Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
no labelSource
2026 midterms · Candidate
Democrat · Candidate · Governor of Georgia · Challenger
KB
48
statements classified
Fewer than 50, too few to rank against other candidates; the rates are shown below.
An AI model reads each of Bottoms’s posts on X and marks five kinds of statement.
What Bottoms says
48 of Bottoms’s statements are classified. Fewer than 50, too few to rank against other candidates; the rates are shown below.
An AI model reads Bottoms’s posts on X and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 34 Democratic candidates for governor with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Bottoms among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.
How often does Bottoms make each kind of statement?
Share of statements: Bottoms (thick bar) against the Democratic candidates for governor average (thin grey bar)
0%50%
Bottoms
Average
Rank
Personal attacks
0%
3.7%
33rd of 35
Policy criticism
8.3%
16%
30th of 35
Policy discussion
21%
48%
34th of 35
Bipartisanship
2.1%
3.7%
23rd of 35
Credit claiming
6.3%
19%
30th of 35
Show the data
| Row | Bottoms | Average |
|---|---|---|
| Personal attacks | 0% | 3.7% |
| Policy criticism | 8.3% | 16% |
| Policy discussion | 21% | 48% |
| Bipartisanship | 2.1% | 3.7% |
| Credit claiming | 6.3% | 19% |
48
statements classified
From their posts on X.
The five kinds of statement
Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.
Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.
Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).
Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.
Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.
Recent statements
Bottoms’s 20 latest statements on file, newest first. The latest is from Oct 22, 2026.
Each statement is shown as written, with the labels the AI model gave it (or none). Five are shown; the rest are one click away. The lab keeps the latest 20 per candidate here.
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
policy discussionSource
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
no labelSource
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
no labelSource
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
no labelSource
Money
Candidates for governor report to their state, not to the Federal Election Commission.
No campaign-finance figures are on file for candidates for governor.
Online
Bottoms’s posts on X from Mar 15, 2025 to Oct 22, 2026. Followers and the average likes and views per post, from the posts the lab has collected.
Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.
Followers
Not on file
Likes per post
451
Views per post
16.1K
The race
Georgia Governor: Bottoms advanced from the primary. Primary May 19, 2026, runoff Jun 16, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.
Rated toss-up. Cook Political Report ratings, entered by the lab (last updated by the lab on Jun 24, 2026); a forecaster’s judgement about the general election, not the lab’s.
Who else is on the list?
Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary
- Rick JacksonRChallenger · advanced
The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in Georgia
Methods and sources
The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.
The statements. This candidate is measured on the posts on X the lab collects for the campaign. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.
The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.
Identifiers. The lab’s governor id GA-keisha-bottoms.
Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected, the latest from Oct 22, 2026.