Skip to content

2026 midterms · Michigan

Michigan Senate

U.S. Senate · primary Aug 4, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026 · rated toss-up

candidates
2
Democrats
1
Republicans
1
2

candidates advanced

Abdul El-Sayed (D) and Michael Rogers (R) advanced from the primary held on Aug 4, 2026. The general election is on Nov 3, 2026.

The candidates

Two candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. Two running for an open seat. Gary Peters (D), who holds the seat now, is not on the list of those advancing.

Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.

Democrats

  • Abdul El-SayedD

    Open seat · advanced from the primary · 2,250 statements classified · $53.8M raised

Republicans

  • Michael RogersR

    Open seat · advanced from the primary · 1,052 statements classified · $23.0M raised

Holds the seat now: Gary Peters (D), not among the candidates recorded as advancing.

Notes

Rated toss-up. Cook Political Report ratings, entered by the lab (last updated by the lab on Jun 24, 2026); a forecaster’s judgement about the general election, not the lab’s.

Back to topNext: What they say

What they say

The candidates’ statements differ most on policy criticism: from 8.1% to 15%. Both candidates have 10 or more classified statements.

An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How do the candidates’ statements compare?

Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked Senate candidates

Show the data
Share of each candidate’s statements of each kind, with the median of ranked Senate candidates: Abdul El-Sayed, personal attacks 6.4%, policy criticism 15%, policy discussion 44%, bipartisanship 0.9%, credit claiming 6.7%; Michael Rogers, personal attacks 13%, policy criticism 8.1%, policy discussion 39%, bipartisanship 2.4%, credit claiming 10.0%.
CandidatePartyStatementsPersonal attacksPolicy criticismPolicy discussionBipartisanshipCredit claiming
Abdul El-SayedD2,2506.4%15%44%0.9%6.7%
Michael RogersR1,05213%8.1%39%2.4%10.0%
Median, ranked Senate candidates3.1%18%61%5.3%15%
The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked Senate candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Reported receipts range from $23.0M to $53.8M. Both candidates have campaign-finance figures from the FEC.

Totals each campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle: money raised, money spent and cash on hand at the end of the latest filing.

How much has each candidate raised?

Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand

  1. Abdul El-Sayed$53.8M$2.7M on hand
  2. Michael Rogers$23.0M$3.9M on hand
Show the data
Money raised by the candidates in Michigan Senate
CandidatePartyRaisedSpentCash on handDebtsIndividualsPACsParty committeesOwn moneyCandidate loansThrough
Abdul El-SayedD$53.8M$51.1M$2.7M$0$47.2M$404.7K$65.9K$0$0—
Michael RogersR$23.0M$19.4M$3.9M$0$15.4M$1.3M$62.0K$0$0—
Notes
Individuals, PACs, party committees, a candidate’s own money and loans are split out in the table. Figures are as filed and are not adjusted.

Back to top