2026 midterms · South Carolina
South Carolina 1st District
U.S. House · primary Jun 9, 2026 · runoff Jun 23, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026
- candidates
- 4
- Democrats
- 2
- Republicans
- 2
candidates advanced
William Deford (D), Nancy Lacore (D), Jenny Honeycutt (R) and Mark Smith (R) advanced from the primary held on Jun 9, 2026 (runoff Jun 23, 2026). The general election is on Nov 3, 2026.
The candidates
Four candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. Four running for an open seat. Nancy Mace (R), who holds the seat now, is not on the list of those advancing.
Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.
Democrats
Open seat · advanced from the primary · 235 statements classified · $658.1K raised
Open seat · advanced from the primary · 232 statements classified · $4.9M raised
Republicans
Open seat · advanced from the primary · 78 statements classified · $1.3M raised
Open seat · advanced from the primary · 99 statements classified · $956.6K raised
Holds the seat now: Nancy Mace (R), not among the candidates recorded as advancing.
Notes
House districts follow the candidates’ FEC filings; where a state redrew its map for 2026, a candidate may appear under their old district. A sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.
What they say
The candidates’ statements differ most on credit claiming: from 8.9% to 37%. All four candidates have 10 or more classified statements.
An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.
How do the candidates’ statements compare?
Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked House candidates
Personal attacks
Median 2.5% · axis 0–60%
- Deford D7.7%
- Lacore D1.3%
- Honeycutt R1.3%
- Smith R2.0%
Policy criticism
Median 15% · axis 0–60%
- Deford D23%
- Lacore D4.3%
- Honeycutt R2.6%
- Smith R5.1%
Policy discussion
Median 58% · axis 0–60%
- Deford D33%
- Lacore D34%
- Honeycutt R47%
- Smith R29%
Bipartisanship
Median 3.8% · axis 0–60%
- Deford D2.5%
- Lacore D2.2%
- Honeycutt R2.6%
- Smith R3.0%
Credit claiming
Median 16% · axis 0–60%
- Deford D8.9%
- Lacore D9.5%
- Honeycutt R24%
- Smith R37%
Show the data
| Candidate | Party | Statements | Personal attacks | Policy criticism | Policy discussion | Bipartisanship | Credit claiming |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Deford | D | 235 | 7.7% | 23% | 33% | 2.5% | 8.9% |
| Nancy Lacore | D | 232 | 1.3% | 4.3% | 34% | 2.2% | 9.5% |
| Jenny Honeycutt | R | 78 | 1.3% | 2.6% | 47% | 2.6% | 24% |
| Mark Smith | R | 99 | 2.0% | 5.1% | 29% | 3.0% | 37% |
| Median, ranked House candidates | 2.5% | 15% | 58% | 3.8% | 16% |
The five kinds of statement
Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.
Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.
Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).
Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.
Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.
Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked House candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.
Money
Reported receipts range from $658.1K to $4.9M. All four candidates have campaign-finance figures from the FEC.
Totals each campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle: money raised, money spent and cash on hand at the end of the latest filing.
How much has each candidate raised?
Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand
- Nancy Lacore$4.9M$175.3K on hand
- Jenny Honeycutt$1.3M$311.5K on hand
- Mark Smith$956.6K$0 on hand
- William Deford$658.1K$0 on hand
Show the data
| Candidate | Party | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand | Debts | Individuals | PACs | Party committees | Own money | Candidate loans | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nancy Lacore | D | $4.9M | $4.7M | $175.3K | $0 | $4.6M | $258.5K | $5,000 | $0 | $0 | — |
| Jenny Honeycutt | R | $1.3M | $980.5K | $311.5K | $10.0K | $903.0K | $326.5K | $0 | $3,500 | $10.0K | — |
| Mark Smith | R | $956.6K | $956.6K | $0 | $0 | $520.6K | $56.0K | $0 | $0 | $380.0K | — |
| William Deford | D | $658.1K | $658.0K | $0 | $1,000 | $655.6K | $2,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — |