Skip to content

2026 midterms · South Carolina

South Carolina Senate

U.S. Senate · primary Jun 9, 2026 · runoff Jun 23, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026

candidates
2
Democrats
1
Republicans
1
2

candidates advanced

Annie Andrews (D) and Lindsey Graham (R) advanced from the primary held on Jun 9, 2026 (runoff Jun 23, 2026). The general election is on Nov 3, 2026.

The candidates

Two candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. One incumbent and one challenger.

Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.

Democrats

  • Annie AndrewsD

    Challenger · advanced from the primary · 435 statements classified · $24.2M raised

Republicans

Notes

Back to topNext: What they say

What they say

Only Annie Andrews has enough classified statements to measure. The other one candidate has fewer than 10.

An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How do the candidates’ statements compare?

Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked Senate candidates

Show the data
Share of each candidate’s statements of each kind, with the median of ranked Senate candidates: Annie Andrews, personal attacks 9.7%, policy criticism 7.1%, policy discussion 21%, bipartisanship 2.5%, credit claiming 2.8%.
CandidatePartyStatementsPersonal attacksPolicy criticismPolicy discussionBipartisanshipCredit claiming
Annie AndrewsD4359.7%7.1%21%2.5%2.8%
Median, ranked Senate candidates3.1%18%61%5.3%15%
The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked Senate candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Reported receipts range from $6.9M to $24.2M. Both candidates have campaign-finance figures from the FEC.

Totals each campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle: money raised, money spent and cash on hand at the end of the latest filing.

How much has each candidate raised?

Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand

  1. Annie Andrews$24.2M$1.7M on hand
  2. Lindsey Graham$6.9M$314.9K on hand
Show the data
Money raised by the candidates in South Carolina Senate
CandidatePartyRaisedSpentCash on handDebtsIndividualsPACsParty committeesOwn moneyCandidate loansThrough
Annie AndrewsD$24.2M$22.5M$1.7M$0$23.6M$249.7K$0$0$0—
Lindsey GrahamR$6.9M$22.2M$314.9K$0$1.3M$739.5K$62.0K$0$0—
Notes
Individuals, PACs, party committees, a candidate’s own money and loans are split out in the table. Figures are as filed and are not adjusted.

Back to top