Skip to content

Democrat · U.S. House, Hawaii’s 2nd district

Serving since Jan 3, 2023119th Congress (2025–27)next election Nov 3, 2026

Bioguide T000487FEC H2HI02581

Portrait of Jill Tokuda, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
0.3%
of statements use an extreme label, in the bottom quarter of House Democrats

0.3% of 717 statements use an extreme label (2 statements); the average for House Democrats is 1.9%. Ranks 191st of 216, where 1st is the highest rate. Most often aimed at Medicaid cuts.

An AI model reads each of Tokuda’s press releases, posts on X, Congressional Record speeches and newsletters and marks whether it calls a politician, party or policy far left, far right, MAGA, extreme, radical, woke, fascist or communist. The rate is the share of statements marked; it is compared with the average among House Democrats and ranked against the same group.

At a glance

6 measures against House Democrats. Tokuda raised $985.9K in the 2026 cycle, in the bottom quarter of House Democrats (median $2.0M). 2.6% of Tokuda’s statements contain a personal attack, in the bottom quarter of House Democrats (average 6.6%).

The measures on which Tokuda sits furthest from the middle of House Democrats, each against the same group, with the CSIP score when there is one. Every number is explained in its own section below.

Party unity

99.7%

House Democrats average 96.4% · ranks 19th of 217 · 8 votes against the majority of House Democrats

Attendance

99.8%

House Democrats average 96.9% · ranks 23rd of 217 · 674 roll calls

Extreme labels

0.3%

House Democrats average 1.9% · ranks 191st of 216

Raised, 2026

$985.9K

House Democrats’ median $2.0M · ranks 179th of 214

Personal attacks

2.6%

House Democrats average 6.6% · ranks 168th of 216

CSIP ideology

−1.14

More liberal than 71% of House Democrats · ± 0.03

Peer group: House Democrats. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; the thick bar is Tokuda, the thin grey bar the peer average. The headline is the measure on which Tokuda is most unusual among peers (Methods, §08).

Back to topNext: What politicians say

What Tokuda says

Tokuda attacks opponents personally less than 77% of House Democrats. Personal attacks in 2.6% of 717 statements, against 6.6% for the average House Democrat; 168th of 216.

An AI model reads each of Tokuda’s 717 statements in the 119th Congress (487 posts on X, 126 press releases, 89 Congressional Record speeches, 15 newsletters) and marks the kinds of statement it contains: a personal attack, criticism of a policy, discussion of policy, bipartisanship, credit claiming, and extreme labels. A statement can carry several. Every rate is compared with the average for House Democrats and ranked among them.

Kinds of statement

Share of statements carrying each label, the 119th Congress

0%80%
Tokuda
Peers
Rank
Policy discussion520 statements
73%
73%
131st of 216
Policy criticism197 statements
27%
28%
123rd of 216
Credit claiming151 statements
21%
23%
115th of 216
Bipartisanship74 statements
10%
10%
77th of 216
Personal attacks19 statements
3%
7%
168th of 216
Show the data
Tokuda's share of statements in each category against the House Democrats average.
RowTokudaPeers
Policy discussion73%73%
Policy criticism27%28%
Credit claiming21%23%
Bipartisanship10%10%
Personal attacks3%7%
717

statements classified

487 posts on X, 126 press releases, 89 Congressional Record speeches, 15 newsletters.

posts on X: 487 (67.9%)posts on X 487press releases: 126 (17.6%)Congressional Record speeches: 89 (12.4%)newsletters: 15 (2.1%)
Show the data
Tokuda's statements by source
PartValue
posts on X487
press releases126
Congressional Record speeches89
newsletters15
How to read the bars

The thick bar is Tokuda; the thin grey bar is the average House Democrats. A longer thick bar means Tokuda does this more than peers. Rank 1 is the highest rate in the group.

Extreme labels

Tokuda used extreme labels in 0.3% of statements, 15% of the peer average. 2 statements, most often aimed at Medicaid cuts; peers 1.9%.

  1. “extreme”2

Who gets the labels

Targets named alongside an extreme label, by number of statements

  1. Medicaid cuts1
  2. Trump Administration1
What an extreme label is

Calls a politician, a party or a policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who or what the label was aimed at. The lists show the five most used labels and targets; the toggle shows the rest.

Month by month

Share of statements per month, the 119th Congress

Statements2025-01: 432025-02: 362025-03: 452025-04: 382025-05: 322025-06: 392025-07: 342025-08: 362025-09: 322025-10: 262025-11: 252025-12: 292026-01: 332026-02: 362026-03: 392026-04: 462026-05: 242026-06: 242026-07: 442026-08: 142026-09: 292026-10: 13peak 46 · Apr ’26Personal attackspeak 8.3% · Feb ’25 · latest 0.0%Personal attacks, 2025-01: 2.3% of 43Personal attacks, 2025-02: 8.3% of 36Personal attacks, 2025-03: 6.7% of 45Personal attacks, 2025-04: 5.3% of 38Personal attacks, 2025-05: 6.3% of 32Personal attacks, 2025-06: 0.0% of 39Personal attacks, 2025-07: 0.0% of 34Personal attacks, 2025-08: 0.0% of 36Personal attacks, 2025-09: 3.1% of 32Personal attacks, 2025-10: 0.0% of 26Personal attacks, 2025-11: 4.0% of 25Personal attacks, 2025-12: 0.0% of 29Personal attacks, 2026-01: 6.1% of 33Personal attacks, 2026-02: 0.0% of 36Personal attacks, 2026-03: 0.0% of 39Personal attacks, 2026-04: 4.3% of 46Personal attacks, 2026-05: 4.2% of 24Personal attacks, 2026-06: 0.0% of 24Personal attacks, 2026-07: 2.3% of 44Personal attacks, 2026-08: 0.0% of 14Personal attacks, 2026-09: 0.0% of 29Personal attacks, 2026-10: 0.0% of 13Policy criticismpeak 57.7% · Oct ’25 · latest 15.4%Policy criticism, 2025-01: 18.6% of 43Policy criticism, 2025-02: 47.2% of 36Policy criticism, 2025-03: 33.3% of 45Policy criticism, 2025-04: 31.6% of 38Policy criticism, 2025-05: 37.5% of 32Policy criticism, 2025-06: 33.3% of 39Policy criticism, 2025-07: 47.1% of 34Policy criticism, 2025-08: 25.0% of 36Policy criticism, 2025-09: 21.9% of 32Policy criticism, 2025-10: 57.7% of 26Policy criticism, 2025-11: 24.0% of 25Policy criticism, 2025-12: 31.0% of 29Policy criticism, 2026-01: 12.1% of 33Policy criticism, 2026-02: 30.6% of 36Policy criticism, 2026-03: 17.9% of 39Policy criticism, 2026-04: 19.6% of 46Policy criticism, 2026-05: 12.5% of 24Policy criticism, 2026-06: 33.3% of 24Policy criticism, 2026-07: 9.1% of 44Policy criticism, 2026-08: 0.0% of 14Policy criticism, 2026-09: 34.5% of 29Policy criticism, 2026-10: 15.4% of 13Policy discussionpeak 93.1% · Sep ’26 · latest 76.9%Policy discussion, 2025-01: 76.7% of 43Policy discussion, 2025-02: 66.7% of 36Policy discussion, 2025-03: 60.0% of 45Policy discussion, 2025-04: 68.4% of 38Policy discussion, 2025-05: 71.9% of 32Policy discussion, 2025-06: 84.6% of 39Policy discussion, 2025-07: 88.2% of 34Policy discussion, 2025-08: 83.3% of 36Policy discussion, 2025-09: 56.3% of 32Policy discussion, 2025-10: 88.5% of 26Policy discussion, 2025-11: 72.0% of 25Policy discussion, 2025-12: 79.3% of 29Policy discussion, 2026-01: 84.9% of 33Policy discussion, 2026-02: 66.7% of 36Policy discussion, 2026-03: 61.5% of 39Policy discussion, 2026-04: 63.0% of 46Policy discussion, 2026-05: 58.3% of 24Policy discussion, 2026-06: 70.8% of 24Policy discussion, 2026-07: 61.4% of 44Policy discussion, 2026-08: 85.7% of 14Policy discussion, 2026-09: 93.1% of 29Policy discussion, 2026-10: 76.9% of 13Bipartisanshippeak 28.1% · Sep ’25 · latest 0.0%Bipartisanship, 2025-01: 11.6% of 43Bipartisanship, 2025-02: 2.8% of 36Bipartisanship, 2025-03: 11.1% of 45Bipartisanship, 2025-04: 13.2% of 38Bipartisanship, 2025-05: 3.1% of 32Bipartisanship, 2025-06: 10.3% of 39Bipartisanship, 2025-07: 5.9% of 34Bipartisanship, 2025-08: 2.8% of 36Bipartisanship, 2025-09: 28.1% of 32Bipartisanship, 2025-10: 15.4% of 26Bipartisanship, 2025-11: 28.0% of 25Bipartisanship, 2025-12: 17.2% of 29Bipartisanship, 2026-01: 18.2% of 33Bipartisanship, 2026-02: 8.3% of 36Bipartisanship, 2026-03: 5.1% of 39Bipartisanship, 2026-04: 10.9% of 46Bipartisanship, 2026-05: 12.5% of 24Bipartisanship, 2026-06: 12.5% of 24Bipartisanship, 2026-07: 4.5% of 44Bipartisanship, 2026-08: 0.0% of 14Bipartisanship, 2026-09: 3.5% of 29Bipartisanship, 2026-10: 0.0% of 13Credit claimingpeak 48.8% · Jan ’25 · latest 15.4%Credit claiming, 2025-01: 48.8% of 43Credit claiming, 2025-02: 27.8% of 36Credit claiming, 2025-03: 24.4% of 45Credit claiming, 2025-04: 13.2% of 38Credit claiming, 2025-05: 21.9% of 32Credit claiming, 2025-06: 25.6% of 39Credit claiming, 2025-07: 26.5% of 34Credit claiming, 2025-08: 25.0% of 36Credit claiming, 2025-09: 6.3% of 32Credit claiming, 2025-10: 11.5% of 26Credit claiming, 2025-11: 28.0% of 25Credit claiming, 2025-12: 24.1% of 29Credit claiming, 2026-01: 33.3% of 33Credit claiming, 2026-02: 8.3% of 36Credit claiming, 2026-03: 10.3% of 39Credit claiming, 2026-04: 21.7% of 46Credit claiming, 2026-05: 20.8% of 24Credit claiming, 2026-06: 33.3% of 24Credit claiming, 2026-07: 9.1% of 44Credit claiming, 2026-08: 0.0% of 14Credit claiming, 2026-09: 10.3% of 29Credit claiming, 2026-10: 15.4% of 13Extreme labelspeak 4.2% · May ’26 · latest 0.0%Extreme labels, 2025-01: 0.0% of 43Extreme labels, 2025-02: 2.8% of 36Extreme labels, 2025-03: 0.0% of 45Extreme labels, 2025-04: 0.0% of 38Extreme labels, 2025-05: 0.0% of 32Extreme labels, 2025-06: 0.0% of 39Extreme labels, 2025-07: 0.0% of 34Extreme labels, 2025-08: 0.0% of 36Extreme labels, 2025-09: 0.0% of 32Extreme labels, 2025-10: 0.0% of 26Extreme labels, 2025-11: 0.0% of 25Extreme labels, 2025-12: 0.0% of 29Extreme labels, 2026-01: 0.0% of 33Extreme labels, 2026-02: 0.0% of 36Extreme labels, 2026-03: 0.0% of 39Extreme labels, 2026-04: 0.0% of 46Extreme labels, 2026-05: 4.2% of 24Extreme labels, 2026-06: 0.0% of 24Extreme labels, 2026-07: 0.0% of 44Extreme labels, 2026-08: 0.0% of 14Extreme labels, 2026-09: 0.0% of 29Extreme labels, 2026-10: 0.0% of 13Jan ’25Jul ’25Jan ’26Jul ’26Oct ’26
Show the data
Monthly rates for Tokuda, each row shaded against its own peak, with statement volume. Months with fewer than 10 statements are left blank.
ColumnStatementsPersonal attacksPolicy criticismPolicy discussionBipartisanshipCredit claimingExtreme labels
Jan ’25432.3%18.6%76.7%11.6%48.8%0.0%
Feb ’25368.3%47.2%66.7%2.8%27.8%2.8%
Mar ’25456.7%33.3%60.0%11.1%24.4%0.0%
Apr ’25385.3%31.6%68.4%13.2%13.2%0.0%
May ’25326.3%37.5%71.9%3.1%21.9%0.0%
Jun ’25390.0%33.3%84.6%10.3%25.6%0.0%
Jul ’25340.0%47.1%88.2%5.9%26.5%0.0%
Aug ’25360.0%25.0%83.3%2.8%25.0%0.0%
Sep ’25323.1%21.9%56.3%28.1%6.3%0.0%
Oct ’25260.0%57.7%88.5%15.4%11.5%0.0%
Nov ’25254.0%24.0%72.0%28.0%28.0%0.0%
Dec ’25290.0%31.0%79.3%17.2%24.1%0.0%
Jan ’26336.1%12.1%84.9%18.2%33.3%0.0%
Feb ’26360.0%30.6%66.7%8.3%8.3%0.0%
Mar ’26390.0%17.9%61.5%5.1%10.3%0.0%
Apr ’26464.3%19.6%63.0%10.9%21.7%0.0%
May ’26244.2%12.5%58.3%12.5%20.8%4.2%
Jun ’26240.0%33.3%70.8%12.5%33.3%0.0%
Jul ’26442.3%9.1%61.4%4.5%9.1%0.0%
Aug ’26140.0%0.0%85.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Sep ’26290.0%34.5%93.1%3.5%10.3%0.0%
Oct ’26130.0%15.4%76.9%0.0%15.4%0.0%
How to read the strips

Each row is one kind of statement; each cell is a month, shaded against that row’s own peak (darker = closer to the peak), with the peak and the latest value written at the right. The top row counts statements. The strip covers every month of the 119th Congress, the same span as the rates above, including months with no statements. A month with fewer than 10 statements is hatched, not shaded: one or two posts would swing its rate to 0% or 100%.

In Tokuda’s words

Real statements from the classifier’s example set, with the labels it assigned

Credit claiming

Tokuda, Warnock, and Sherman Call for Federal Audit of Refunds of $166 Billion in Illegal Trump Tariffs HAWAI?I — U.S. Representative Jill N. Tokuda (HI-02), alongside U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock (D-GA), the Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Subcommittee on International Trade, Customs, and Glo…

Oct 21, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; credit claiming; Foreign Trade and International Finance; Government Operations and Politics; Housing and Community Development · Source

Personal attacks

The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.

Jul 17, 2026 · Posts on X · personal attacks; policy discussion; Agriculture and Food; Energy; Health; Government Operations and Politics; target: Donald Trump · Source

Extreme label

Rep. Tokuda, Colleagues Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Revitalize Rural Hospitals Washington, D.C. — Today, Representative Jill N. Tokuda (HI-02), along with her colleagues Reps. Jack Bergman (MI-01), Shomari Figures (AL-02), Carol Miller (WV-01), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), Tracey Mann (KS-01), Sharice D…

May 22, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; bipartisanship; credit claiming; Health; extreme label “extreme” aimed at Medicaid cuts · Source

Examples by category

Up to five recent statements in each category

Category

Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

  1. Posts on X

    The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.

    personal attacks · policy discussion · Agriculture and Food · Energy · Health · Government Operations and Politics · target: Donald TrumpSource

  2. Posts on X

    The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.

    personal attacks · target: Donald TrumpSource

  3. Posts on X

    The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.

    personal attacks · policy discussion · Armed Forces and National Security · Government Operations and Politics · Law · target: Pete HegsethSource

  4. Posts on X

    The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.

    personal attacks · policy discussion · Armed Forces and National Security · target: unknownSource

  5. Congressional Record

    Mr. Speaker, today marks the anniversary of Citizens United. This decision did not rewrite campaign finance law; it sold our democracy to the highest bidder. Before Citizens United, elections were about persuading voters. After it, they became about courting billionaires. As of 2025, there are 2,502 super-PACs. For the 2024 election, they have taken in over $5 billion, much of it dark money, much of it undisclosed, a…

    personal attacks · policy criticism · policy discussion · bipartisanship · Government Operations and Politics · Housing and Community Development · Law · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · Taxation · Health · FamiliesSource

All 717 statements

Newest first, the 119th Congress

The full feed

Five statements at a time, newest first; filters apply to the statements loaded so far. Export saves the statements that match. Sources: 487 posts on X, 126 press releases, 89 Congressional Record speeches, 15 newsletters.

Back to topNext: Policy

Policy

Health is what Tokuda talks about most: 25% of policy statements. Talk and legislation agree at 0.69 on a 0–1 scale (House Democrats average 0.67; 83rd of 216).

Each policy statement is tagged by the AI model with one or more of 25 policy areas from the Congressional Research Service list, so the shares say what Tokuda talks about. The bills Tokuda sponsors and cosponsors carry the same areas, so the two can be compared.

What Tokuda talks about

Share of policy statements by area, the 119th Congress

0%35%
Tokuda
Peers
Health130 statements
25%
26%
Agriculture and Food116 statements
22%
9%
Armed Forces and National Security107 statements
21%
16%
Government Operations and Politics92 statements
18%
20%
Emergency Management87 statements
17%
5%
Show the data
Policy areas Tokuda talks about, as a share of policy statements, against the House Democrats average.
RowTokudaPeers
Health25%26%
Agriculture and Food22%9%
Armed Forces and National Security21%16%
Government Operations and Politics18%20%
Emergency Management17%5%
How to read the bars

The thick bar is the share of Tokuda’s policy statements in an area; the thin grey bar is the average share for House Democrats. A statement counts once in each of its areas, so shares can add to more than 100%. The five largest areas are shown; the toggle shows the rest.

Talks about · legislates on

Left: share of statements by policy area. Right: share of bills. Areas in order of their share of statements; both sides run from 0 to 35%. Grey ticks are the House Democrats averages.

Talks aboutLegislates onHealthHealth, talks about: 25% (House Democrats 26%)25%Health, legislates on: 18% (House Democrats 16%)18%Agriculture and FoodAgriculture and Food, talks about: 22% (House Democrats 9%)22%Agriculture and Food, legislates on: 12% (House Democrats 4%)12%Armed Forces and NationalSecurityArmed Forces and National Security, talks about: 21% (House Democrats 16%)21%Armed Forces and National Security, legislates on: 8% (House Democrats 7%)8%Government Operations andPoliticsGovernment Operations and Politics, talks about: 18% (House Democrats 20%)18%Government Operations and Politics, legislates on: 8% (House Democrats 11%)8%Emergency ManagementEmergency Management, talks about: 17% (House Democrats 5%)17%Emergency Management, legislates on: 1% (House Democrats 1%)1%
Show the data
Tokuda's share of statements against share of bills in each policy area.
AreaTalks aboutHouse Democrats, talks aboutLegislates onHouse Democrats, legislates on
Health25%26%18%16%
Agriculture and Food22%9%12%4%
Armed Forces and National Security21%16%8%7%
Government Operations and Politics18%20%8%11%
Emergency Management17%5%1%1%
0.69

talk-to-bills agreement, 0 to 1

House Democrats average 0.67. Ranks 83rd of 216.

What agreement means, and what it doesn’t

Agreement is 1 minus the distance between the two distributions (Jensen–Shannon): 1 means Tokuda legislates on exactly the areas Tokuda talks about, in the same proportions; 0 means no overlap. It does not say whether the bills match the positions in the statements, only the subjects. Bills Tokuda sponsored count fully, cosponsored bills a quarter. Shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.

Back to topNext: Ideology

Ideology

Tokuda sits at −1.14 on the CSIP scale, left of 0, more liberal than 71% of House Democrats. Approximate range −1.17 to −1.10, which understates the uncertainty; from 1,114 donors and 1,894 roll calls.

CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official, federal and state, on one left–right scale, estimated from roll-call votes, who gives money to whom, and the text of statements. Negative is left of 0, positive right of it; 0 is the centre of the scale, not a definition of “moderate”.

−1.14

CSIP ideal point

Approximate range −1.17 to −1.10. From 1,114 donors and 1,894 roll calls. Run 2026-10-25T215945. Blue is left of 0, red right of 0.

← More liberalMore conservative →0Tokuda −1.1House Democrats −1.0All House +0.3

The outlined dot is Tokuda, coloured by its side of 0 (blue left, red right, deeper further out); the bar through it is the approximate range (±1.96 standard errors), which understates the uncertainty; the grey ticks below are the medians of Tokuda’s groups. 0 is the centre of the scale, not “moderate” by definition.

What this means, and what it doesn’t

The score summarises how an official votes, who funds them and how they talk, relative to everyone else. It does not grade positions as good or bad, and two officials with the same score can differ on any single issue. The ± range is 1.96 standard errors, which understates the uncertainty: scores whose ranges overlap may not differ at all, and even scores whose ranges do not overlap may not differ.

Where Tokuda sits

Every official in each group, on the CSIP scale

−2.0−1.00.0+1.0+2.0← More liberalMore conservative →House Democratsmedian −1.0Tokuda −1.1All Housemedian +0.3
Show the data
Tokuda's CSIP score of −1.14 placed against House Democrats, All House.
GroupOfficialsMedianShare left of Tokuda
House Democrats217−1.029%
All House439+0.314%
How to read the strips

Every small dot is one official on the same scale, coloured by its own score (blue left of 0, red right of 0, grey at 0, deeper further out) and spread up and down only to keep dots apart; where a group is crowded the dots overlap, and darker patches mean more officials. The large outlined dot is Tokuda in every row; the rule is each group’s median. The table under the figure gives the share of each group to the left of Tokuda.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Tokuda raised $985.9K in the 2026 cycle, below the House Democrats’ median of $2.0M. 13% of individual money came in gifts of $200 or less. 70% of itemized individual money came from Hawaii.

Campaign money from Federal Election Commission filings, as aggregates only; the lab never shows an individual donor. Campaigns must report by name every person who gives them more than $200 in a cycle (“itemized”); smaller gifts are reported only as one total (“unitemized”), so donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations describe itemized donors only.

Election cycle
$985.9K

raised in the 2026 cycle

From 512 itemized donors. House Democrats’ median $2.0M.

Where the money came from

Each square is one percent of 2026-cycle receipts, from FEC summary totals.

Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Itemized individual (over $200): $641.9K (65.1%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less): $92.1K (9.3%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)PACs and other committees: $244.3K (24.8%)Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds): $7,619 (0.8%)
  • Itemized individual (over $200)65 squares$641.9K
  • Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less)9 squares$92.1K
  • PACs and other committees25 squares$244.3K
  • Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds)1 squares$7,619
Show the data
Sources of Tokuda's money, 2026 cycle, one square per percent
SourceAmountShare
Itemized individual (over $200)$641.9K65.1%
Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less)$92.1K9.3%
PACs and other committees$244.3K24.8%
Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds)$7,6190.8%
What this means, and what it doesn’t

Totals say how much a campaign took in, not how it was spent, and they rise sharply when a seat is up for election; compare cycles with that in mind. The small-donor share understates small giving when a campaign itemizes gifts made through ActBlue or WinRed.

Receipts by cycle

Total receipts, 2022 to 2026. The grey line is the House Democrats’ median for 2026.

2022 cycle: $1.0M$1.0M20222024 cycle: $989.5K$989.5K20242026 cycle: $985.9K$985.9K2026House Democrats median $2.0M
Show the data
Tokuda's receipts by cycle against the 2026 House Democrats median.
ItemValue
2022 cycle$1.0M
2024 cycle$989.5K
2026 cycle$985.9K

Top donor states, 2026

Itemized contributions by donor state. 70% came from Hawaii.

  1. Hawaii$378.3K
  2. California$63.9K
  3. Virginia$22.0K
  4. District of Columbia$18.6K
  5. Kentucky$7,000

Small donations

Gifts of $200 or less as a share of individual money, by cycle. The thin grey bar is the 2026 House Democrats’ median.

0%60%
Tokuda
Median
2026
13%
13%
2024
10%
13%
2022
10%
13%
Show the data
Small-donor share by cycle against the House Democrats median
RowTokudaMedian
2026 cycle13%13%
2024 cycle10%13%
2022 cycle10%13%

Where itemized donors live

Individuals who gave more than $200, by donor state

Alaska: no dataAKMaine: no dataMEVermont: $1,000VTNew Hampshire: no dataNHWashington: $5,225WAIdaho: no dataIDMontana: no dataMTNorth Dakota: no dataNDMinnesota: no dataMNIllinois: $500ILWisconsin: $250WIMichigan: no dataMINew York: $5,300NYRhode Island: no dataRIMassachusetts: $7,000MAOregon: $1,250ORNevada: $6,000NVWyoming: no dataWYSouth Dakota: no dataSDIowa: no dataIAIndiana: no dataINOhio: no dataOHPennsylvania: no dataPANew Jersey: no dataNJConnecticut: no dataCTCalifornia: $63.9KCAUtah: no dataUTColorado: $2,500CONebraska: no dataNEMissouri: no dataMOKentucky: $7,000KYWest Virginia: no dataWVVirginia: $22.0KVAMaryland: $6,250MDDelaware: no dataDEArizona: $500AZNew Mexico: $500NMKansas: no dataKSArkansas: no dataARTennessee: no dataTNNorth Carolina: $1,000NCSouth Carolina: $1,000SCDistrict of Columbia: $18.6KDCOklahoma: $1,000OKLouisiana: $1,000LAMississippi: no dataMSAlabama: no dataALGeorgia: no dataGAHawaii: $378.3KHITexas: $6,250TXFlorida: $500FL
Show the data
Tokuda's itemized individual contributions by donor state, 2026 cycle
StateValue
Hawaii$378.3K
California$63.9K
Virginia$22.0K
District of Columbia$18.6K
Massachusetts$7,000
Kentucky$7,000
Maryland$6,250
Texas$6,250
Nevada$6,000
New York$5,300
Washington$5,225
Colorado$2,500
Oregon$1,250
Vermont$1,000
North Carolina$1,000
South Carolina$1,000
Oklahoma$1,000
Louisiana$1,000
Illinois$500
Arizona$500
New Mexico$500
Florida$500
Wisconsin$250
AlaskaNo data
MaineNo data
New HampshireNo data
IdahoNo data
MontanaNo data
North DakotaNo data
MinnesotaNo data
MichiganNo data
Rhode IslandNo data
WyomingNo data
South DakotaNo data
IowaNo data
IndianaNo data
OhioNo data
PennsylvaniaNo data
New JerseyNo data
ConnecticutNo data
UtahNo data
NebraskaNo data
MissouriNo data
West VirginiaNo data
DelawareNo data
KansasNo data
ArkansasNo data
TennesseeNo data
MississippiNo data
AlabamaNo data
GeorgiaNo data
512

itemized donors

People who gave more than $200

70%

from Hawaii

Of itemized individual dollars

How to read the map

Every state the same size. Darker states gave more itemized money; hatched states had no itemized donors; the outlined state is Hawaii. Gifts of $200 or less carry no address and are left out.

Donors’ ideology

Distribution of itemized donors’ own CSIP scores

CSIP −1.50 to −1.25: 7.0%CSIP −1.25 to −1.00: 70%70%CSIP −1.00 to −0.75: 17%CSIP −0.75 to −0.50: 1.8%CSIP −0.50 to −0.25: 1.4%CSIP −0.25 to 0.00: 1.8%CSIP 0.00 to +0.25: 0.6%CSIP +0.25 to +0.50: 0.2%CSIP +0.50 to +0.75: 0.2%CSIP +1.00 to +1.25: 0.2%← More liberalMore conservative →0
Show the data
Ideology of Tokuda's itemized donors in 2026, from −1.50 to +1.25: 7.0% between −1.50 and −1.25, 70% between −1.25 and −1.00, 17% between −1.00 and −0.75.
ItemValue
CSIP −1.50 to −1.257.0%
CSIP −1.25 to −1.0070%
CSIP −1.00 to −0.7517%
CSIP −0.75 to −0.501.8%
CSIP −0.50 to −0.251.4%
CSIP −0.25 to 0.001.8%
CSIP 0.00 to +0.250.6%
CSIP +0.25 to +0.500.2%
CSIP +0.50 to +0.750.2%
CSIP +1.00 to +1.250.2%
How to read the columns

Donors who give to many candidates get their own CSIP score. Each column is the share of Tokuda’s itemized money from donors in that part of the scale, blue left of 0 and red right of 0, deeper further out; Tokuda’s own score is −1.14.

Top donor occupations

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

  1. NOT EMPLOYED$121.3K 151 donors
  2. ATTORNEY$36.6K 44 donors
  3. RETIRED$36.0K 33 donors
  4. CEO$32.0K 19 donors
  5. PRESIDENT$31.4K 25 donors

Top committees

PAC and committee contributions, 2026 cycle.

  1. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E$10.0K
  2. HAWAII PAC$10.0K
  3. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10.0K
  4. PINEAPPLE PAC$10.0K
  5. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC)$7,500

Top employers

Itemized, 2026 cycle.

  1. EO SOLUTIONS$19.0K 3 donors
  2. MATSON$9,400 9 donors
  3. UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII$7,600 7 donors
  4. HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES$5,250 12 donors
  5. MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY$4,500 4 donors

Aggregates only. Individual donors are never named.

Back to topNext: Votes

Votes

Tokuda voted with the majority of House Democrats on 99.7% of party-line votes and missed 0.1% of 674 roll calls. House Democrats on average: 96.4% party unity, 96.9% attendance. Across all roll calls, Tokuda voted against the majority of House Democrats 8 times.

674 roll calls Tokuda could vote on in the 119th Congress, compared with House Democrats. Attendance is the share with a vote recorded. Party unity counts only party-line roll calls, where most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides, and is the share of those where Tokuda voted with the majority of House Democrats. The count of votes against that majority covers every roll call where the majority took a side.

8

votes against the majority of House Democrats

Party unity 99.7%, House Democrats average 96.4%, ranks 19th of 217. 674 roll calls in the 119th Congress.

Attendance and party unity

The thick bar is Tokuda, the thin grey bar the House Democrats average. The scale runs from 80% to 100% to show the gap.

80%100%
Tokuda
Peers
Rank
Attendance
99.8%
96.9%
23rd of 217
Party unity
99.7%
96.4%
19th of 217
Show the data
Tokuda's attendance and party unity against House Democrats.
RowTokudaPeers
Attendance99.8%96.9%
Party unity99.7%96.4%
What this means, and what it doesn’t

A missed roll call has many causes, from illness to campaigning, so attendance says how often, not why. A vote against the majority can be on procedure as well as substance, and many fall on roll calls where both parties split; the key votes below show the ones that decided something.

Key votes

25 roll calls the lab flagged as key in the 119th Congress

Key votes
Party split (yea–nay)Why it’s key
Sep 16, 2026
S. 2403
Retire through Ownership Act
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
YeaWith majorityPassedD 209–0 · R 191–14 · I 1–0Democrats 209 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 191 yea, 14 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 naybecame law
Sep 16, 2026
H.J.Res. 213
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the “California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision”
On Passage
NayWith majorityPassedD 3–207 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 3 yea, 207 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nayclose vote
Sep 16, 2026
H.R. 10326
PROOF Act
On Passage
NayWith majorityPassedD 6–206 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 6 yea, 206 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nayclose vote
Sep 16, 2026
H.R. 9576
National Fraud Enforcement Division Act
On Passage
NayAgainst majorityPassedD 139–72 · R 212–0 · I 1–0Democrats 139 yea, 72 nay; Republicans 212 yea, 0 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nayparty crossover
Sep 16, 2026
H.R. 5334
An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments
YeaAgainst majorityPassedD 58–152 · R 203–7 · I 1–0Democrats 58 yea, 152 nay; Republicans 203 yea, 7 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 naybecame law · party crossover
How key votes are chosen

Automatically: a final-passage or override vote where the measure became law, the margin was under 10%, at least 10% of either party voted against its majority, or the bill was among the 25 most mentioned in officials’ own statements. Up to 25 per window, most recent first; five are shown. Bars show yea on the left, nay on the right, per party.

Votes most often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Tokuda most often

  1. Glenn IveyD661 shared votes99%
  2. Danny DavisD644 shared votes99%
  3. Alma AdamsD672 shared votes99%
  4. Judy ChuD670 shared votes99%
  5. Bobby ScottD668 shared votes99%

Votes least often with

The colleagues who voted the same way as Tokuda least often

  1. Chip RoyR633 shared votes15%
  2. Ralph NormanR596 shared votes17%
  3. Eric BurlisonR641 shared votes17%
  4. Andy BiggsR607 shared votes17%
  5. Keith SelfR658 shared votes17%
How to read the agreement lists

The share of roll calls both members voted on where they voted the same way, among colleagues sharing at least 50 such votes. High agreement with members of the other party is common on routine votes.

Full voting record

119th Congress (2025–27), loads in batches

Back to topNext: Legislation

Legislation

Tokuda sponsored 43 bills in the 119th Congress; none became law. Cosponsored 696 others. 2.3% of sponsored bills got out of committee (House Democrats average 4.9%; 122nd of 207).

The bills Tokuda sponsored and cosponsored in the 119th Congress, from the official bill records, and how far each got: introduced, referred to or acted on in committee, passed one chamber, passed both, became law. A bill counts at every stage it has reached, so the blocks only shrink to the right.

Bills by stage

Counts for the 119th Congress

Sponsored43 billsSponsored, Introduced: 4343Sponsored, In committee: 4343Sponsored, Passed one chamber: 11Sponsored, Passed both chambers: 00Sponsored, Became law: 00Cosponsored696 billsCosponsored, Introduced: 696696Cosponsored, In committee: 696696Cosponsored, Passed one chamber: 1919Cosponsored, Passed both chambers: 33Cosponsored, Became law: 22IntroducedIncommitteePassed onechamberPassed bothchambersBecamelaw
Show the data
Bills Tokuda sponsored and cosponsored, by furthest stage reached
RoleIntroducedIn committeePassed one chamberPassed both chambersBecame law
Sponsored4343100
Cosponsored6966961932
How to read the blocks

Ink blocks are bills Tokuda sponsored, ochre blocks bills Tokuda cosponsored; the figure above each block is the count. Most bills in any legislature never leave committee, so a short staircase is the norm.

2.3%

of sponsored bills got out of committee

House Democrats average 4.9%. Ranks 122nd of 207.

Cosponsorship partners

Colleagues who most often cosponsor with Tokuda, by number of shared bills in the 119th Congress; the square shows their party.

  1. Eleanor Norton98
  2. Ed Case77
  3. Rashida Tlaib43
  4. André Carson41
  5. Hank Johnson Jr.38
What this means, and what it doesn’t

The score is the share of sponsored bills that a committee reported out or a chamber passed, with at least 5 sponsored bills, ranked within the peer group. Members of the majority party and committee chairs move more bills, so the rank reflects position in the chamber as well as effort. Cosponsorship partners are the five colleagues who share the most of Tokuda’s bills; the toggle shows more.

Bill list

Sponsored and cosponsored, with status and policy area; five are shown, the toggle shows the rest

Bills sponsored and cosponsored
H.Res. 1635Supporting the designation of October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".CosponsorOct 22, 2026In committeeUnassignedReferred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. Oct 22, 2026
H.R. 10774SWIMS Act of 2026CosponsorOct 9, 2026In committeeEnvironmental ProtectionReferred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Oct 9, 2026
H.R. 10642STS ActCosponsorOct 1, 2026In committeeInternational AffairsReferred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Financial Services, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Oct 1, 2026
H.Res. 1593Recognizing the month of October 2026 as Filipino American History Month and celebrating the history and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense contributions to the United States.CosponsorOct 1, 2026In committeeUnassignedReferred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Oct 1, 2026
H.Res. 1603Expressing concern about the growing problem of book banning and the proliferation of threats to freedom of expression in the United States.CosponsorOct 1, 2026In committeeUnassignedReferred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Oct 1, 2026

Back to topNext: Online

Online

A site that changed 55 times in 90 days. Tokuda’s official site had 30 pages when last crawled on Oct 25, 2026. The lab last catalogued the images Tokuda posted on Oct 18, 2026.

The lab crawls Tokuda’s official and campaign websites (weekly for Congress, monthly for the states) and keeps every page’s text, so changes can be read later; it also records social accounts and describes the images Tokuda posts with a vision model.

Websites

How to read the counts

“Pages crawled” is the size of the site at the last crawl; “changes in 90 days” counts pages whose text differed from the previous crawl. Sites change for many routine reasons, such as new press releases, so a high count is not by itself notable.

Images Tokuda posted

The latest 24, with model-written descriptions

  • A promotional graphic announcing that applications are open for military service academy nominations. It shows four academy emblems, their names and locations, application information, a deadline, and contact details against a blue background.
    A promotional graphic announcing that applications are open for military service academy nominations. It shows four academy emblems, their names and locations, application information, a deadline, and contact details against a blue background.View post
  • A smiling man and woman pose together at an indoor event beneath a projection screen. The man wears a patterned shirt and flower lei, and the woman wears a red-and-black patterned dress. Other people and event decorations are visible in the background, along with text on the screen.
    A smiling man and woman pose together at an indoor event beneath a projection screen. The man wears a patterned shirt and flower lei, and the woman wears a red-and-black patterned dress. Other people and event decorations are visible in the background, along with text on the screen.View post
  • Five adults pose together and smile at an outdoor event beneath a large canopy decorated with string lights. Tables and chairs are arranged around them, with other people in the background. A small amount of text is visible on a table sign.
    Five adults pose together and smile at an outdoor event beneath a large canopy decorated with string lights. Tables and chairs are arranged around them, with other people in the background. A small amount of text is visible on a table sign.View post
  • A group of people pose together at a festive dinner under a tent decorated with string lights. Several are wearing floral shirts and flower garlands, with dining tables and chairs around them. No prominent text is visible.
    A group of people pose together at a festive dinner under a tent decorated with string lights. Several are wearing floral shirts and flower garlands, with dining tables and chairs around them. No prominent text is visible.View post
  • A group of people stand together on a stage beneath string lights, appearing to sing or perform at an anniversary celebration. A projected slide is behind them, with flowers and a podium at the sides. Text appears on the slide.
    A group of people stand together on a stage beneath string lights, appearing to sing or perform at an anniversary celebration. A projected slide is behind them, with flowers and a podium at the sides. Text appears on the slide.View post
About the descriptions

Written by a vision model and may be wrong. Open the post to see the original. Five are shown; the toggle shows the rest.

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

How this page was made. Profile built Oct 28, 2026; site last built Oct 28, 2026. Every number on the page is computed from the sources listed here, by the same rules for every official; nothing is written by hand.

The headline

The headline is the measure on which Tokuda is most unusual among House Democrats, chosen by one rule for every official of every party. The candidates are the rate of each kind of statement and of extreme labels, party unity, attendance, the small-donor share, the in-state share and total receipts of the latest cycle, the share of sponsored bills that got out of committee, talk-to-bills agreement, and the CSIP score’s place within the party group.

The builder ranks every measure within the same peer group the page compares it with, and writes each official’s percentile: the share of the group below the value, ties counting half, so 0.5 is the median and a value shared by many never ranks first. A measure’s score is how far that percentile sits from the median (0 in the middle, 0.5 at either end), and the highest score leads if it is above 0.25, outside the middle half of the group. Scores within 0.03 of each other are a tie, broken in this order: votes against the party majority, kinds of statement, ideology, roll calls missed, small donations, in-state money, legislation, agreement, extreme labels, receipts.

A measure counts only with at least 200 statements, 100 roll calls or 5 sponsored bills behind it and a peer group of at least 10. Two things never lead: high party unity or attendance, where most members sit, and a high rate of a kind of statement backed by fewer than 10 statements. When nothing qualifies, the headline is a neutral fact instead: statements classified, or years in office. The wording always names the direction (“in the bottom 5% of …”, “votes against the majority of …”).

Identifiers

Profile id
T000487
Bioguide
T000487
FEC candidate ids
H2HI02581

Bulk files with the same data for every official:

Freshness of this profile’s data

  • What politicians sayOct 27, 20261 days agoMembers of Congress: tweets since 2017; press releases, newsletters and floor speeches since 2022. State legislators: tweets since May 2024. Governors: tweets since January 2025. Labels from an LLM classifier.
  • Roll calls (Congress)Sep 30, 202628 days agoVoteview roll calls, 113th Congress (2013) on.
  • Bills (Congress)Oct 22, 20266 days agoGovInfo BILLSTATUS: sponsors, cosponsors, actions, CRS policy area.
  • Campaign money (FEC)Oct 22, 20266 days agoFEC committee financial summaries (totals, small donations) and itemized contributions (donor counts, states, employers), cycles 2020-2026; aggregates only.
  • Ideology (CSIP)Oct 25, 20263 days agoCommon-Space Ideal Points (CSIP), current validated run.
  • WebsitesOct 25, 20263 days agoWeekly crawls of federal sites since April 2026; monthly state crawls since June 2026.
  • ImagesOct 28, 2026todayImages in members' tweets with vision-model descriptions.

How the measures work

What politicians say
Every post, press release, newsletter and congressional floor speech is read by a language model and marked for personal attacks, policy criticism, policy discussion, bipartisanship and credit claiming. A statement can be in several. Rates are shares of statements in the window. The methods paper.
Extreme labels
A statement has an extreme label when it calls a politician, party or policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who the label is aimed at.
Policy areas and agreement
Statements and bills share 25 Congressional Research Service policy areas (state bills are assigned by a language model). Agreement is 1 − Jensen–Shannon distance between the two distributions, shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
Ideology (CSIP)
Common-Space Ideal Points place federal and state officials on one left–right scale, estimated jointly from roll calls, campaign contributions and the text of statements, with standard errors. Only a validated run is shown. The methods paper.
Campaign money
Campaigns report by name only donors who give more than $200 in a cycle; smaller gifts are reported as one total. Federal totals and the small-donor share come from the FEC’s financial summaries of each campaign committee. Donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations cover itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift totals, so state figures are itemized only. The lab never publishes donor names.
Votes and key votes
Attendance, party unity and the count of votes against the majority of an official’s own party come from roll calls (Voteview for Congress, chamber records for the states). Key votes are final-passage or override votes that became law, were decided by under 10%, saw at least 10% of a party vote against its majority, or concerned one of the 25 bills most mentioned in officials’ statements.
Peers and ranks
Comparisons are with the same party, chamber and level (for example House Democrats); state legislators are compared within their state and chamber for votes. Every comparison names its group. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; tied values share the average of their ranks, and the percentile is the share of the group below the value, ties counting half.

America’s Political Pulse · Polarization Research Lab

Back to top