Skip to content

2026 midterms · Iowa

Iowa 3rd District

U.S. House · primary Jun 2, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026 · rated toss-up

candidates
2
Democrats
1
Republicans
1
2

candidates advanced

Sarah Trone Garriott (D) and Zach Nunn (R) advanced from the primary held on Jun 2, 2026. The general election is on Nov 3, 2026.

The candidates

Two candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. One incumbent and one challenger.

Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.

Democrats

  • Sarah Trone GarriottD

    Challenger · advanced from the primary · 342 statements classified · $8.1M raised

Republicans

Notes

Rated toss-up. Cook Political Report ratings, entered by the lab (last updated by the lab on Jun 24, 2026); a forecaster’s judgement about the general election, not the lab’s.

House districts follow the candidates’ FEC filings; where a state redrew its map for 2026, a candidate may appear under their old district. A sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Back to topNext: What they say

What they say

The candidates’ statements differ most on credit claiming: from 6.4% to 50%. Both candidates have 10 or more classified statements.

An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How do the candidates’ statements compare?

Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked House candidates

Show the data
Share of each candidate’s statements of each kind, with the median of ranked House candidates: Sarah Trone Garriott, personal attacks 4.1%, policy criticism 28%, policy discussion 55%, bipartisanship 2.1%, credit claiming 6.4%; Zach Nunn, personal attacks 0.3%, policy criticism 12%, policy discussion 72%, bipartisanship 19%, credit claiming 50%.
CandidatePartyStatementsPersonal attacksPolicy criticismPolicy discussionBipartisanshipCredit claiming
Sarah Trone GarriottD3424.1%28%55%2.1%6.4%
Zach NunnR5,7670.3%12%72%19%50%
Median, ranked House candidates2.5%15%58%3.8%16%
The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked House candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Reported receipts range from $6.1M to $8.1M. Both candidates have campaign-finance figures from the FEC.

Totals each campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle: money raised, money spent and cash on hand at the end of the latest filing.

How much has each candidate raised?

Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand

  1. Sarah Trone Garriott$8.1M$1.2M on hand
  2. Zach Nunn$6.1M$620.8K on hand
Show the data
Money raised by the candidates in Iowa 3rd District
CandidatePartyRaisedSpentCash on handDebtsIndividualsPACsParty committeesOwn moneyCandidate loansThrough
Sarah Trone GarriottD$8.1M$6.9M$1.2M$0$7.2M$638.2K$19.3K$120$0—
Zach NunnR$6.1M$5.6M$620.8K$0$1.4M$2.2M$10.0K$0$0—
Notes
Individuals, PACs, party committees, a candidate’s own money and loans are split out in the table. Figures are as filed and are not adjusted.

Back to top