bills Warnock sponsored got out of committee, in the top quarter of Senate Democrats. 50% of Warnock’s individual money in the 2026 cycle came in gifts of $200 or less, in the top quarter of Senate Democrats (median 35%).

The measures on which Warnock sits furthest from the middle of Senate Democrats, each against the same group, with the CSIP score when there is one. Every number is explained in its own section below.

Policy discussion

69%

Senate Democrats average 78% · ranks 39th of 45

Out of committee

21%

Senate Democrats average 14% · ranks 8th of 45

Small donations, 2026

50%

Senate Democrats’ median 35% · ranks 10th of 45

Talk-to-bills agreement

0.63

Senate Democrats average 0.66 · ranks 36th of 45

Bipartisanship

12%

Senate Democrats average 18% · ranks 35th of 45

CSIP ideology

−1.15

Left of 0, the centre of the scale · ± 0.02

Peer group: Senate Democrats. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; the thick bar is Warnock, the thin grey bar the peer average. The headline is the measure on which Warnock is most unusual among peers (Methods, §08).

What Warnock says

Warnock stresses bipartisanship less than 75% of Senate Democrats. Bipartisanship in 12% of 2,031 statements, against 18% for the average Senate Democrat; 35th of 45.

An AI model reads each of Warnock’s 2,031 statements in the 119th Congress (1,560 posts on X, 409 press releases, 55 Congressional Record speeches, 7 newsletters) and marks the kinds of statement it contains: a personal attack, criticism of a policy, discussion of policy, bipartisanship, credit claiming, and extreme labels. A statement can carry several. Every rate is compared with the average for Senate Democrats and ranked among them.

Kinds of statement

Share of statements carrying each label, the 119th Congress

0%20%40%60%80%

Warnock

Peers

Rank

Policy discussion1,411 statements

69%

78%

39th of 45

Policy criticism772 statements

38%

37%

18th of 45

Credit claiming396 statements

20%

26%

31st of 45

Bipartisanship252 statements

12%

18%

35th of 45

Personal attacks178 statements

11%

28th of 45

Show the data

Warnock's share of statements in each category against the Senate Democrats average.
Row	Warnock	Peers
Policy discussion	69%	78%
Policy criticism	38%	37%
Credit claiming	20%	26%
Bipartisanship	12%	18%
Personal attacks	9%	11%

2,031

statements classified

1,560 posts on X, 409 press releases, 55 Congressional Record speeches, 7 newsletters.

Show the data

Warnock's statements by source
Part	Value
posts on X	1,560
press releases	409
Congressional Record speeches	55
newsletters	7

How to read the bars

The thick bar is Warnock; the thin grey bar is the average Senate Democrats. A longer thick bar means Warnock does this more than peers. Rank 1 is the highest rate in the group.

Extreme labels

Warnock used extreme labels in 1.6% of statements, below the peer average. 33 statements, most often aimed at Kennedy; peers 2.4%.

“extreme”11
“radical”2
“MAGA”1
“communist”1
“fascist”1

Who gets the labels

Targets named alongside an extreme label, by number of statements

Kennedy3
President3
administration2
ICE2
Robert Kennedy2

What an extreme label is

Calls a politician, a party or a policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who or what the label was aimed at. The lists show the five most used labels and targets; the toggle shows the rest.

Month by month

Share of statements per month, the 119th Congress

Show the data

Monthly rates for Warnock, each row shaded against its own peak, with statement volume. Months with fewer than 10 statements are left blank.
Column	Statements	Personal attacks	Policy criticism	Policy discussion	Bipartisanship	Credit claiming	Extreme labels
Jan ’25	71	8.5%	29.6%	66.2%	18.3%	38.0%	0.0%
Feb ’25	111	6.3%	47.8%	86.5%	13.5%	36.0%	1.8%
Mar ’25	91	3.3%	45.1%	75.8%	17.6%	29.7%	0.0%
Apr ’25	114	5.3%	36.8%	60.5%	12.3%	27.2%	0.0%
May ’25	66	7.6%	34.8%	51.5%	7.6%	4.5%	0.0%
Jun ’25	108	0.0%	53.7%	74.1%	8.3%	12.0%	1.8%
Jul ’25	121	0.8%	54.5%	79.3%	11.6%	24.0%	0.0%
Aug ’25	83	4.8%	41.0%	65.1%	15.7%	20.5%	2.4%
Sep ’25	120	10.8%	47.5%	75.8%	14.2%	20.0%	4.2%
Oct ’25	101	4.0%	55.5%	77.2%	10.9%	18.8%	3.0%
Nov ’25	89	3.4%	60.7%	79.8%	15.7%	15.7%	0.0%
Dec ’25	82	6.1%	23.2%	54.9%	13.4%	18.3%	0.0%
Jan ’26	116	7.8%	15.5%	76.7%	9.5%	9.5%	0.0%
Feb ’26	99	12.1%	32.3%	49.5%	1.0%	6.1%	8.1%
Mar ’26	134	9.7%	52.2%	72.4%	14.2%	18.7%	2.2%
Apr ’26	99	14.1%	21.2%	59.6%	8.1%	10.1%	1.0%
May ’26	79	20.3%	25.3%	48.1%	7.6%	15.2%	2.5%
Jun ’26	98	13.3%	45.9%	62.2%	11.2%	18.4%	4.1%
Jul ’26	84	14.3%	16.7%	69.0%	20.2%	29.8%	0.0%
Aug ’26	57	21.1%	17.5%	91.2%	19.3%	17.5%	0.0%
Sep ’26	62	16.1%	22.6%	71.0%	14.5%	14.5%	0.0%
Oct ’26	46	21.7%	8.7%	73.9%	15.2%	23.9%	2.2%

How to read the strips

Each row is one kind of statement; each cell is a month, shaded against that row’s own peak (darker = closer to the peak), with the peak and the latest value written at the right. The top row counts statements. The strip covers every month of the 119th Congress, the same span as the rates above, including months with no statements. A month with fewer than 10 statements is hatched, not shaded: one or two posts would swing its rate to 0% or 100%.

In Warnock’s words

Real statements from the classifier’s example set, with the labels it assigned

Credit claiming

Warnock, Colleagues Launch Bicameral Inquiry Into Trump Administration’s Handling of Tariff Refunds Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock led a bicameral coalition in pressing the Government Accountability Office to investigate the Trump administration’s failure to deliver timely and accurate tariff ref…

Oct 22, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; credit claiming; Foreign Trade and International Finance; Government Operations and Politics; Housing and Community Development; Economics and Public Finance; Commerce · Source

Bipartisanship

Warnock, Ossoff Secure Nearly $12.5 Million to Improve Rail Safety Across Southwest Georgia Senators Reverend Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff successfully secured nearly $12.5 million in federal grant funding from the Department of Transportation to improve railway safety in Southwest Georgia The fu…

Oct 20, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; bipartisanship; credit claiming; Transportation and Public Works; Armed Forces and National Security · Source

Extreme label

Warnock Leads Bicameral Coalition in Opposing Trump Administration’s Proposed Head Start Overhaul Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock and 38 Congressional colleagues are calling on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to rescind its proposed overhaul of the Head Start program The administr…

Oct 7, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; bipartisanship; credit claiming; Education; Health; Families; Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues; Housing and Community Development; Labor and Employment; Government Operations and Politics; extreme label “extreme” aimed at English-only instruction · Source

Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Oct 25, 2026Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · target: Pete HegsethSource
Oct 24, 2026Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · policy discussion · Government Operations and Politics · target: Donald TrumpSource
Oct 21, 2026Press releases
Ahead of Midterms, New Warnock Report Finds Election Officials Across Georgia Confident in Election Security Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock released a new report examining Georgia’s election preparedness ahead of the November elections The report features testimony from election administrators across 10 Georgia counties, all of whom say they are prepared and confident in the security of the state’s midterm electio…
personal attacks · policy discussion · credit claiming · Government Operations and Politics · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · target: Donald TrumpSource
Oct 18, 2026Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · policy discussion · Government Operations and Politics · target: Trump familySource
Oct 14, 2026Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · target: Donald TrumpSource

All 2,031 statements

Newest first, the 119th Congress

The full feed

Five statements at a time, newest first; filters apply to the statements loaded so far. Export saves the statements that match. Sources: 1,560 posts on X, 409 press releases, 55 Congressional Record speeches, 7 newsletters.

Policy

Health is what Warnock talks about most: 41% of policy statements, above the peer share. Talk and legislation agree at 0.63 on a 0–1 scale (Senate Democrats average 0.66; 36th of 45).

Each policy statement is tagged by the AI model with one or more of 25 policy areas from the Congressional Research Service list, so the shares say what Warnock talks about. The bills Warnock sponsors and cosponsors carry the same areas, so the two can be compared.

What Warnock talks about

Share of policy statements by area, the 119th Congress

0%11%22%33%45%

Warnock

Peers

Health572 statements

41%

27%

Economics and Public Finance355 statements

25%

24%

Government Operations and Politics287 statements

20%

22%

Taxation195 statements

14%

Armed Forces and National Security194 statements

14%

21%

Show the data

Policy areas Warnock talks about, as a share of policy statements, against the Senate Democrats average.
Row	Warnock	Peers
Health	41%	27%
Economics and Public Finance	25%	24%
Government Operations and Politics	20%	22%
Taxation	14%	8%
Armed Forces and National Security	14%	21%

How to read the bars

The thick bar is the share of Warnock’s policy statements in an area; the thin grey bar is the average share for Senate Democrats. A statement counts once in each of its areas, so shares can add to more than 100%. The five largest areas are shown; the toggle shows the rest.

Talks about · legislates on

Left: share of statements by policy area. Right: share of bills. Areas in order of their share of statements; both sides run from 0 to 45%. Grey ticks are the Senate Democrats averages.

Show the data

Warnock's share of statements against share of bills in each policy area.
Area	Talks about	Senate Democrats, talks about	Legislates on	Senate Democrats, legislates on
Health	41%	27%	18%	14%
Economics and Public Finance	25%	24%	0%	0%
Government Operations and Politics	20%	22%	7%	9%
Taxation	14%	8%	11%	7%
Armed Forces and National Security	14%	21%	9%	7%

0.63

talk-to-bills agreement, 0 to 1

Senate Democrats average 0.66. Ranks 36th of 45.

What agreement means, and what it doesn’t

Agreement is 1 minus the distance between the two distributions (Jensen–Shannon): 1 means Warnock legislates on exactly the areas Warnock talks about, in the same proportions; 0 means no overlap. It does not say whether the bills match the positions in the statements, only the subjects. Bills Warnock sponsored count fully, cosponsored bills a quarter. Shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.

Ideology

Warnock sits at −1.15 on the CSIP scale, left of 0, more liberal than 54% of Senate Democrats. Approximate range −1.17 to −1.14, which understates the uncertainty; from 225,812 donors and 2,452 roll calls.

CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official, federal and state, on one left–right scale, estimated from roll-call votes, who gives money to whom, and the text of statements. Negative is left of 0, positive right of it; 0 is the centre of the scale, not a definition of “moderate”.

−1.15

CSIP ideal point

Approximate range −1.17 to −1.14. From 225,812 donors and 2,452 roll calls. Run 2026-10-25T215945. Blue is left of 0, red right of 0.

The outlined dot is Warnock, coloured by its side of 0 (blue left, red right, deeper further out); the bar through it is the approximate range (±1.96 standard errors), which understates the uncertainty; the grey ticks below are the medians of Warnock’s groups. 0 is the centre of the scale, not “moderate” by definition.

What this means, and what it doesn’t

The score summarises how an official votes, who funds them and how they talk, relative to everyone else. It does not grade positions as good or bad, and two officials with the same score can differ on any single issue. The ± range is 1.96 standard errors, which understates the uncertainty: scores whose ranges overlap may not differ at all, and even scores whose ranges do not overlap may not differ.

Where Warnock sits

Every official in each group, on the CSIP scale

Senate Democrats45 · median −1.1

All Senate98 · median +0.4

Show the data

Warnock's CSIP score of −1.15 placed against Senate Democrats, All Senate.
Group	Officials	Median	Share left of Warnock
Senate Democrats	45	−1.1	44%
All Senate	98	+0.4	21%

How to read the strips

Every small dot is one official on the same scale, coloured by its own score (blue left of 0, red right of 0, grey at 0, deeper further out) and spread up and down only to keep dots apart; where a group is crowded the dots overlap, and darker patches mean more officials. The large outlined dot is Warnock in every row; the rule is each group’s median. The table under the figure gives the share of each group to the left of Warnock.

Money

Warnock raised $3.6M in the 2026 cycle, above the Senate Democrats’ median of $2.6M. 50% of individual money came in gifts of $200 or less. 23% of itemized individual money came from Georgia.

Campaign money from Federal Election Commission filings, as aggregates only; the lab never shows an individual donor. Campaigns must report by name every person who gives them more than $200 in a cycle (“itemized”); smaller gifts are reported only as one total (“unitemized”), so donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations describe itemized donors only.

2026202420222020

$3.6M

raised in the 2026 cycle

From 4,426 itemized donors. Senate Democrats’ median $2.6M.

Where the money came from

Each square is one percent of 2026-cycle receipts, from FEC summary totals.

Itemized individual (over $200)47 squares$1.7M
Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less)47 squares$1.7M
PACs and other committees3 squares$91.5K
Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds)3 squares$114.8K

Show the data

Sources of Warnock's money, 2026 cycle, one square per percent
Source	Amount	Share
Itemized individual (over $200)	$1.7M	47.3%
Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less)	$1.7M	46.9%
PACs and other committees	$91.5K	2.6%
Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds)	$114.8K	3.2%

What this means, and what it doesn’t

Totals say how much a campaign took in, not how it was spent, and they rise sharply when a seat is up for election; compare cycles with that in mind. The small-donor share understates small giving when a campaign itemizes gifts made through ActBlue or WinRed.

Receipts by cycle

Total receipts, 2020 to 2026. The grey line is the Senate Democrats’ median for 2026.

Show the data

Warnock's receipts by cycle against the 2026 Senate Democrats median.
Item	Value
2020 cycle	$125.4M
2022 cycle	$206.6M
2024 cycle	$4.8M
2026 cycle	$3.6M

Top donor states, 2026

Itemized contributions by donor state. 23% came from Georgia.

Georgia$187.8K
California$183.0K
New York$38.4K
New Jersey$36.9K
Illinois$35.5K

Small donations

Gifts of $200 or less as a share of individual money, by cycle. The thin grey bar is the 2026 Senate Democrats’ median.

0%20%40%60%

Warnock

Median

2026

50%

35%

2024

46%

35%

2022

48%

35%

2020

51%

35%

Show the data

Small-donor share by cycle against the Senate Democrats median
Row	Warnock	Median
2026 cycle	50%	35%
2024 cycle	46%	35%
2022 cycle	48%	35%
2020 cycle	51%	35%

Where itemized donors live

Individuals who gave more than $200, by donor state

Show the data

Warnock's itemized individual contributions by donor state, 2026 cycle
State	Value
Georgia	$187.8K
California	$183.0K
New York	$38.4K
New Jersey	$36.9K
Illinois	$35.5K
Virginia	$26.8K
Colorado	$26.5K
Maryland	$26.0K
Connecticut	$24.6K
Pennsylvania	$24.1K
Texas	$22.1K
Indiana	$21.4K
Ohio	$16.9K
District of Columbia	$15.2K
Michigan	$15.1K
Alabama	$13.2K
Arizona	$12.1K
Wisconsin	$11.9K
Oregon	$11.7K
South Carolina	$11.1K
Massachusetts	$10.8K
Utah	$9,034
Missouri	$8,498
New Mexico	$8,159
Tennessee	$7,866
Hawaii	$6,763
New Hampshire	$5,886
Minnesota	$5,038
Kansas	$4,882
Vermont	$4,769
Maine	$4,225
Kentucky	$3,954
Louisiana	$2,900
West Virginia	$2,242
Rhode Island	$2,216
Iowa	$2,151
North Carolina	$2,125
Idaho	$2,106
Mississippi	$2,010
Delaware	$1,517
Florida	$1,462
Arkansas	$1,328
Nevada	$1,303
Wyoming	$1,260
Nebraska	$940
Alaska	$689
South Dakota	$585
Montana	$488
North Dakota	$180
Washington	No data
Oklahoma	No data

4,426

itemized donors

People who gave more than $200

23%

from Georgia

Of itemized individual dollars

How to read the map

Every state the same size. Darker states gave more itemized money; hatched states had no itemized donors; the outlined state is Georgia. Gifts of $200 or less carry no address and are left out.

Donors’ ideology

Distribution of itemized donors’ own CSIP scores

Show the data

Ideology of Warnock's itemized donors in 2026, from −1.75 to +1.25: 77% between −1.25 and −1.00, 14% between −1.00 and −0.75.
Item	Value
CSIP −1.75 to −1.50	0.1%
CSIP −1.50 to −1.25	3.4%
CSIP −1.25 to −1.00	77%
CSIP −1.00 to −0.75	14%
CSIP −0.75 to −0.50	1.3%
CSIP −0.50 to −0.25	1.3%
CSIP −0.25 to 0.00	0.9%
CSIP 0.00 to +0.25	1.3%
CSIP +0.25 to +0.50	0.5%
CSIP +0.50 to +0.75	0.3%
CSIP +1.00 to +1.25	0.0%

How to read the columns

Donors who give to many candidates get their own CSIP score. Each column is the share of Warnock’s itemized money from donors in that part of the scale, blue left of 0 and red right of 0, deeper further out; Warnock’s own score is −1.15.

Top donor occupations

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

NOT EMPLOYED$576.5K 2,035 donors
RETIRED$113.9K 334 donors
ATTORNEY$68.3K 134 donors
CEO$41.5K 24 donors
PHYSICIAN$31.8K 115 donors

Top committees

PAC and committee contributions, 2026 cycle.

NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL PORK PAC$10.0K
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE$5,000
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OB-GYNS PAC (OB-GYN PAC)$5,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$5,000
HOLLAND & KNIGHT COMMITTEE FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT$5,000

Top employers

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

BLACKROCK$35.0K 12 donors
EMORY UNIVERSITY$4,116 6 donors
MICROSOFT$3,695 7 donors
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$2,770 6 donors
CAPITOL COUNSEL$2,500 3 donors

Aggregates only. Individual donors are never named.

Votes

Warnock voted with the majority of Senate Democrats on 94.8% of party-line votes and missed 2.8% of 915 roll calls. Senate Democrats on average: 95.3% party unity, 97.0% attendance. Across all roll calls, Warnock voted against the majority of Senate Democrats 53 times.

915 roll calls Warnock could vote on in the 119th Congress, compared with Senate Democrats. Attendance is the share with a vote recorded. Party unity counts only party-line roll calls, where most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides, and is the share of those where Warnock voted with the majority of Senate Democrats. The count of votes against that majority covers every roll call where the majority took a side.

votes against the majority of Senate Democrats

Party unity 94.8%, Senate Democrats average 95.3%, ranks 28th of 45. 915 roll calls in the 119th Congress.

Attendance and party unity

The thick bar is Warnock, the thin grey bar the Senate Democrats average. The scale runs from 80% to 100% to show the gap.

80%90%100%

Warnock

Peers

Rank

Attendance

97.1%

97.0%

29th of 45

Party unity

94.8%

95.3%

28th of 45

Show the data

Warnock's attendance and party unity against Senate Democrats.
Row	Warnock	Peers
Attendance	97.1%	97.0%
Party unity	94.8%	95.3%

What this means, and what it doesn’t

A missed roll call has many causes, from illness to campaigning, so attendance says how often, not why. A vote against the majority can be on procedure as well as substance, and many fall on roll calls where both parties split; the key votes below show the ones that decided something.

Key votes

25 roll calls the lab flagged as key in the 119th Congress

Key votes
					Party split (yea–nay)	Why it’s key
Sep 28, 2026	S. 4668 A bill to protect the name, image, and likeness rights of, and provide protections for, student athletes and to promote fair competition among intercollegiate athletics, and for other purposes. On Passage of the Bill	Nay	Against majority	Bill Passed	D 26–19 · R 50–2 · I 1–1Democrats 26 yea, 19 nay; Republicans 50 yea, 2 nay; Independents 1 yea, 1 nay	party crossover
Sep 24, 2026	H.Con.Res. 89 A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. On the Concurrent Resolution	Yea	With majority	Concurrent Resolution Rejected	D 43–1 · R 4–49 · I 2–0Democrats 43 yea, 1 nay; Republicans 4 yea, 49 nay; Independents 2 yea, 0 nay	close vote
Aug 8, 2026	H.R. 6500 An act making continuing appropriations and extensions for fiscal year 2027, and for other purposes. On Passage of the Bill	Yea	With majority	Bill Passed	D 42–3 · R 47–2 · I 1–1Democrats 42 yea, 3 nay; Republicans 47 yea, 2 nay; Independents 1 yea, 1 nay	became law
Aug 7, 2026	H.R. 5334 An act to impose sanctions and other measures with respect to the Russian Federation, as championed by the late Senator Lindsey O. Graham, and for other purposes. On Passage of the Bill	Yea	With majority	Bill Passed	D 36–9 · R 49–1 · I 1–1Democrats 36 yea, 9 nay; Republicans 49 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 1 nay	became law · party crossover
Jul 30, 2026	S.Res. 817 An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar. On the Resolution	Nay	With majority	Resolution Agreed to	D 0–45 · R 50–0 · I 0–2Democrats 0 yea, 45 nay; Republicans 50 yea, 0 nay; Independents 0 yea, 2 nay	close vote

How key votes are chosen

Automatically: a final-passage or override vote where the measure became law, the margin was under 10%, at least 10% of either party voted against its majority, or the bill was among the 25 most mentioned in officials’ own statements. Up to 25 per window, most recent first; five are shown. Bars show yea on the left, nay on the right, per party.

Votes most often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Warnock most often

Jon OssoffD840 shared votes96%
Angela AlsobrooksD874 shared votes95%
Ben LujánD878 shared votes95%
Tammy BaldwinD886 shared votes94%
Tammy DuckworthD832 shared votes94%

Votes least often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Warnock least often

Mike LeeR864 shared votes9.4%
Ron JohnsonR877 shared votes9.7%
Cynthia LummisR861 shared votes9.9%
Rick ScottR887 shared votes10%
Ted CruzR845 shared votes10%

How to read the agreement lists

The share of roll calls both members voted on where they voted the same way, among colleagues sharing at least 50 such votes. High agreement with members of the other party is common on routine votes.

Full voting record

119th Congress (2025–27), loads in batches

Legislation

Warnock sponsored 29 bills in the 119th Congress; none became law. Cosponsored 373 others. 21% of sponsored bills got out of committee (Senate Democrats average 14%; 8th of 45).

The bills Warnock sponsored and cosponsored in the 119th Congress, from the official bill records, and how far each got: introduced, referred to or acted on in committee, passed one chamber, passed both, became law. A bill counts at every stage it has reached, so the blocks only shrink to the right.

Bills by stage

Counts for the 119th Congress

Show the data

Bills Warnock sponsored and cosponsored, by furthest stage reached
Role	Introduced	In committee	Passed one chamber	Passed both chambers	Became law
Sponsored	29	28	3	0	0
Cosponsored	373	369	83	7	6

How to read the blocks

Ink blocks are bills Warnock sponsored, ochre blocks bills Warnock cosponsored; the figure above each block is the count. Most bills in any legislature never leave committee, so a short staircase is the norm.

21%

of sponsored bills got out of committee

Senate Democrats average 14%. Ranks 8th of 45.

Cosponsorship partners

Colleagues who most often cosponsor with Warnock, by number of shared bills in the 119th Congress; the square shows their party.

Amy Klobuchar55
Cory Booker51
Christopher Coons49
Richard Blumenthal48
Jon Ossoff47

What this means, and what it doesn’t

The score is the share of sponsored bills that a committee reported out or a chamber passed, with at least 5 sponsored bills, ranked within the peer group. Members of the majority party and committee chairs move more bills, so the rank reflects position in the chamber as well as effort. Cosponsorship partners are the five colleagues who share the most of Warnock’s bills; the toggle shows more.

Bill list

Sponsored and cosponsored, with status and policy area; five are shown, the toggle shows the rest

RoleFurthest stagePolicy areaIntroduced in this window

Bills sponsored and cosponsored

S. 5690	Renewing the Dream Act	Sponsor	Oct 15, 2026	Introduced	Public Lands and Natural Resources	Under authority of the order of the Senate of September 30, 2026, ordered read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Oct 15, 2026
S.Res. 950	A resolution designating the week of September 14 through September 18, 2026, as "National Clean Energy Week".	Cosponsor	Oct 15, 2026	Introduced	Energy	Under authority of the order of the Senate of September 30, 2026, ordered referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Oct 15, 2026
S. 5661	A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide parity in the taxation of professional sports franchises under the limitation on the deduction for certain employee renumeration, and for other purposes.	Sponsor	Sep 30, 2026	In committee	Taxation	Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. Sep 30, 2026
S.Res. 920	A resolution expressing concern about the growing problem of book banning, and the proliferation of threats to freedom of expression in the United States.	Cosponsor	Sep 29, 2026	In committee	Unassigned	Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S5175-5176) Sep 29, 2026
S.Res. 922	A resolution designating October 26, 2026, as the "Day of the Deployed."	Cosponsor	Sep 29, 2026	Passed one chamber	Armed Forces and National Security	Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5186; text: CR S5176) Sep 29, 2026

Online

A site that changed 79 times in 90 days. Warnock’s official site had 25 pages when last crawled on Oct 18, 2026. The lab last catalogued the images Warnock posted on Oct 1, 2026.

The lab crawls Warnock’s official and campaign websites (weekly for Congress, monthly for the states) and keeps every page’s text, so changes can be read later; it also records social accounts and describes the images Warnock posts with a vision model.

Websites

Official site
www.warnock.senate.gov
Last crawled Oct 18, 2026
25
pages crawled
79
changes in 90 days

How to read the counts

“Pages crawled” is the size of the site at the last crawl; “changes in 90 days” counts pages whose text differed from the previous crawl. Sites change for many routine reasons, such as new press releases, so a high count is not by itself notable.

Social accounts

Images Warnock posted

The latest 24, with model-written descriptions

Two smiling men in suits pose together indoors in front of a framed abstract artwork. There is no prominent text.Oct 1, 2026View post
A CNN Politics news graphic on a white background, with a large bold headline. It contains text but no other prominent imagery.Sep 29, 2026View post
A man in a blue suit speaks at an outdoor press conference, framed by blurred people and cameras. A news banner with text appears across the bottom.Sep 24, 2026View post
A cropped newspaper-style headline graphic with a masthead at the top and a large, three-line headline beneath it.Sep 22, 2026View post
A man in a dark suit raises one hand while addressing a very large outdoor crowd. A tall obelisk and tree-covered hills are visible in the background. The image contains text on signs, but it is not legible.Aug 28, 2026View post

About the descriptions

Written by a vision model and may be wrong. Open the post to see the original. Five are shown; the toggle shows the rest.

Methods and sources

How this page was made. Profile built Oct 28, 2026; site last built Oct 28, 2026. Every number on the page is computed from the sources listed here, by the same rules for every official; nothing is written by hand.

The headline

The headline is the measure on which Warnock is most unusual among Senate Democrats, chosen by one rule for every official of every party. The candidates are the rate of each kind of statement and of extreme labels, party unity, attendance, the small-donor share, the in-state share and total receipts of the latest cycle, the share of sponsored bills that got out of committee, talk-to-bills agreement, and the CSIP score’s place within the party group.

The builder ranks every measure within the same peer group the page compares it with, and writes each official’s percentile: the share of the group below the value, ties counting half, so 0.5 is the median and a value shared by many never ranks first. A measure’s score is how far that percentile sits from the median (0 in the middle, 0.5 at either end), and the highest score leads if it is above 0.25, outside the middle half of the group. Scores within 0.03 of each other are a tie, broken in this order: votes against the party majority, kinds of statement, ideology, roll calls missed, small donations, in-state money, legislation, agreement, extreme labels, receipts.

A measure counts only with at least 200 statements, 100 roll calls or 5 sponsored bills behind it and a peer group of at least 10. Two things never lead: high party unity or attendance, where most members sit, and a high rate of a kind of statement backed by fewer than 10 statements. When nothing qualifies, the headline is a neutral fact instead: statements classified, or years in office. The wording always names the direction (“in the bottom 5% of …”, “votes against the majority of …”).

Identifiers

Profile id: W000790
Bioguide: W000790
FEC candidate ids: S0GA00559

Bulk files with the same data for every official:

Freshness of this profile’s data

What politicians sayOct 27, 20261 days agoMembers of Congress: tweets since 2017; press releases, newsletters and floor speeches since 2022. State legislators: tweets since May 2024. Governors: tweets since January 2025. Labels from an LLM classifier.
Roll calls (Congress)Sep 30, 202628 days agoVoteview roll calls, 113th Congress (2013) on.
Bills (Congress)Oct 22, 20266 days agoGovInfo BILLSTATUS: sponsors, cosponsors, actions, CRS policy area.
Campaign money (FEC)Oct 22, 20266 days agoFEC committee financial summaries (totals, small donations) and itemized contributions (donor counts, states, employers), cycles 2020-2026; aggregates only.
Ideology (CSIP)Oct 25, 20263 days agoCommon-Space Ideal Points (CSIP), current validated run.
WebsitesOct 25, 20263 days agoWeekly crawls of federal sites since April 2026; monthly state crawls since June 2026.
ImagesOct 27, 20261 days agoImages in members' tweets with vision-model descriptions.

How the measures work

What politicians say: Every post, press release, newsletter and congressional floor speech is read by a language model and marked for personal attacks, policy criticism, policy discussion, bipartisanship and credit claiming. A statement can be in several. Rates are shares of statements in the window. The methods paper.
Extreme labels: A statement has an extreme label when it calls a politician, party or policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who the label is aimed at.
Policy areas and agreement: Statements and bills share 25 Congressional Research Service policy areas (state bills are assigned by a language model). Agreement is 1 − Jensen–Shannon distance between the two distributions, shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
Ideology (CSIP): Common-Space Ideal Points place federal and state officials on one left–right scale, estimated jointly from roll calls, campaign contributions and the text of statements, with standard errors. Only a validated run is shown. The methods paper.
Campaign money: Campaigns report by name only donors who give more than $200 in a cycle; smaller gifts are reported as one total. Federal totals and the small-donor share come from the FEC’s financial summaries of each campaign committee. Donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations cover itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift totals, so state figures are itemized only. The lab never publishes donor names.
Votes and key votes: Attendance, party unity and the count of votes against the majority of an official’s own party come from roll calls (Voteview for Congress, chamber records for the states). Key votes are final-passage or override votes that became law, were decided by under 10%, saw at least 10% of a party vote against its majority, or concerned one of the 25 bills most mentioned in officials’ statements.
Peers and ranks: Comparisons are with the same party, chamber and level (for example House Democrats); state legislators are compared within their state and chamber for votes. Every comparison names its group. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; tied values share the average of their ranks, and the percentile is the share of the group below the value, ties counting half.

America’s Political Pulse · Polarization Research Lab

At a glance

What Warnock says

Kinds of statement

Extreme labels

Who gets the labels

Month by month

In Warnock’s words

Examples by category

All 2,031 statements

Policy

What Warnock talks about

Talks about · legislates on

Ideology

Where Warnock sits

Money

Where the money came from

Receipts by cycle

Top donor states, 2026

Small donations

Where itemized donors live

Donors’ ideology

Top donor occupations

Top committees

Top employers

Votes

Attendance and party unity

Key votes

Votes most often with

Votes least often with

Full voting record

Legislation

Bills by stage

Cosponsorship partners

Bill list

Online

Websites

Social accounts

Images Warnock posted

Methods and sources

The headline

Identifiers

Freshness of this profile’s data

How the measures work