Skip to content

2026 midterms · Candidate

Democrat · Candidate · U.S. Senate, New Mexico · Incumbent

Portrait of Ben Lujan, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
17%
of statements criticize a policy

In the bottom tenth of Democratic Senate incumbents (their average is 21%; Lujan ranks 19th of 20, where 1st is the highest rate), from 13,054 statements.

An AI model reads everything Lujan publishes in office (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) and marks whether each criticizes a specific policy, law or ruling; the rate is the share marked.

What Lujan says

17% of Lujan’s statements criticize a policy, in the bottom tenth of Democratic Senate incumbents. Their average is 21%.

An AI model reads everything Lujan publishes in office and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 20 Democratic Senate incumbents with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Lujan among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How often does Lujan make each kind of statement?

Share of statements: Lujan (thick bar) against the Democratic Senate incumbents average (thin grey bar)

0%70%
Lujan
Average
Rank
Personal attacks
3.4%
3.7%
7th of 20
Policy criticism
17%
21%
19th of 20
Policy discussion
70%
69%
12th of 20
Bipartisanship
6.9%
11%
14th of 20
Credit claiming
23%
20%
8th of 20
Show the data
Lujan’s share of statements of each kind, against the Democratic Senate incumbents average: Personal attacks 3.4%, Policy criticism 17%, Policy discussion 70%, Bipartisanship 6.9%, Credit claiming 23%.
RowLujanAverage
Personal attacks3.4%3.7%
Policy criticism17%21%
Policy discussion70%69%
Bipartisanship6.9%11%
Credit claiming23%20%
13,054

statements classified

From everything they publish in office: posts, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches.

This compares Lujan with other candidates. Lujan’s official profile compares Lujan with fellow office-holders and has every statement, vote and bill.

The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Lujan reports $6.5M raised and $2.8M cash on hand. No other candidate on this race’s list has FEC figures to compare.

Totals the campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle, as filed.

Raised

$6.5M

Spent

$4.8M

Cash on hand

$2.8M

Where has Lujan’s money come from?

Receipts by source, as reported to the FEC

Individuals: $3.4M (61.9%)Individuals $3.4MPACs: $2.1M (38.1%)PACs $2.1M
Show the data
Lujan’s receipts by source: Individuals $3.4M, PACs $2.1M, Party committees $0, Own money $0, Candidate loans $0.
PartValue
Individuals$3.4M
PACs$2.1M
Party committees$0
Own money$0
Candidate loans$0
Notes
Sources are the FEC’s categories; what is left (transfers, refunds, other receipts) is not drawn. The race page compares every candidate in the race.

Back to topNext: Online

Online

Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.

No engagement figures are on file for this account.

Back to topNext: The race

The race

New Mexico Senate: Lujan advanced from the primary. Primary Jun 2, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.

This race is not among the races the lab lists as rated toss-up or leaning.

Who else is on the list?

Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary

No other candidate is listed for this race.

The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in New Mexico

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.

The statements. As an incumbent member of Congress, this candidate is measured on everything the lab collects from them in office: posts on X, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.

The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Identifiers. FEC candidate id S0NM00058 (FEC record). Bioguide id L000570. First FEC filing Apr 1, 2019.

Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected.

About the data →

Back to top