Skip to content

2026 midterms · Illinois

Illinois 9th District

U.S. House · primary Mar 17, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026

candidates
2
Democrats
1
Republicans
1
2

candidates advanced

Daniel Biss (D) and John Elleson (R) advanced from the primary held on Mar 17, 2026. The general election is on Nov 3, 2026.

The candidates

Two candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. Two running for an open seat. Janice Schakowsky (D), who holds the seat now, is not on the list of those advancing.

Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.

Democrats

  • Daniel BissD

    Open seat · advanced from the primary · 388 statements classified · $3.4M raised

Republicans

  • John EllesonR

    Open seat · advanced from the primary · 73 statements classified · $0 raised

Holds the seat now: Janice Schakowsky (D), not among the candidates recorded as advancing.

Notes

House districts follow the candidates’ FEC filings; where a state redrew its map for 2026, a candidate may appear under their old district. A sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Back to topNext: What they say

What they say

The candidates’ statements differ most on policy criticism: from 2.7% to 18%. Both candidates have 10 or more classified statements.

An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How do the candidates’ statements compare?

Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked House candidates

Show the data
Share of each candidate’s statements of each kind, with the median of ranked House candidates: Daniel Biss, personal attacks 4.1%, policy criticism 18%, policy discussion 41%, bipartisanship 0.8%, credit claiming 13%; John Elleson, personal attacks 8.2%, policy criticism 2.7%, policy discussion 34%, bipartisanship 0%, credit claiming 5.5%.
CandidatePartyStatementsPersonal attacksPolicy criticismPolicy discussionBipartisanshipCredit claiming
Daniel BissD3884.1%18%41%0.8%13%
John EllesonR738.2%2.7%34%0%5.5%
Median, ranked House candidates2.5%15%58%3.8%16%
The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked House candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Reported receipts range from $0 to $3.4M. Both candidates have campaign-finance figures from the FEC.

Totals each campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle: money raised, money spent and cash on hand at the end of the latest filing.

How much has each candidate raised?

Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand

  1. Daniel Biss$3.4M$608.9K on hand
  2. John Elleson$0$0 on hand
Show the data
Money raised by the candidates in Illinois 9th District
CandidatePartyRaisedSpentCash on handDebtsIndividualsPACsParty committeesOwn moneyCandidate loansThrough
Daniel BissD$3.4M$2.8M$608.9K$0$3.1M$307.1K$0$3,205$0—
John EllesonR$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0—
Notes
Individuals, PACs, party committees, a candidate’s own money and loans are split out in the table. Figures are as filed and are not adjusted.

Back to top