2026 midterms · Alabama
Alabama 4th District
U.S. House · primary Jun 2, 2026 · runoff Jul 14, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026
- candidates
- 2
- Democrats
- 1
- Republicans
- 1
candidates advanced
Amanda Pusczek (D) and Robert Aderholt (R) advanced from the primary held on Jun 2, 2026 (runoff Jul 14, 2026). The general election is on Nov 3, 2026.
The candidates
Two candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. One incumbent and one challenger.
Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.
Democrats
Challenger · advanced from the primary · no statements on file · $22.3K raised
Republicans
Incumbent · advanced from the primary · 3,306 statements classified · $1.2M raised · official profile
Notes
House districts follow the candidates’ FEC filings; where a state redrew its map for 2026, a candidate may appear under their old district. A sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.
What they say
Only Robert Aderholt has enough classified statements to measure. The other one candidate has fewer than 10.
An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.
How do the candidates’ statements compare?
Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked House candidates
Personal attacks
Median 2.5% · axis 0–60%
- Aderholt R1.1%
Policy criticism
Median 15% · axis 0–60%
- Aderholt R14%
Policy discussion
Median 58% · axis 0–60%
- Aderholt R58%
Bipartisanship
Median 3.8% · axis 0–60%
- Aderholt R4.2%
Credit claiming
Median 16% · axis 0–60%
- Aderholt R20%
Show the data
| Candidate | Party | Statements | Personal attacks | Policy criticism | Policy discussion | Bipartisanship | Credit claiming |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Aderholt | R | 3,306 | 1.1% | 14% | 58% | 4.2% | 20% |
| Median, ranked House candidates | 2.5% | 15% | 58% | 3.8% | 16% |
The five kinds of statement
Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.
Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.
Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).
Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.
Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.
Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked House candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.
Money
Reported receipts range from $22.3K to $1.2M. Both candidates have campaign-finance figures from the FEC.
Totals each campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle: money raised, money spent and cash on hand at the end of the latest filing.
How much has each candidate raised?
Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand
- Robert Aderholt$1.2M$719.7K on hand
- Amanda Pusczek$22.3K$2,371 on hand
Show the data
| Candidate | Party | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand | Debts | Individuals | PACs | Party committees | Own money | Candidate loans | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Aderholt | R | $1.2M | $1.5M | $719.7K | $0 | $625.4K | $465.5K | $610 | $0 | $0 | — |
| Amanda Pusczek | D | $22.3K | $19.3K | $2,371 | $12.0K | $22.2K | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — |