2026 midterms · Candidate
Democrat · Candidate · U.S. House, New York’s 4th District · Challenger
The highest of 139 Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates (their average is 2.4%; Gillen ranks 1st of 139, where 1st is the highest rate), from 925 statements.
An AI model reads each of Gillen’s posts on X and marks whether each stresses working across party lines; the rate is the share marked.
What Gillen says
15% of Gillen’s statements use bipartisan language, the highest of 139 Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates. Their average is 2.4%.
An AI model reads Gillen’s posts on X and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 139 Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Gillen among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.
How often does Gillen make each kind of statement?
Share of statements: Gillen (thick bar) against the Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates average (thin grey bar)
Show the data
| Row | Gillen | Average |
|---|---|---|
| Personal attacks | 1.2% | 5.3% |
| Policy criticism | 13% | 14% |
| Policy discussion | 65% | 40% |
| Bipartisanship | 15% | 2.4% |
| Credit claiming | 27% | 9.4% |
statements classified
From their posts on X.
Awards
- Bipartisanship LeaderTop 3% in bipartisan language among all ranked candidates, the lab’s rule.
This compares Gillen with other candidates. Gillen’s official profile compares Gillen with fellow office-holders and has every statement, vote and bill.
The five kinds of statement
Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.
Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.
Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).
Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.
Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.
Money
Gillen reports $6.2M raised and $3.2M cash on hand. No other candidate on this race’s list has FEC figures to compare.
Totals the campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle, as filed.
Raised
Spent
Cash on hand
Where has Gillen’s money come from?
Receipts by source, as reported to the FEC
Show the data
| Part | Value |
|---|---|
| Individuals | $3.8M |
| PACs | $1.3M |
| Party committees | $5,634 |
| Own money | $0 |
| Candidate loans | $0 |
Notes
Online
Gillen’s posts on X from Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. Followers and the average likes and views per post, from the posts the lab has collected.
Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.
Followers
Likes per post
Views per post
The race
New York 4th District: Gillen advanced from the primary. Primary Jun 23, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.
Rated lean democratic. Cook Political Report ratings, entered by the lab (last updated by the lab on Jun 24, 2026); a forecaster’s judgement about the general election, not the lab’s.
Who else is on the list?
Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary
No other candidate is listed for this race.
The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in New York
Methods and sources
The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.
The statements. This candidate is measured on the posts on X the lab collects for the campaign. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.
The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.
Identifiers. FEC candidate id H2NY04244 (FEC record). Bioguide id G000602. First FEC filing Feb 24, 2022.
Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected, the latest from Oct 23, 2026.