Personal attacks
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
Oct 11, 2026 · Posts on X · personal attacks; policy discussion; Armed Forces and National Security; International Affairs; Energy; target: Trump · Source
16%
of sponsored bills got out of committee, in the top 5% of House Democrats
16% of 32 sponsored bills got out of committee; the average for House Democrats is 4.9%. Ranks 10th of 207, where 1st is the highest share.
The share of bills Kennedy sponsored that a committee reported out or a chamber passed, ranked among House Democrats. Members of the majority party and committee chairs move more bills, so the rank reflects position as well as effort.
At a glance
6 measures against House Democrats. 87% of Kennedy’s itemized money in the 2026 cycle came from New York, in the top tenth of House Democrats. 63% of Kennedy’s statements discuss policy, in the bottom tenth of House Democrats (average 73%).
The measures on which Kennedy sits furthest from the middle of House Democrats, each against the same group, with the CSIP score when there is one. Every number is explained in its own section below.
Out of committee
16%
House Democrats average 4.9% · ranks 10th of 207
From New York, 2026
87%
Of itemized individual dollars · ranks 15th of 214 House Democrats
Policy discussion
63%
House Democrats average 73% · ranks 196th of 216
Attendance
99.8%
House Democrats average 96.9% · ranks 23rd of 217 · 674 roll calls
Small donations, 2026
3.1%
House Democrats’ median 13% · ranks 189th of 214
CSIP ideology
−0.72
Left of 0, the centre of the scale · ± 0.03
Peer group: House Democrats. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; the thick bar is Kennedy, the thin grey bar the peer average. The headline is the measure on which Kennedy is most unusual among peers (Methods, §08).
What Kennedy says
Kennedy stresses bipartisanship less than 81% of House Democrats. Bipartisanship in 5.5% of 1,503 statements, against 9.8% for the average House Democrat; 177th of 216.
An AI model reads each of Kennedy’s 1,503 statements in the 119th Congress (1,212 posts on X, 200 Congressional Record speeches, 71 press releases, 20 newsletters) and marks the kinds of statement it contains: a personal attack, criticism of a policy, discussion of policy, bipartisanship, credit claiming, and extreme labels. A statement can carry several. Every rate is compared with the average for House Democrats and ranked among them.
Kinds of statement
Share of statements carrying each label, the 119th Congress
0%80%
Kennedy
Peers
Rank
Policy discussion951 statements
63%
73%
196th of 216
Policy criticism348 statements
23%
28%
152nd of 216
Credit claiming293 statements
19%
23%
130th of 216
Bipartisanship83 statements
6%
10%
177th of 216
Personal attacks73 statements
5%
7%
123rd of 216
Show the data
| Row | Kennedy | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| Policy discussion | 63% | 73% |
| Policy criticism | 23% | 28% |
| Credit claiming | 19% | 23% |
| Bipartisanship | 6% | 10% |
| Personal attacks | 5% | 7% |
1,503
statements classified
1,212 posts on X, 200 Congressional Record speeches, 71 press releases, 20 newsletters.
Show the data
| Part | Value |
|---|---|
| posts on X | 1,212 |
| Congressional Record speeches | 200 |
| press releases | 71 |
| newsletters | 20 |
How to read the bars
The thick bar is Kennedy; the thin grey bar is the average House Democrats. A longer thick bar means Kennedy does this more than peers. Rank 1 is the highest rate in the group.
Extreme labels
Kennedy used extreme labels in 1.1% of statements, below the peer average. 16 statements, most often aimed at DHS; peers 1.9%.
- “extreme”7
- “MAGA”2
- “far right”2
Who gets the labels
Targets named alongside an extreme label, by number of statements
- DHS2
- Donald Trump2
- Trump administration2
- Confederates1
- congressional Republicans1
What an extreme label is
Calls a politician, a party or a policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who or what the label was aimed at. The lists show the five most used labels and targets; the toggle shows the rest.
Month by month
Share of statements per month, the 119th Congress
Show the data
| Column | Statements | Personal attacks | Policy criticism | Policy discussion | Bipartisanship | Credit claiming | Extreme labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan ’25 | 54 | 0.0% | 9.3% | 38.9% | 7.4% | 25.9% | 0.0% |
| Feb ’25 | 73 | 8.2% | 37.0% | 71.2% | 5.5% | 21.9% | 0.0% |
| Mar ’25 | 94 | 2.1% | 23.4% | 70.2% | 8.5% | 31.9% | 1.1% |
| Apr ’25 | 98 | 1.0% | 28.6% | 62.2% | 4.1% | 23.5% | 1.0% |
| May ’25 | 87 | 1.1% | 19.5% | 54.0% | 4.6% | 18.4% | 1.1% |
| Jun ’25 | 74 | 0.0% | 21.6% | 54.0% | 2.7% | 10.8% | 2.7% |
| Jul ’25 | 79 | 1.3% | 27.9% | 57.0% | 1.3% | 10.1% | 0.0% |
| Aug ’25 | 35 | 0.0% | 34.3% | 71.4% | 0.0% | 25.7% | 2.9% |
| Sep ’25 | 65 | 1.5% | 20.0% | 55.4% | 12.3% | 30.8% | 0.0% |
| Oct ’25 | 67 | 6.0% | 41.8% | 62.7% | 7.5% | 17.9% | 0.0% |
| Nov ’25 | 71 | 5.6% | 31.0% | 57.8% | 1.4% | 16.9% | 0.0% |
| Dec ’25 | 53 | 3.8% | 22.6% | 77.4% | 7.5% | 22.6% | 1.9% |
| Jan ’26 | 51 | 11.8% | 9.8% | 72.5% | 3.9% | 13.7% | 0.0% |
| Feb ’26 | 65 | 9.2% | 29.2% | 61.5% | 4.6% | 12.3% | 1.5% |
| Mar ’26 | 64 | 3.1% | 21.9% | 59.4% | 10.9% | 25.0% | 1.6% |
| Apr ’26 | 76 | 6.6% | 18.4% | 67.1% | 6.6% | 18.4% | 1.3% |
| May ’26 | 85 | 3.5% | 16.5% | 43.5% | 7.1% | 15.3% | 2.4% |
| Jun ’26 | 86 | 5.8% | 29.1% | 60.5% | 2.3% | 19.8% | 0.0% |
| Jul ’26 | 60 | 8.3% | 18.3% | 75.0% | 11.7% | 30.0% | 5.0% |
| Aug ’26 | 54 | 14.8% | 18.5% | 83.3% | 1.8% | 13.0% | 1.8% |
| Sep ’26 | 51 | 15.7% | 15.7% | 80.4% | 5.9% | 11.8% | 0.0% |
| Oct ’26 | 61 | 4.9% | 6.6% | 78.7% | 3.3% | 11.5% | 0.0% |
How to read the strips
Each row is one kind of statement; each cell is a month, shaded against that row’s own peak (darker = closer to the peak), with the peak and the latest value written at the right. The top row counts statements. The strip covers every month of the 119th Congress, the same span as the rates above, including months with no statements. A month with fewer than 10 statements is hatched, not shaded: one or two posts would swing its rate to 0% or 100%.
In Kennedy’s words
Real statements from the classifier’s example set, with the labels it assigned
Bipartisanship
Kennedy, New York Delegation Demand DHS Release $87 Million in Counterterrorism Funding Still Owed to New York One Year After Trump Promised Full Reversal of Funding Cuts, First Responders Statewide are Still Without Millions in Federal Investments BUFFALO, N.Y. – Congressman Tim Kennedy (NY-26), R…
Oct 13, 2026 · Press releases · policy discussion; bipartisanship; Emergency Management; Armed Forces and National Security; Crime and Law Enforcement · Source
Extreme label
Rep. Kennedy's July Recap Newsletter Congressman Kennedy's NewsletterJuly Recap Dear , Republicans in Washington had a choice: they could focus on lowering costs for hardworking families, or they could give President Trump another blank check to expand a reckless war in Iran. They chose war and the…
Aug 3, 2026 · Newsletters · policy discussion; credit claiming; Health; Government Operations and Politics; Energy; Families; Law; Education; Emergency Management; Economics and Public Finance; Crime and Law Enforcement; Water Resources Development; Taxation; Public Lands and Natural Resources; Agriculture and Food; Labor and Employment; Housing and Community Development; Science, Technology, Communications; International Affairs; Commerce; Environmental Protection; Armed Forces and National Security; Transportation and Public Works; Immigration; Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues; extreme label “extreme” aimed at Trump administration
Examples by category
Up to five recent statements in each category
Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · policy discussion · Armed Forces and National Security · International Affairs · Energy · target: TrumpSource
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · policy discussion · Immigration · Economics and Public Finance · target: Donald Trump, Markwayne MullinSource
Newsletters
Rep. Kennedy's September Recap Newsletter Congressman Kennedy's NewsletterSeptember Recap Dear , Families across Western New York are working harder and paying more just to get by. Groceries, energy, utilities, housing, healthcare, and other everyday costs continue to put real pressure on household budgets. And while families are struggling to keep up, Speaker Johnson and Congressional Republicans fled Washington in…
personal attacks · policy discussion · bipartisanship · credit claiming · Health · Housing and Community Development · Government Operations and Politics · Energy · Families · Law · Economics and Public Finance · Crime and Law Enforcement · Water Resources Development · Taxation · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Labor and Employment · International Affairs · Commerce · Transportation and Public Works · Immigration · Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues · Armed Forces and National Security · Environmental Protection · Agriculture and Food · Foreign Trade and International Finance · target: Donald Trump
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · policy discussion · Government Operations and Politics · Economics and Public Finance · target: Donald TrumpSource
Posts on X
The text of this post is on X; follow the source link to read it.
personal attacks · policy discussion · Economics and Public Finance · Agriculture and Food · Energy · target: TrumpSource
All 1,503 statements
Newest first, the 119th Congress
The full feed
Five statements at a time, newest first; filters apply to the statements loaded so far. Export saves the statements that match. Sources: 1,212 posts on X, 200 Congressional Record speeches, 71 press releases, 20 newsletters.
Policy
Health is what Kennedy talks about most: 27% of policy statements. Talk and legislation agree at 0.69 on a 0–1 scale (House Democrats average 0.67; 85th of 216).
Each policy statement is tagged by the AI model with one or more of 25 policy areas from the Congressional Research Service list, so the shares say what Kennedy talks about. The bills Kennedy sponsors and cosponsors carry the same areas, so the two can be compared.
What Kennedy talks about
Share of policy statements by area, the 119th Congress
0%35%
Kennedy
Peers
Health261 statements
27%
26%
Government Operations and Politics171 statements
18%
20%
Economics and Public Finance157 statements
17%
20%
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues146 statements
15%
13%
Armed Forces and National Security133 statements
14%
16%
Show the data
| Row | Kennedy | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| Health | 27% | 26% |
| Government Operations and Politics | 18% | 20% |
| Economics and Public Finance | 17% | 20% |
| Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues | 15% | 13% |
| Armed Forces and National Security | 14% | 16% |
How to read the bars
The thick bar is the share of Kennedy’s policy statements in an area; the thin grey bar is the average share for House Democrats. A statement counts once in each of its areas, so shares can add to more than 100%. The five largest areas are shown; the toggle shows the rest.
Talks about · legislates on
Left: share of statements by policy area. Right: share of bills. Areas in order of their share of statements; both sides run from 0 to 35%. Grey ticks are the House Democrats averages.
Show the data
| Area | Talks about | House Democrats, talks about | Legislates on | House Democrats, legislates on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 27% | 26% | 16% | 16% |
| Government Operations and Politics | 18% | 20% | 13% | 11% |
| Economics and Public Finance | 17% | 20% | 0% | 1% |
| Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues | 15% | 13% | 4% | 5% |
| Armed Forces and National Security | 14% | 16% | 13% | 7% |
0.69
talk-to-bills agreement, 0 to 1
House Democrats average 0.67. Ranks 85th of 216.
What agreement means, and what it doesn’t
Agreement is 1 minus the distance between the two distributions (Jensen–Shannon): 1 means Kennedy legislates on exactly the areas Kennedy talks about, in the same proportions; 0 means no overlap. It does not say whether the bills match the positions in the statements, only the subjects. Bills Kennedy sponsored count fully, cosponsored bills a quarter. Shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
Ideology
Kennedy sits at −0.72 on the CSIP scale, left of 0, more conservative than 82% of House Democrats. Approximate range −0.75 to −0.70, which understates the uncertainty; from 1,981 donors and 1,812 roll calls.
CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official, federal and state, on one left–right scale, estimated from roll-call votes, who gives money to whom, and the text of statements. Negative is left of 0, positive right of it; 0 is the centre of the scale, not a definition of “moderate”.
−0.72
CSIP ideal point
Approximate range −0.75 to −0.70. From 1,981 donors and 1,812 roll calls. Run 2026-10-25T215945. Blue is left of 0, red right of 0.
The outlined dot is Kennedy, coloured by its side of 0 (blue left, red right, deeper further out); the bar through it is the approximate range (±1.96 standard errors), which understates the uncertainty; the grey ticks below are the medians of Kennedy’s groups. 0 is the centre of the scale, not “moderate” by definition.
What this means, and what it doesn’t
The score summarises how an official votes, who funds them and how they talk, relative to everyone else. It does not grade positions as good or bad, and two officials with the same score can differ on any single issue. The ± range is 1.96 standard errors, which understates the uncertainty: scores whose ranges overlap may not differ at all, and even scores whose ranges do not overlap may not differ.
Where Kennedy sits
Every official in each group, on the CSIP scale
House Democrats217 · median −1.0
All House439 · median +0.3
Show the data
| Group | Officials | Median | Share left of Kennedy |
|---|---|---|---|
| House Democrats | 217 | −1.0 | 82% |
| All House | 439 | +0.3 | 41% |
How to read the strips
Every small dot is one official on the same scale, coloured by its own score (blue left of 0, red right of 0, grey at 0, deeper further out) and spread up and down only to keep dots apart; where a group is crowded the dots overlap, and darker patches mean more officials. The large outlined dot is Kennedy in every row; the rule is each group’s median. The table under the figure gives the share of each group to the left of Kennedy.
Money
Kennedy raised $2.8M in the 2026 cycle, above the House Democrats’ median of $2.0M. 3.1% of individual money came in gifts of $200 or less. 87% of itemized individual money came from New York.
Campaign money from Federal Election Commission filings, as aggregates only; the lab never shows an individual donor. Campaigns must report by name every person who gives them more than $200 in a cycle (“itemized”); smaller gifts are reported only as one total (“unitemized”), so donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations describe itemized donors only.
$2.8M
raised in the 2026 cycle
From 783 itemized donors. House Democrats’ median $2.0M.
Where the money came from
Each square is one percent of 2026-cycle receipts, from FEC summary totals.
- Itemized individual (over $200)70 squares$1.9M
- Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less)2 squares$61.9K
- PACs and other committees27 squares$754.8K
- Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds)1 squares$24.1K
Show the data
| Source | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Itemized individual (over $200) | $1.9M | 69.5% |
| Unitemized individual (gifts of $200 or less) | $61.9K | 2.2% |
| PACs and other committees | $754.8K | 27.3% |
| Remainder not broken out in the FEC summary (transfers, loans, refunds) | $24.1K | 0.9% |
What this means, and what it doesn’t
Totals say how much a campaign took in, not how it was spent, and they rise sharply when a seat is up for election; compare cycles with that in mind. The small-donor share understates small giving when a campaign itemizes gifts made through ActBlue or WinRed.
Receipts by cycle
Total receipts, 2024 to 2026. The grey line is the House Democrats’ median for 2026.
Show the data
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| 2024 cycle | $2.7M |
| 2026 cycle | $2.8M |
Top donor states, 2026
Itemized contributions by donor state. 87% came from New York.
- New York$1.4M
- New Jersey$42.5K
- California$35.8K
- Maryland$26.3K
- Florida$24.1K
Small donations
Gifts of $200 or less as a share of individual money, by cycle. The thin grey bar is the 2026 House Democrats’ median.
0%60%
Kennedy
Median
2026
3%
13%
2024
6%
13%
Show the data
| Row | Kennedy | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 cycle | 3% | 13% |
| 2024 cycle | 6% | 13% |
Where itemized donors live
Individuals who gave more than $200, by donor state
Show the data
| State | Value |
|---|---|
| New York | $1.4M |
| New Jersey | $42.5K |
| California | $35.8K |
| Maryland | $26.3K |
| Florida | $24.1K |
| Connecticut | $19.9K |
| District of Columbia | $17.6K |
| Arizona | $7,000 |
| Pennsylvania | $6,750 |
| Rhode Island | $6,600 |
| North Carolina | $3,070 |
| Nevada | $2,500 |
| Massachusetts | $2,250 |
| Louisiana | $2,035 |
| Virginia | $2,009 |
| South Carolina | $1,285 |
| Delaware | $1,017 |
| Illinois | $1,000 |
| Alaska | No data |
| Maine | No data |
| Vermont | No data |
| New Hampshire | No data |
| Washington | No data |
| Idaho | No data |
| Montana | No data |
| North Dakota | No data |
| Minnesota | No data |
| Wisconsin | No data |
| Michigan | No data |
| Oregon | No data |
| Wyoming | No data |
| South Dakota | No data |
| Iowa | No data |
| Indiana | No data |
| Ohio | No data |
| Utah | No data |
| Colorado | No data |
| Nebraska | No data |
| Missouri | No data |
| Kentucky | No data |
| West Virginia | No data |
| New Mexico | No data |
| Kansas | No data |
| Arkansas | No data |
| Tennessee | No data |
| Oklahoma | No data |
| Mississippi | No data |
| Alabama | No data |
| Georgia | No data |
| Hawaii | No data |
| Texas | No data |
783
itemized donors
People who gave more than $200
87%
from New York
Of itemized individual dollars
How to read the map
Every state the same size. Darker states gave more itemized money; hatched states had no itemized donors; the outlined state is New York. Gifts of $200 or less carry no address and are left out.
Donors’ ideology
Distribution of itemized donors’ own CSIP scores
Show the data
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| CSIP −1.50 to −1.25 | 0.1% |
| CSIP −1.25 to −1.00 | 2.3% |
| CSIP −1.00 to −0.75 | 20% |
| CSIP −0.75 to −0.50 | 58% |
| CSIP −0.50 to −0.25 | 6.4% |
| CSIP −0.25 to 0.00 | 4.1% |
| CSIP 0.00 to +0.25 | 3.4% |
| CSIP +0.25 to +0.50 | 4.1% |
| CSIP +0.50 to +0.75 | 1.7% |
| CSIP +0.75 to +1.00 | 0.1% |
How to read the columns
Donors who give to many candidates get their own CSIP score. Each column is the share of Kennedy’s itemized money from donors in that part of the scale, blue left of 0 and red right of 0, deeper further out; Kennedy’s own score is −0.72.
Top donor occupations
Itemized, 2026 cycle.
- BUSINESS OWNER$168.7K 73 donors
- PRESIDENT$142.8K 57 donors
- ATTORNEY$142.0K 84 donors
- NOT EMPLOYED$120.9K 77 donors
- CEO$113.0K 32 donors
Top committees
PAC and committee contributions, 2026 cycle.
- AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE$10.0K
- AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION$10.0K
- AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC$10.0K
- AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION PHYSICAL THERAPY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PT-PAC)$10.0K
- CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS$10.0K
Top employers
Itemized, 2026 cycle.
- APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT$24.5K 5 donors
- GREAT LAKES ANESTHESIOLOGY$22.0K 4 donors
- HODGSON RUSS, LLP$11.3K 3 donors
- ERIE COUNTY$6,903 7 donors
- APOLLO$5,605 3 donors
Aggregates only. Individual donors are never named.
Votes
Kennedy voted with the majority of House Democrats on 97.2% of party-line votes and missed 0.1% of 674 roll calls. House Democrats on average: 96.4% party unity, 96.9% attendance. Across all roll calls, Kennedy voted against the majority of House Democrats 14 times.
674 roll calls Kennedy could vote on in the 119th Congress, compared with House Democrats. Attendance is the share with a vote recorded. Party unity counts only party-line roll calls, where most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides, and is the share of those where Kennedy voted with the majority of House Democrats. The count of votes against that majority covers every roll call where the majority took a side.
14
votes against the majority of House Democrats
Party unity 97.2%, House Democrats average 96.4%, ranks 138th of 217. 674 roll calls in the 119th Congress.
Attendance and party unity
The thick bar is Kennedy, the thin grey bar the House Democrats average. The scale runs from 80% to 100% to show the gap.
80%100%
Kennedy
Peers
Rank
Attendance
99.8%
96.9%
23rd of 217
Party unity
97.2%
96.4%
138th of 217
Show the data
| Row | Kennedy | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance | 99.8% | 96.9% |
| Party unity | 97.2% | 96.4% |
What this means, and what it doesn’t
A missed roll call has many causes, from illness to campaigning, so attendance says how often, not why. A vote against the majority can be on procedure as well as substance, and many fall on roll calls where both parties split; the key votes below show the ones that decided something.
Key votes
25 roll calls the lab flagged as key in the 119th Congress
| Party split (yea–nay) | Why it’s key | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | Yea | With majority | Passed | D 209–0 · R 191–14 · I 1–0Democrats 209 yea, 0 nay; Republicans 191 yea, 14 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | became law | |
| Sep 16, 2026 | H.J.Res. 213 Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the “California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision” On Passage | Nay | With majority | Passed | D 3–207 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 3 yea, 207 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | close vote |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Nay | With majority | Passed | D 6–206 · R 210–1 · I 1–0Democrats 6 yea, 206 nay; Republicans 210 yea, 1 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | close vote | |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Yea | With majority | Passed | D 139–72 · R 212–0 · I 1–0Democrats 139 yea, 72 nay; Republicans 212 yea, 0 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | party crossover | |
| Sep 16, 2026 | H.R. 5334 An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendments | Nay | With majority | Passed | D 58–152 · R 203–7 · I 1–0Democrats 58 yea, 152 nay; Republicans 203 yea, 7 nay; Independents 1 yea, 0 nay | became law · party crossover |
How key votes are chosen
Automatically: a final-passage or override vote where the measure became law, the margin was under 10%, at least 10% of either party voted against its majority, or the bill was among the 25 most mentioned in officials’ own statements. Up to 25 per window, most recent first; five are shown. Bars show yea on the left, nay on the right, per party.
Votes most often with
The colleagues who voted the same way as Kennedy most often
- Johnny OlszewskiD668 shared votes99%
- Joyce BeattyD633 shared votes98%
- Frederica WilsonD479 shared votes98%
- Suzan DelBeneD660 shared votes98%
- Cleo FieldsD651 shared votes98%
Votes least often with
The colleagues who voted the same way as Kennedy least often
- Chip RoyR633 shared votes17%
- Eric BurlisonR641 shared votes19%
- Andy BiggsR607 shared votes19%
- Keith SelfR658 shared votes19%
- Ralph NormanR596 shared votes19%
How to read the agreement lists
The share of roll calls both members voted on where they voted the same way, among colleagues sharing at least 50 such votes. High agreement with members of the other party is common on routine votes.
Full voting record
119th Congress (2025–27), loads in batches
Legislation
Kennedy sponsored 32 bills in the 119th Congress; none became law. Cosponsored 544 others. 16% of sponsored bills got out of committee (House Democrats average 4.9%; 10th of 207).
The bills Kennedy sponsored and cosponsored in the 119th Congress, from the official bill records, and how far each got: introduced, referred to or acted on in committee, passed one chamber, passed both, became law. A bill counts at every stage it has reached, so the blocks only shrink to the right.
Bills by stage
Counts for the 119th Congress
Show the data
| Role | Introduced | In committee | Passed one chamber | Passed both chambers | Became law |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sponsored | 32 | 32 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Cosponsored | 544 | 544 | 27 | 2 | 1 |
How to read the blocks
Ink blocks are bills Kennedy sponsored, ochre blocks bills Kennedy cosponsored; the figure above each block is the count. Most bills in any legislature never leave committee, so a short staircase is the norm.
16%
of sponsored bills got out of committee
House Democrats average 4.9%. Ranks 10th of 207.
Cosponsorship partners
Colleagues who most often cosponsor with Kennedy, by number of shared bills in the 119th Congress; the square shows their party.
- Eleanor Norton54
- Michael Lawler44
- Dan Goldman36
- Shri Thanedar33
- Brian Fitzpatrick29
What this means, and what it doesn’t
The score is the share of sponsored bills that a committee reported out or a chamber passed, with at least 5 sponsored bills, ranked within the peer group. Members of the majority party and committee chairs move more bills, so the rank reflects position in the chamber as well as effort. Cosponsorship partners are the five colleagues who share the most of Kennedy’s bills; the toggle shows more.
Bill list
Sponsored and cosponsored, with status and policy area; five are shown, the toggle shows the rest
| H.R. 10853 | Yemen TPS Act | Cosponsor | Oct 19, 2026 | In committee | Unassigned | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. Oct 19, 2026 |
| H.R. 10779 | To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1905 Route 112 in Medford, New York, as the "Gunnery Sergeant Ruben Santos Post Office Building". | Cosponsor | Oct 9, 2026 | In committee | Government Operations and Politics | Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Oct 9, 2026 |
| H.R. 10794 | Improving Access to WIC Act | Cosponsor | Oct 9, 2026 | In committee | Agriculture and Food | Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. Oct 9, 2026 |
| H.R. 10686 | Community Disaster Protection Act | Cosponsor | Oct 1, 2026 | In committee | Emergency Management | Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. Oct 1, 2026 |
| H.R. 10692 | Restoring Essential Plan Coverage Act | Cosponsor | Oct 1, 2026 | In committee | Taxation | Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Oct 1, 2026 |
Online
A site that changed 62 times in 90 days. Kennedy’s official site had 28 pages when last crawled on Oct 25, 2026. The lab last catalogued the images Kennedy posted on Oct 26, 2026.
The lab crawls Kennedy’s official and campaign websites (weekly for Congress, monthly for the states) and keeps every page’s text, so changes can be read later; it also records social accounts and describes the images Kennedy posts with a vision model.
Websites
- 28
pages crawled
62changes in 90 days
- 7
pages crawled
4changes in 90 days
How to read the counts
“Pages crawled” is the size of the site at the last crawl; “changes in 90 days” counts pages whose text differed from the previous crawl. Sites change for many routine reasons, such as new press releases, so a high count is not by itself notable.
Social accounts
- Xreptimkennedy
- Xkennedyforny26
- Facebookreptimkennedy
- Instagramreptimkennedy
- YouTubereptimkennedy
Images Kennedy posted
The latest 24, with model-written descriptions
A man speaking at a podium and a woman in an orange coat interacting at an outdoor Salvation Army event. Microphones, a phone on a stand, red and white balloons, and event signage are visible. The image contains text.View post 
A blue political event poster featuring a group of people standing behind a ribbon outside a building during a ribbon-cutting ceremony. Large promotional text overlays the photo, with a date banner near the top and a representative's name and logo at the bottom.View post 
A group of officials and uniformed personnel pose outside a modern brick-and-glass building during a ribbon-cutting ceremony. Several people hold scissors beside a red ribbon. There is text on the ceremonial ribbon.View post 
A close-up of a stone building facade with large raised metal lettering. A security camera is mounted near the roofline, and a brick wall borders the right edge.View post 
A political weekly-recap graphic for a congressman, featuring three event photos: a group at a ribbon-cutting, two people at an event, and people on a convention stage. The graphic has a blue background with large headings and other text.View post
About the descriptions
Written by a vision model and may be wrong. Open the post to see the original. Five are shown; the toggle shows the rest.
Methods and sources
How this page was made. Profile built Oct 28, 2026; site last built Oct 28, 2026. Every number on the page is computed from the sources listed here, by the same rules for every official; nothing is written by hand.
The headline
The headline is the measure on which Kennedy is most unusual among House Democrats, chosen by one rule for every official of every party. The candidates are the rate of each kind of statement and of extreme labels, party unity, attendance, the small-donor share, the in-state share and total receipts of the latest cycle, the share of sponsored bills that got out of committee, talk-to-bills agreement, and the CSIP score’s place within the party group.
The builder ranks every measure within the same peer group the page compares it with, and writes each official’s percentile: the share of the group below the value, ties counting half, so 0.5 is the median and a value shared by many never ranks first. A measure’s score is how far that percentile sits from the median (0 in the middle, 0.5 at either end), and the highest score leads if it is above 0.25, outside the middle half of the group. Scores within 0.03 of each other are a tie, broken in this order: votes against the party majority, kinds of statement, ideology, roll calls missed, small donations, in-state money, legislation, agreement, extreme labels, receipts.
A measure counts only with at least 200 statements, 100 roll calls or 5 sponsored bills behind it and a peer group of at least 10. Two things never lead: high party unity or attendance, where most members sit, and a high rate of a kind of statement backed by fewer than 10 statements. When nothing qualifies, the headline is a neutral fact instead: statements classified, or years in office. The wording always names the direction (“in the bottom 5% of …”, “votes against the majority of …”).
Identifiers
- Profile id
- K000402
- Bioguide
- K000402
- FEC candidate ids
- H4NY26078
Bulk files with the same data for every official:
Freshness of this profile’s data
- What politicians sayOct 27, 20261 days agoMembers of Congress: tweets since 2017; press releases, newsletters and floor speeches since 2022. State legislators: tweets since May 2024. Governors: tweets since January 2025. Labels from an LLM classifier.
- Roll calls (Congress)Sep 30, 202628 days agoVoteview roll calls, 113th Congress (2013) on.
- Bills (Congress)Oct 22, 20266 days agoGovInfo BILLSTATUS: sponsors, cosponsors, actions, CRS policy area.
- Campaign money (FEC)Oct 22, 20266 days agoFEC committee financial summaries (totals, small donations) and itemized contributions (donor counts, states, employers), cycles 2020-2026; aggregates only.
- Ideology (CSIP)Oct 25, 20263 days agoCommon-Space Ideal Points (CSIP), current validated run.
- WebsitesOct 25, 20263 days agoWeekly crawls of federal sites since April 2026; monthly state crawls since June 2026.
- ImagesOct 28, 2026todayImages in members' tweets with vision-model descriptions.
How the measures work
- What politicians say
- Every post, press release, newsletter and congressional floor speech is read by a language model and marked for personal attacks, policy criticism, policy discussion, bipartisanship and credit claiming. A statement can be in several. Rates are shares of statements in the window. The methods paper.
- Extreme labels
- A statement has an extreme label when it calls a politician, party or policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”. The target is who the label is aimed at.
- Policy areas and agreement
- Statements and bills share 25 Congressional Research Service policy areas (state bills are assigned by a language model). Agreement is 1 − Jensen–Shannon distance between the two distributions, shown with at least 20 policy statements and 5 bills.
- Ideology (CSIP)
- Common-Space Ideal Points place federal and state officials on one left–right scale, estimated jointly from roll calls, campaign contributions and the text of statements, with standard errors. Only a validated run is shown. The methods paper.
- Campaign money
- Campaigns report by name only donors who give more than $200 in a cycle; smaller gifts are reported as one total. Federal totals and the small-donor share come from the FEC’s financial summaries of each campaign committee. Donor counts, donor states, employers and occupations cover itemized donors only. State filings report no small-gift totals, so state figures are itemized only. The lab never publishes donor names.
- Votes and key votes
- Attendance, party unity and the count of votes against the majority of an official’s own party come from roll calls (Voteview for Congress, chamber records for the states). Key votes are final-passage or override votes that became law, were decided by under 10%, saw at least 10% of a party vote against its majority, or concerned one of the 25 bills most mentioned in officials’ statements.
- Peers and ranks
- Comparisons are with the same party, chamber and level (for example House Democrats); state legislators are compared within their state and chamber for votes. Every comparison names its group. Rank 1 is the highest value in the group; tied values share the average of their ranks, and the percentile is the share of the group below the value, ties counting half.
America’s Political Pulse · Polarization Research Lab