Skip to content

2026 midterms · Candidate

Democrat · Candidate · U.S. Senate, New Jersey · Incumbent

Portrait of Cory Booker, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
62%
of statements discuss policy

In the bottom quarter of Democratic Senate incumbents (their average is 70%; Booker ranks 18th of 20, where 1st is the highest rate), from 20,062 statements.

An AI model reads everything Booker publishes in office (posts, press releases, newsletters, floor speeches) and marks whether each discusses a specific policy; the rate is the share marked.

What Booker says

62% of Booker’s statements discuss policy, in the bottom quarter of Democratic Senate incumbents. Their average is 70%.

An AI model reads everything Booker publishes in office and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 20 Democratic Senate incumbents with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Booker among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How often does Booker make each kind of statement?

Share of statements: Booker (thick bar) against the Democratic Senate incumbents average (thin grey bar)

0%70%
Booker
Average
Rank
Personal attacks
2.5%
3.7%
13th of 20
Policy criticism
20%
21%
10th of 20
Policy discussion
62%
70%
18th of 20
Bipartisanship
5.9%
11%
16th of 20
Credit claiming
12%
21%
18th of 20
Show the data
Booker’s share of statements of each kind, against the Democratic Senate incumbents average: Personal attacks 2.5%, Policy criticism 20%, Policy discussion 62%, Bipartisanship 5.9%, Credit claiming 12%.
RowBookerAverage
Personal attacks2.5%3.7%
Policy criticism20%21%
Policy discussion62%70%
Bipartisanship5.9%11%
Credit claiming12%21%
20,062

statements classified

From everything they publish in office: posts, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches.

This compares Booker with other candidates. Booker’s official profile compares Booker with fellow office-holders and has every statement, vote and bill.

The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Booker reports $21.3M raised and $22.9M cash on hand. By money raised, 1st of the two candidates on this race’s list with FEC figures.

Totals the campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle, as filed.

Raised

$21.3M

Spent

$9.6M

Cash on hand

$22.9M

Where has Booker’s money come from?

Receipts by source, as reported to the FEC

Individuals: $15.7M (96.8%)Individuals $15.7MPACs: $512.8K (3.2%)
Show the data
Booker’s receipts by source: Individuals $15.7M, PACs $512.8K, Party committees $0, Own money $0, Candidate loans $0.
PartValue
Individuals$15.7M
PACs$512.8K
Party committees$0
Own money$0
Candidate loans$0
Notes
Sources are the FEC’s categories; what is left (transfers, refunds, other receipts) is not drawn. The race page compares every candidate in the race.

Back to topNext: Online

Online

Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.

No engagement figures are on file for this account.

Back to topNext: The race

The race

New Jersey Senate: Booker advanced from the primary. Primary Jun 2, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.

This race is not among the races the lab lists as rated toss-up or leaning.

Who else is on the list?

Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary

The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in New Jersey

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.

The statements. As an incumbent member of Congress, this candidate is measured on everything the lab collects from them in office: posts on X, press releases, newsletters and floor speeches. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.

The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Identifiers. FEC candidate id S4NJ00185 (FEC record). Bioguide id B001288. First FEC filing May 13, 2013.

Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected.

About the data →

Back to top