Skip to content

2026 midterms · Candidate

Republican · Candidate · U.S. House, Missouri’s 6th District · Incumbent

Portrait of Samuel Graves Jr., rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
5,529
statements classified

On none of the five kinds of statement does Graves sit outside the middle half of the 221 Republican House incumbents.

An AI model reads everything Graves publishes in office (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) and marks five kinds of statement; the rates are compared below.

Samuel Graves Jr. R · MOMissouri 6th District · FEC H0MO06073 · Bioguide G000546Official profile →

What Graves says

5,529 of Graves’s statements are classified. On none of the five kinds of statement does Graves sit outside the middle half of the 221 Republican House incumbents.

An AI model reads everything Graves publishes in office and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 221 Republican House incumbents with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Graves among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How often does Graves make each kind of statement?

Share of statements: Graves (thick bar) against the Republican House incumbents average (thin grey bar)

0%70%
Graves
Average
Rank
Personal attacks
1.0%
2.4%
136th of 221
Policy criticism
22%
18%
61st of 221
Policy discussion
66%
61%
57th of 221
Bipartisanship
6.6%
5.4%
65th of 221
Credit claiming
18%
22%
152nd of 221
Show the data
Graves’s share of statements of each kind, against the Republican House incumbents average: Personal attacks 1.0%, Policy criticism 22%, Policy discussion 66%, Bipartisanship 6.6%, Credit claiming 18%.
RowGravesAverage
Personal attacks1.0%2.4%
Policy criticism22%18%
Policy discussion66%61%
Bipartisanship6.6%5.4%
Credit claiming18%22%
5,529

statements classified

From everything they publish in office: posts, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches.

This compares Graves with other candidates. Graves’s official profile compares Graves with fellow office-holders and has every statement, vote and bill.

The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Totals the campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle, as filed.

No FEC figures are on file for this candidate.

Back to topNext: Online

Online

Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.

No engagement figures are on file for this account.

Back to topNext: The race

The race

Missouri 6th District: Graves is not among the candidates recorded as advancing from this primary. Primary Aug 4, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.

This race is not among the races the lab lists as rated toss-up or leaning.

Who else is on the list?

Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary

The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in Missouri

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.

The statements. As an incumbent member of Congress, this candidate is measured on everything the lab collects from them in office: posts on X, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.

The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Identifiers. FEC candidate id H0MO06073 (FEC record). Bioguide id G000546. First FEC filing Jun 5, 2000.

Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected.

About the data →

Back to top