The median for State Senate Democrats is $16.2K. Ranks 50th of 55, where 1st raised the most. 15 itemized donors.
Itemized contributions reported to the state in the 2024 cycle, ranked among State Senate Democrats. State filings leave small gifts out, and totals depend on whether the seat is up this cycle.
At a glance
5 measures against State Senate Democrats. 67% of Beebe-Center’s itemized money in the 2024 cycle came from Maine, in the bottom quarter of State Senate Democrats. Beebe-Center sits at −0.88 on the CSIP scale, more liberal than 79% of State Senate Democrats.
The measures on which Beebe-Center sits furthest from the middle of State Senate Democrats, each against the same group, with the CSIP score when there is one. Every number is explained in its own section below.
Itemized, 2024
State Senate Democrats’ median $16.2K · ranks 50th of 55
From Maine, 2024
Of itemized individual dollars · ranks 41st of 47 State Senate Democrats
Party unity
Maine Senate average 93.5% · ranks 5th of 35 · 28 votes against the majority of Maine Senate Democrats
CSIP ideology
More liberal than 79% of State Senate Democrats · ± 0.09
Attendance
Maine Senate average 95.2% · ranks 19th of 35 · 771 roll calls
Statements
Peer group: State Senate Democrats. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; the thick bar is Beebe-Center, the thin grey bar the peer average. The headline is the measure on which Beebe-Center is most unusual among peers (Methods, §08).
What Beebe-Center says
No statements for the ME 2025–26 session.No classified statements (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) in this time window.
Policy
No policy statements for the ME 2025–26 session.No classified statements (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) in this time window.
Ideology
Beebe-Center sits at −0.88 on the CSIP scale, left of 0, more liberal than 79% of State Senate Democrats. Approximate range −0.97 to −0.79, which understates the uncertainty; from 42 donors and 876 roll calls.
CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official, federal and state, on one left–right scale, estimated from roll-call votes, who gives money to whom, and the text of statements. Negative is left of 0, positive right of it; 0 is the centre of the scale, not a definition of “moderate”.
CSIP ideal point
Approximate range −0.97 to −0.79. From 42 donors and 876 roll calls. Run 2026-10-25T215945. Blue is left of 0, red right of 0.
The outlined dot is Beebe-Center, coloured by its side of 0 (blue left, red right, deeper further out); the bar through it is the approximate range (±1.96 standard errors), which understates the uncertainty; the grey ticks below are the medians of Beebe-Center’s groups. 0 is the centre of the scale, not “moderate” by definition.
What this means, and what it doesn’t
The score summarises how an official votes, who funds them and how they talk, relative to everyone else. It does not grade positions as good or bad, and two officials with the same score can differ on any single issue. The ± range is 1.96 standard errors, which understates the uncertainty: scores whose ranges overlap may not differ at all, and even scores whose ranges do not overlap may not differ.
Where Beebe-Center sits
Every official in each group, on the CSIP scale
Show the data
| Group | Officials | Median | Share left of Beebe-Center |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Senate Democrats | 825 | −0.7 | 20% |
| Maine Senate | 35 | −0.5 | 3% |
| All State Senate | 1909 | +0.1 | 9% |
How to read the strips
Every small dot is one official on the same scale, coloured by its own score (blue left of 0, red right of 0, grey at 0, deeper further out) and spread up and down only to keep dots apart; where a group is crowded the dots overlap, and darker patches mean more officials. The large outlined dot is Beebe-Center in every row; the rule is each group’s median. The table under the figure gives the share of each group to the left of Beebe-Center.
Money
Beebe-Center reported $1,500 in the 2024 cycle, 9.3% of the State Senate Democrats’ median of $16.2K. State filings report no small-donation total. 67% of itemized individual money came from Maine.
Campaign money from state campaign-finance filings, as aggregates only; the lab never shows an individual donor. Campaigns must report by name every person who gives them more than $200 in a cycle (“itemized”); smaller gifts are reported only as one total (“unitemized”), so donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations describe itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift total, so these figures add up itemized contributions only.
itemized in the 2024 cycle
From 15 itemized donors. State Senate Democrats’ median $16.2K.
Where the money came from
Each square is one percent of itemized contributions in the 2024 cycle.
- Individuals (itemized)100 squares$1,500
Show the data
| Source | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Individuals (itemized) | $1,500 | 100.0% |
What this means, and what it doesn’t
Totals say how much a campaign took in, not how it was spent, and they rise sharply when a seat is up for election; compare cycles with that in mind.
Receipts by cycle
Itemized contributions, 2022 to 2024. The grey line is the State Senate Democrats’ median for 2024.
Show the data
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| 2022 cycle | $3,000 |
| 2024 cycle | $1,500 |
Top donor states, 2024
Itemized contributions by donor state. 67% came from Maine.
- Maine$1,000
- Massachusetts$200
- Virginia$100
- Connecticut$100
- Rhode Island$100
Small donations
State filings report no total for small gifts.
Not reported in state filings.
Where itemized donors live
Individuals who gave more than $200, by donor state
Show the data
| State | Value |
|---|---|
| Maine | $1,000 |
| Massachusetts | $200 |
| Rhode Island | $100 |
| Connecticut | $100 |
| Virginia | $100 |
| Alaska | No data |
| Vermont | No data |
| New Hampshire | No data |
| Washington | No data |
| Idaho | No data |
| Montana | No data |
| North Dakota | No data |
| Minnesota | No data |
| Illinois | No data |
| Wisconsin | No data |
| Michigan | No data |
| New York | No data |
| Oregon | No data |
| Nevada | No data |
| Wyoming | No data |
| South Dakota | No data |
| Iowa | No data |
| Indiana | No data |
| Ohio | No data |
| Pennsylvania | No data |
| New Jersey | No data |
| California | No data |
| Utah | No data |
| Colorado | No data |
| Nebraska | No data |
| Missouri | No data |
| Kentucky | No data |
| West Virginia | No data |
| Maryland | No data |
| Delaware | No data |
| Arizona | No data |
| New Mexico | No data |
| Kansas | No data |
| Arkansas | No data |
| Tennessee | No data |
| North Carolina | No data |
| South Carolina | No data |
| District of Columbia | No data |
| Oklahoma | No data |
| Louisiana | No data |
| Mississippi | No data |
| Alabama | No data |
| Georgia | No data |
| Hawaii | No data |
| Texas | No data |
| Florida | No data |
itemized donors
People who gave more than $200
from Maine
Of itemized individual dollars
How to read the map
Every state the same size. Darker states gave more itemized money; hatched states had no itemized donors; the outlined state is Maine. Gifts of $200 or less carry no address and are left out.
Top donor occupations
Itemized, 2024 cycle.
- OTHER$900 9 donors
Top committees
PAC and committee contributions, 2024 cycle.
No committee contributions this cycle.
Top employers
Itemized, 2024 cycle.
No employers reported.
Aggregates only. Individual donors are never named.
Votes
Beebe-Center voted with the majority of Maine Senate Democrats on 98.1% of party-line votes and missed 3.4% of 771 roll calls. Maine Senate on average: 93.5% party unity, 95.2% attendance. Across all roll calls, Beebe-Center voted against the majority of Maine Senate Democrats 28 times.
771 roll calls Beebe-Center could vote on in the ME 2025–26 session, compared with Maine Senate. Attendance is the share with a vote recorded. Party unity counts only party-line roll calls, where most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides, and is the share of those where Beebe-Center voted with the majority of Maine Senate Democrats. The count of votes against that majority covers every roll call where the majority took a side.
votes against the majority of Maine Senate Democrats
Party unity 98.1%, Maine Senate average 93.5%, ranks 5th of 35. 771 roll calls in the ME 2025–26 session.
Attendance and party unity
The thick bar is Beebe-Center, the thin grey bar the Maine Senate average. The scale runs from 80% to 100% to show the gap.
Show the data
| Row | Beebe-Center | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 96.6% | 95.2% |
| Party unity | 98.1% | 93.5% |
What this means, and what it doesn’t
A missed roll call has many causes, from illness to campaigning, so attendance says how often, not why. A vote against the majority can be on procedure as well as substance, and many fall on roll calls where both parties split; the key votes below show the ones that decided something.
Key votes
25 roll calls the lab flagged as key in the ME 2025–26 session
| Party split (yea–nay) | Why it’s key | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026 | LD 127 An Act To Strengthen Legislative Oversight Of Government Agencies And Programs By Reaffirming The Legislature'S Access To Confidential Records RECEDE AND CONCUR | Nay | Against majority | pass | D 10–9 · R 11–0 · I 1–0Democrats 10 yea, 9 nay; Republicans 11 yea, 0 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | party crossover |
| Apr 14, 2026 | LD 299 An Act To Support Investment In Agriculture ADOPT SENATE AMENDMENT (S-717) to COMMITTEE AMENDMENT | Nay | With majority | fail | D 3–17 · R 14–0Democrats 3 yea, 17 nay; Republicans 14 yea, 0 nay | close vote · party crossover |
| Apr 14, 2026 | LD 493 An Act To Expand Testing For Perfluoroalkyl And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances To Private Drinking Water Wells ENACTMENT | Yea | With majority | pass | D 20–0 · R 0–13 · I 1–0Democrats 20 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 0 yea, 13 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | became law |
| Apr 14, 2026 | Yea | With majority | pass | D 20–0 · R 8–6 · I 1–0Democrats 20 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 8 yea, 6 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | party crossover | |
| Apr 14, 2026 | LD 2054 An Act To Clarify The Laws Regarding Moose Hunting Permits For Hunting Outfitters RECEDE AND CONCUR | Yea | With majority | pass | D 12–8 · R 11–2 · I 1–0Democrats 12 yea, 8 nay; Republicans 11 yea, 2 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | became law · party crossover |
How key votes are chosen
Automatically: a final-passage or override vote where the measure became law, the margin was under 10%, at least 10% of either party voted against its majority, or the bill was among the 25 most mentioned in officials’ own statements. Up to 25 per window, most recent first; five are shown. Bars show yea on the left, nay on the right, per party.
Votes most often with
The colleagues who voted the same way as Beebe-Center most often
- Anne CarneyD703 shared votes96%
- Peggy RotundoD694 shared votes96%
- Henry IngwersenD743 shared votes95%
- Denise TeplerD735 shared votes95%
- Donna BaileyD745 shared votes94%
Votes least often with
The colleagues who voted the same way as Beebe-Center least often
- Joe MartinR735 shared votes11%
- Jeff TimberlakeR676 shared votes12%
- David HagganR741 shared votes12%
- Trey StewartR701 shared votes13%
- Dick BradstreetR726 shared votes13%
How to read the agreement lists
The share of roll calls both members voted on where they voted the same way, among colleagues sharing at least 50 such votes. High agreement with members of the other party is common on routine votes.
Full voting record
ME 2025–26 session, loads in batches
Legislation
No bills for the ME 2025–26 session.No sponsored or cosponsored bills are recorded for this official in this time window.
Online
A site that has not changed in 90 days. Beebe-Center’s official site had 1 page when last crawled on Oct 1, 2026.
The lab crawls Beebe-Center’s official and campaign websites (weekly for Congress, monthly for the states) and keeps every page’s text, so changes can be read later; it also records social accounts and describes the images Beebe-Center posts with a vision model.
Websites
- 1
pages crawled
0changes in 90 days
How to read the counts
“Pages crawled” is the size of the site at the last crawl; “changes in 90 days” counts pages whose text differed from the previous crawl. Sites change for many routine reasons, such as new press releases, so a high count is not by itself notable.
Social accounts
Images Beebe-Center posted
No images from Beebe-Center’s posts have been described.
About the descriptions
Written by a vision model and may be wrong. Open the post to see the original. Five are shown; the toggle shows the rest.
State floor speeches
11 turns, Mar 30, 2023 to Mar 27, 2025
Floor speeches
Transcribed from chamber video or captions by the lab. They are not classified for kinds of statement.
Methods and sources
How this page was made. Profile built Oct 28, 2026; site last built Oct 28, 2026. Every number on the page is computed from the sources listed here, by the same rules for every official; nothing is written by hand.
The headline
The headline is the measure on which Beebe-Center is most unusual among State Senate Democrats, chosen by one rule for every official of every party. The candidates are the rate of each kind of statement and of extreme labels, party unity, attendance, the small-donor share, the in-state share and total receipts of the latest cycle, the share of sponsored bills that got out of committee, talk-to-bills agreement, and the CSIP score’s place within the party group.
The builder ranks every measure within the same peer group the page compares it with, and writes each official’s percentile: the share of the group below the value, ties counting half, so 0.5 is the median and a value shared by many never ranks first. A measure’s score is how far that percentile sits from the median (0 in the middle, 0.5 at either end), and the highest score leads if it is above 0.25, outside the middle half of the group. Scores within 0.03 of each other are a tie, broken in this order: votes against the party majority, kinds of statement, ideology, roll calls missed, small donations, in-state money, legislation, agreement, extreme labels, receipts.
A measure counts only with at least 200 statements, 100 roll calls or 5 sponsored bills behind it and a peer group of at least 10. Two things never lead: high party unity or attendance, where most members sit, and a high rate of a kind of statement backed by fewer than 10 statements. When nothing qualifies, the headline is a neutral fact instead: statements classified, or years in office. The wording always names the direction (“in the bottom 5% of …”, “votes against the majority of …”).
Identifiers
- Profile id
- db11e611-94a4-4451-8486-f941a532789d
- Open States
- ocd-person/db11e611-94a4-4451-8486-f941a532789d
Bulk files with the same data for every official:
Freshness of this profile’s data
- What politicians sayOct 27, 20261 days agoMembers of Congress: tweets since 2017; press releases, newsletters and floor speeches since 2022. State legislators: tweets since May 2024. Governors: tweets since January 2025. Labels from an LLM classifier.
- Roll calls (state)Oct 21, 20267 days agoOpen States floor roll calls, 2019 on (none for AK and MO).
- Bills (state)Oct 28, 2026todayOpen States bills and sponsors, 2019 on; stages from roll calls.
- Campaign money (state)no dateState campaign-finance agencies, 2019 on; aggregates only.
- Ideology (CSIP)Oct 25, 20263 days agoCommon-Space Ideal Points (CSIP), current validated run.
- WebsitesOct 25, 20263 days agoWeekly crawls of federal sites since April 2026; monthly state crawls since June 2026.
- State floor speechesOct 21, 20267 days agoState floor speech turns (published transcripts and captions), 2020 on; not LLM-classified.
How the measures work
- What politicians say
- Every post, press release, newsletter and congressional floor speech is read by a language model and marked for personal attacks, policy criticism, policy discussion, bipartisanship and credit claiming. A statement can be in several. Rates are shares of statements in the window. The methods paper.
- Extreme labels
- A statement has an extreme label when it calls a politician, party or policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who the label is aimed at.
- Policy areas and agreement
- Statements and bills share 25 Congressional Research Service policy areas (state bills are assigned by a language model). Agreement is 1 − Jensen–Shannon distance between the two distributions, shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
- Ideology (CSIP)
- Common-Space Ideal Points place federal and state officials on one left–right scale, estimated jointly from roll calls, campaign contributions and the text of statements, with standard errors. Only a validated run is shown. The methods paper.
- Campaign money
- Campaigns report by name only donors who give more than $200 in a cycle; smaller gifts are reported as one total. Federal totals and the small-donor share come from the FEC’s financial summaries of each campaign committee. Donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations cover itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift totals, so state figures are itemized only. The lab never publishes donor names.
- Votes and key votes
- Attendance, party unity and the count of votes against the majority of an official’s own party come from roll calls (Voteview for Congress, chamber records for the states). Key votes are final-passage or override votes that became law, were decided by under 10%, saw at least 10% of a party vote against its majority, or concerned one of the 25 bills most mentioned in officials’ statements.
- Peers and ranks
- Comparisons are with the same party, chamber and level (for example House Democrats); state legislators are compared within their state and chamber for votes. Every comparison names its group. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; tied values share the average of their ranks, and the percentile is the share of the group below the value, ties counting half.
America’s Political Pulse · Polarization Research Lab