2026 midterms · Wisconsin
Wisconsin Governor
Governor · primary Aug 11, 2026 · general election Nov 3, 2026 · rated toss-up
- candidates
- 2
- Democrats
- 2
- Republicans
- 0
candidates advanced
David Crowley (D) and Tom Tiffany (D) advanced from the primary held on Aug 11, 2026. The general election is on Nov 3, 2026.
The candidates
Two candidates recorded as advancing from the primary. Two challengers.
Status is the FEC’s: an incumbent holds the seat, a challenger runs against one, and an open seat has no incumbent running. The lab records a primary’s result once it is official; candidates who did not advance are no longer listed.
Democrats
Challenger · advanced from the primary · 933 statements classified
Challenger · advanced from the primary · 1,432 statements classified
Republicans
No candidate recorded as advancing.
Notes
Rated toss-up. Cook Political Report ratings, entered by the lab (last updated by the lab on Jun 24, 2026); a forecaster’s judgement about the general election, not the lab’s.
What they say
The candidates’ statements differ most on policy criticism: from 12% to 38%. Both candidates have 10 or more classified statements.
An AI model reads each statement and marks the kinds of statement it contains; each bar is the share of a candidate’s statements with that label. Incumbent members of Congress are measured on everything they publish in office, everyone else on posts on X. A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.
How do the candidates’ statements compare?
Share of each candidate’s statements with each label; grey tick: median of ranked governor candidates
Personal attacks
Median 2.1% · axis 0–70%
- Crowley D5.0%
- Tiffany D5.7%
Policy criticism
Median 12% · axis 0–70%
- Crowley D12%
- Tiffany D38%
Policy discussion
Median 47% · axis 0–70%
- Crowley D50%
- Tiffany D66%
Bipartisanship
Median 2.0% · axis 0–70%
- Crowley D3.2%
- Tiffany D1.4%
Credit claiming
Median 16% · axis 0–70%
- Crowley D17%
- Tiffany D13%
Show the data
| Candidate | Party | Statements | Personal attacks | Policy criticism | Policy discussion | Bipartisanship | Credit claiming |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Crowley | D | 933 | 5.0% | 12% | 50% | 3.2% | 17% |
| Tom Tiffany | D | 1,432 | 5.7% | 38% | 66% | 1.4% | 13% |
| Median, ranked governor candidates | 2.1% | 12% | 47% | 2.0% | 16% |
The five kinds of statement
Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.
Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.
Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).
Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.
Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.
Candidates with fewer than 10 classified statements are left out. The grey tick is the median of the ranked governor candidates (50 or more statements), for scale.
Money
Candidates for governor report to their state, not to the Federal Election Commission; no figures for them are on file here.
How much has each candidate raised?
Total receipts reported to the FEC, with cash on hand
No campaign-finance figures are on file for this race’s candidates.