Skip to content

2026 midterms · Candidate

Republican · Candidate · U.S. House, Utah’s 4th District · Incumbent

Portrait of Burgess Owens, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
8,448
statements classified

On none of the five kinds of statement does Owens sit outside the middle half of the 221 Republican House incumbents.

An AI model reads everything Owens publishes in office (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) and marks five kinds of statement; the rates are compared below.

What Owens says

8,448 of Owens’s statements are classified. On none of the five kinds of statement does Owens sit outside the middle half of the 221 Republican House incumbents.

An AI model reads everything Owens publishes in office and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 221 Republican House incumbents with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Owens among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How often does Owens make each kind of statement?

Share of statements: Owens (thick bar) against the Republican House incumbents average (thin grey bar)

0%70%
Owens
Average
Rank
Personal attacks
2.5%
2.4%
79th of 221
Policy criticism
19%
18%
98th of 221
Policy discussion
60%
61%
121st of 221
Bipartisanship
4.2%
5.4%
125th of 221
Credit claiming
26%
22%
65th of 221
Show the data
Owens’s share of statements of each kind, against the Republican House incumbents average: Personal attacks 2.5%, Policy criticism 19%, Policy discussion 60%, Bipartisanship 4.2%, Credit claiming 26%.
RowOwensAverage
Personal attacks2.5%2.4%
Policy criticism19%18%
Policy discussion60%61%
Bipartisanship4.2%5.4%
Credit claiming26%22%
8,448

statements classified

From everything they publish in office: posts, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches.

This compares Owens with other candidates. Owens’s official profile compares Owens with fellow office-holders and has every statement, vote and bill.

The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Totals the campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle, as filed.

No FEC figures are on file for this candidate.

Back to topNext: Online

Online

Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.

No engagement figures are on file for this account.

Back to topNext: The race

The race

Utah 4th District: Owens is not among the candidates recorded as advancing from this primary. Primary Jun 30, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.

This race is not among the races the lab lists as rated toss-up or leaning.

Who else is on the list?

Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary

The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in Utah

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.

The statements. As an incumbent member of Congress, this candidate is measured on everything the lab collects from them in office: posts on X, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.

The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Identifiers. FEC candidate id H0UT04076 (FEC record). Bioguide id O000086. First FEC filing Nov 4, 2019.

Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected.

About the data →

Back to top