Skip to content

2026 midterms · Arizona

Arizona Senate

U.S. Senate · primary Aug 4, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026

candidates
2
Democrats
2
Republicans
0
0

Senate seats up in Arizona in 2026

Neither of Arizona’s Senate seats is on the 2026 ballot. The tracker lists this race because candidates have filed with the FEC for a later Senate election, and it adds the sitting senators to it.

The candidates

Two candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. Two incumbents.

Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.

Not a 2026 race as listed.Neither of Arizona’s Senate seats is on the 2026 ballot. The tracker lists this race because candidates have filed with the FEC for a later Senate election, and it adds the sitting senators to it.

Democrats

Republicans

No candidate recorded as advancing.

Notes

Back to topNext: What they say

What they say

The candidates’ statements differ most on credit claiming: from 11% to 29%. Both candidates have 10 or more classified statements.

An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How do the candidates’ statements compare?

Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked Senate candidates

Show the data
Share of each candidate’s statements of each kind, with the median of ranked Senate candidates: Ruben Gallego, personal attacks 8.4%, policy criticism 17%, policy discussion 57%, bipartisanship 4.0%, credit claiming 11%; Mark Kelly, personal attacks 2.8%, policy criticism 18%, policy discussion 72%, bipartisanship 16%, credit claiming 29%.
CandidatePartyStatementsPersonal attacksPolicy criticismPolicy discussionBipartisanshipCredit claiming
Ruben GallegoD19,0268.4%17%57%4.0%11%
Mark KellyD8,0062.8%18%72%16%29%
Median, ranked Senate candidates3.1%18%61%5.3%15%
The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked Senate candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Totals each campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle: money raised, money spent and cash on hand at the end of the latest filing.

How much has each candidate raised?

Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand

No campaign-finance figures are on file for this race’s candidates.

Notes
Individuals, PACs, party committees, a candidate’s own money and loans are split out in the table. Figures are as filed and are not adjusted.

Back to top