Skip to content

Federal level · Current term

Democrats

Democrats in Congress

statements analyzed
406,596
officials covered
262
last updated
Oct 28, 2026

What each party owns

This comparison needs both parties.

Each bar is the share of Democrats’ policy statements that name an area minus the share of Republicans’ that do, in percentage points, among 262 Democrats in Congress in the current term. Bars to the right are areas Democrats name more often; bars to the left, areas Republicans name more often. The AI model tags each policy statement with any of the Congressional Research Service’s 25 policy areas. The figures beside each bar are both parties’ shares.

This comparison needs both parties. It is on the United States dashboard.

Back to topNext: Who stands out

Who stands out

The five highest rates on four kinds of statement among 262 Democrats in Congress. An official needs at least 50 statements in the current term to be ranked.

An AI model labels every statement. An official’s rate is the share of their statements that carry a label.

Most personal attacks

Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

  1. 1Christopher MurphyDU.S. Senate · Connecticut28%
  2. 2Chris Van HollenDU.S. Senate · Maryland23%
  3. 3Lloyd DoggettDU.S. House · TX-3723%
  4. 4Tammy DuckworthDU.S. Senate · Illinois22%
  5. 5Chuck SchumerDU.S. Senate · New York21%

Most credit claiming

Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

  1. 1Jon OssoffDU.S. Senate · Georgia58%
  2. 2John MannionDU.S. House · NY-2249%
  3. 3Eleanor NortonDU.S. House · DC at-large48%
  4. 4Ed CaseDU.S. House · HI-0148%
  5. 5Gabriel (Gabe) VasquezDU.S. House · NM-0247%

Most bipartisan language

Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

  1. 1Jon OssoffDU.S. Senate · Georgia50%
  2. 2John MannionDU.S. House · NY-2234%
  3. 3Emily RandallDU.S. House · WA-0633%
  4. 4Jared GoldenDU.S. House · ME-0233%
  5. 5Gary PetersDU.S. Senate · Michigan33%

Most policy-focused

Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

  1. 1Christopher MurphyDU.S. Senate · Connecticut91%
  2. 2Jeanne ShaheenDU.S. Senate · New Hampshire90%
  3. 3John LarsonDU.S. House · CT-0189%
  4. 4Maria CantwellDU.S. Senate · Washington88%
  5. 5Jon OssoffDU.S. Senate · Georgia87%

Each official’s rates are on their profile and in the bulk file.

Back to topNext: Party comparison

Party comparison

Democrats talk about policy in 74% of statements; 8.1% attack opponents personally and 2.1% use extreme labels. The most-discussed policy area is Health (26% of policy statements).

Each bar is the share of a party’s statements that carry a label, pooled across 262 Democrats in Congress in the current term. Officials who post more count more. A statement can carry several labels, so a party’s shares can sum to more than 100%.

Statements by label and party

Share of each party’s statements, the current term

  • Personal attacks
  • Policy criticism
  • Policy discussion
  • Bipartisanship
  • Credit claiming
  • Extreme labels
Show the data
Share of statements in each category by party, Democrats: Personal attacks Democrats 8.1%; Policy criticism Democrats 31%; Policy discussion Democrats 74%; Bipartisanship Democrats 11%; Credit claiming Democrats 23%; Extreme labels Democrats 2.1%.
MeasureDemocrats
Personal attacks8.1%
Policy criticism31%
Policy discussion74%
Bipartisanship11%
Credit claiming23%
Extreme labels2.1%
The measures

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Extreme labels. Calls a politician, a party or a policy “far left”, “far right”, “MAGA”, “extreme”, “radical”, “woke”, “fascist” or “communist”.

Personal attacks by venue

Share of statements by 262 Democrats in Congress, the current term

Democrats’ personal-attack rate runs from 7.2% of their posts on X to 13.2% of their newsletters.

0%5%10%15%Posts on X321,634 statementsPress releases50,330 statementsNewsletters11,076 statementsFloor speeches23,556 statements7.2%11.5%13.2%10.6%DemocratsDemocrats
Show the data
Slope chart of each party’s personal-attack rate across four venues, the current term. Democrats: posts on x 7.2%, press releases 11.5%, newsletters 13.2%, floor speeches 10.6%.
VenueDemocrats: personal attacksDemocrats: statements
Posts on X7.2%321634
Press releases11.5%50330
Newsletters13.2%11076
Floor speeches10.6%23556
Notes

Each point is the share of a party’s statements in one venue that the AI model labelled a personal attack, pooled across members. A line joins each party’s four venues. A statement counts once and carries the label if any of its passages does.

Posts on X are 79% of the 406,596 statements here, so the pooled rates elsewhere on this page sit closest to the X points.

A party needs 50 statements in a venue before its point is drawn.

Back to topNext: Polarization

Polarization

The median Democrat scores −1.03 on the CSIP scale.

CSIP, the lab’s Common-Space Ideal Point, places every official on one left–right scale estimated from roll-call votes, campaign contributions and the text of their statements. Negative scores are to the left and positive scores to the right. The gap is the distance between the two parties’ medians.

CSIP scores by party

← More liberal · 0 · More conservative →

−2.0−1.00.0+1.0+2.0← More liberalMore conservative →Democratsmedian −1.0
Show the data
CSIP distributions of 262 Democrats (median −1.03) on one scale from −2 to +2.
GroupOfficialsMedian
Democrats262−1.0

Gap between the party medians

By election cycle

The gap needs both parties.

Notes

Each dot is one official, blue left of 0 and red right of 0, darker further from 0. Overlapping dots form darker patches where officials cluster. The rule in each row marks the party median.

Each official’s score is on their profile, and the full table is in Downloads.

Back to topNext: Trends

Policy topics

Government Operations and Politics led in Sep ’26, named in 23% of policy statements. Science, Technology, Communications rose most from Aug ’26 (+5.1 pts); Agriculture and Food fell most (−1.7 pts).

The AI model tags each policy statement with any of 25 policy areas, so shares can sum to more than 100%. A share is the percentage of a month’s policy statements by members of Congress that name the area. The lists compare the last two complete months, with changes in percentage points. A month needs at least ten policy statements to be compared.

Most discussed, Sep ’26

13,235 policy statements; change since Aug ’26 in grey

  1. Government Operations and Politics23% +2.8 pts
  2. Armed Forces and National Security19% +1.9 pts
  3. Health19% −0.8 pts
  4. Economics and Public Finance19% −1.4 pts
  5. Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues13% +1.1 pts

Rising

Up most since Aug ’26

  1. Science, Technology, Communications+5.1 pts
  2. Energy+3.0 pts
  3. Government Operations and Politics+2.8 pts

Falling

Down most since Aug ’26

  1. Agriculture and Food−1.7 pts
  2. Emergency Management−1.6 pts
  3. Economics and Public Finance−1.4 pts

Back to topNext: States

States

Officials’ personal attacks and residents’ affective polarization are barely related across states. Personal attacks run from 0.2% of statements in Kansas to 18.0% in Tennessee; affective polarization runs from 47 points in Alaska to 56 in Maine. Across the 39 states on both maps, the correlation is −0.01.

The left map is the share of statements by each state’s congressional delegation that the AI model labelled a personal attack, the current term (members of Congress, by the state they represent). The right map is the lab’s survey estimate of affective polarization in each state: residents’ rating of their own party minus their rating of the other, on a 0–100 thermometer. Each state is a square of the same size, shaded by quintile; darker is higher.

Personal attacks by state

Share of statements, the current term · members of Congress

Alaska: no dataAKMaine: 5.4% (1,136)ME5.4%Vermont: 11.9% (4,119)VT11.9%New Hampshire: 2.9% (7,288)NH2.9%Washington: 9.4% (16,912)WA9.4%Idaho: no dataIDMontana: no dataMTNorth Dakota: no dataNDMinnesota: 6.3% (9,849)MN6.3%Illinois: 9.4% (26,780)IL9.4%Wisconsin: 8.9% (5,280)WI8.9%Michigan: 5.9% (12,763)MI5.9%New York: 8.4% (32,410)NY8.4%Rhode Island: 11.7% (12,293)RI11.7%Massachusetts: 12.9% (18,654)MA12.9%Oregon: 8.0% (11,803)OR8.0%Nevada: 4.7% (12,162)NV4.7%Wyoming: no dataWYSouth Dakota: no dataSDIowa: no dataIAIndiana: 2.3% (1,435)IN2.3%Ohio: 5.2% (9,474)OH5.2%Pennsylvania: 5.9% (10,895)PA5.9%New Jersey: 7.3% (19,903)NJ7.3%Connecticut: 10.8% (12,908)CT10.8%California: 7.7% (57,663)CA7.7%Utah: no dataUTColorado: 10.4% (10,221)CO10.4%Nebraska: no dataNEMissouri: 5.4% (3,507)MO5.4%Kentucky: 6.6% (1,254)KY6.6%West Virginia: no dataWVVirginia: 9.3% (15,900)VA9.3%Maryland: 9.6% (13,002)MD9.6%Delaware: 7.1% (4,202)DE7.1%Arizona: 8.3% (9,542)AZ8.3%New Mexico: 7.7% (9,067)NM7.7%Kansas: 0.2% (1,966)KS0.2%Arkansas: no dataARTennessee: 18.0% (1,457)TN18.0%North Carolina: 3.0% (5,849)NC3.0%South Carolina: 9.8% (1,014)SC9.8%District of Columbia: 3.0% (1,050)DC3.0%Oklahoma: no dataOKLouisiana: 2.6% (2,284)LA2.6%Mississippi: 7.7% (895)MS7.7%Alabama: 3.0% (1,807)AL3.0%Georgia: 5.5% (6,259)GA5.5%Hawaii: 10.5% (4,131)HI10.5%Texas: 9.1% (17,515)TX9.1%Florida: 6.1% (10,400)FL6.1%
Show the data
Tile map of congressional delegations’ personal-attack rate by state, the current term: highest TN 18.0%, MA 12.9%, VT 11.9%; lowest LA 2.6%, IN 2.3%, KS 0.2%.
StatePersonal attacksStatementsFifth
Tennessee18.0%14575 of 5
Massachusetts12.9%186545 of 5
Vermont11.9%41195 of 5
Rhode Island11.7%122935 of 5
Connecticut10.8%129085 of 5
Hawaii10.5%41315 of 5
Colorado10.4%102215 of 5
South Carolina9.8%10145 of 5
Maryland9.6%130024 of 5
Illinois9.4%267804 of 5
Washington9.4%169124 of 5
Virginia9.3%159004 of 5
Texas9.1%175154 of 5
Wisconsin8.9%52804 of 5
New York8.4%324104 of 5
Arizona8.3%95424 of 5
Oregon8.0%118033 of 5
New Mexico7.7%90673 of 5
Mississippi7.7%8953 of 5
California7.7%576633 of 5
New Jersey7.3%199033 of 5
Delaware7.1%42023 of 5
Kentucky6.6%12543 of 5
Minnesota6.3%98493 of 5
Florida6.1%104002 of 5
Pennsylvania5.9%108952 of 5
Michigan5.9%127632 of 5
Georgia5.5%62592 of 5
Maine5.4%11362 of 5
Missouri5.4%35072 of 5
Ohio5.2%94742 of 5
Nevada4.7%121622 of 5
District of Columbia3.0%10501 of 5
Alabama3.0%18071 of 5
North Carolina3.0%58491 of 5
New Hampshire2.9%72881 of 5
Louisiana2.6%22841 of 5
Indiana2.3%14351 of 5
Kansas0.2%19661 of 5
AlaskaNo data——
ArkansasNo data——
IowaNo data——
IdahoNo data——
MontanaNo data——
North DakotaNo data——
NebraskaNo data——
OklahomaNo data——
South DakotaNo data——
UtahNo data——
West VirginiaNo data——
WyomingNo data——

Affective polarization by state

Own-party minus other-party thermometer rating, 0–100 · survey estimate as of Oct 27, 2026

Alaska: 47.4 (360)AK47.4Maine: 55.5 (510)ME55.5Vermont: 53.1 (230)VT53.1New Hampshire: 51.5 (456)NH51.5Washington: 52.5 (3,244)WA52.5Idaho: 50.3 (684)ID50.3Montana: 53.5 (431)MT53.5North Dakota: 51.2 (269)ND51.2Minnesota: 52.5 (2,116)MN52.5Illinois: 49.8 (5,019)IL49.8Wisconsin: 51.8 (2,502)WI51.8Michigan: 52.4 (3,821)MI52.4New York: 48.7 (9,106)NY48.7Rhode Island: 52.3 (327)RI52.3Massachusetts: 52.6 (1,928)MA52.6Oregon: 51.5 (2,259)OR51.5Nevada: 52.9 (1,723)NV52.9Wyoming: 53.4 (227)WY53.4South Dakota: 51.3 (397)SD51.3Iowa: 52.9 (1,219)IA52.9Indiana: 52.0 (2,423)IN52.0Ohio: 52.3 (5,062)OH52.3Pennsylvania: 51.8 (5,743)PA51.8New Jersey: 52.4 (3,197)NJ52.4Connecticut: 51.8 (1,102)CT51.8California: 50.7 (13,813)CA50.7Utah: 47.7 (1,053)UT47.7Colorado: 51.4 (2,192)CO51.4Nebraska: 51.2 (717)NE51.2Missouri: 51.7 (2,517)MO51.7Kentucky: 49.0 (1,802)KY49.0West Virginia: 50.3 (834)WV50.3Virginia: 53.0 (3,323)VA53.0Maryland: 49.3 (1,891)MD49.3Delaware: 49.4 (430)DE49.4Arizona: 52.5 (3,353)AZ52.5New Mexico: 51.9 (949)NM51.9Kansas: 50.0 (982)KS50.0Arkansas: 51.6 (1,088)AR51.6Tennessee: 51.8 (2,608)TN51.8North Carolina: 53.6 (3,673)NC53.6South Carolina: 52.2 (1,853)SC52.2District of Columbia: 50.7 (398)DC50.7Oklahoma: 49.2 (1,325)OK49.2Louisiana: 51.1 (1,346)LA51.1Mississippi: 52.0 (791)MS52.0Alabama: 52.8 (1,760)AL52.8Georgia: 51.4 (4,539)GA51.4Hawaii: 50.8 (398)HI50.8Texas: 51.6 (11,953)TX51.6Florida: 52.4 (10,075)FL52.4
Show the data
Tile map of the survey’s state estimate of affective polarization: highest ME 55.5, NC 53.6, MT 53.5; lowest NY 48.7, UT 47.7, AK 47.4 points.
StateAffective polarization (points)RespondentsFifth
Maine55.55105 of 5
North Carolina53.636735 of 5
Montana53.54315 of 5
Wyoming53.42275 of 5
Vermont53.12305 of 5
Virginia53.033235 of 5
Iowa52.912195 of 5
Nevada52.917235 of 5
Alabama52.817605 of 5
Massachusetts52.619285 of 5
Minnesota52.521165 of 5
Washington52.532444 of 5
Arizona52.533534 of 5
Michigan52.438214 of 5
Florida52.4100754 of 5
New Jersey52.431974 of 5
Rhode Island52.33274 of 5
Ohio52.350624 of 5
South Carolina52.218534 of 5
Mississippi52.07914 of 5
Indiana52.024234 of 5
New Mexico51.99493 of 5
Wisconsin51.825023 of 5
Pennsylvania51.857433 of 5
Connecticut51.811023 of 5
Tennessee51.826083 of 5
Missouri51.725173 of 5
Texas51.6119533 of 5
Arkansas51.610883 of 5
Oregon51.522593 of 5
New Hampshire51.54563 of 5
Georgia51.445392 of 5
Colorado51.421922 of 5
South Dakota51.33972 of 5
North Dakota51.22692 of 5
Nebraska51.27172 of 5
Louisiana51.113462 of 5
Hawaii50.83982 of 5
District of Columbia50.73982 of 5
California50.7138132 of 5
West Virginia50.38342 of 5
Idaho50.36841 of 5
Kansas50.09821 of 5
Illinois49.850191 of 5
Delaware49.44301 of 5
Maryland49.318911 of 5
Oklahoma49.213251 of 5
Kentucky49.018021 of 5
New York48.791061 of 5
Utah47.710531 of 5
Alaska47.43601 of 5
Show the 95% intervals
The survey’s state estimates of affective polarization with 95% intervals
StateEstimate95% intervalRespondents
Maine55.553.5–57.3510
North Carolina53.652.4–54.73673
Montana53.551.2–55.3431
Wyoming53.450.7–56.3227
Vermont53.149.9–55.5230
Virginia53.051.7–54.53323
Iowa52.951.4–54.61219
Nevada52.951.3–54.11723
Alabama52.851.0–54.61760
Massachusetts52.650.6–54.41928
Minnesota52.551.0–53.82116
Washington52.551.0–53.93244
Arizona52.551.2–53.73353
Michigan52.451.5–53.63821
Florida52.451.5–53.410075
New Jersey52.451.3–53.63197
Rhode Island52.350.3–54.8327
Ohio52.351.4–53.25062
South Carolina52.250.8–53.91853
Mississippi52.050.1–53.6791
Indiana52.050.6–53.22423
New Mexico51.949.9–53.8949
Wisconsin51.850.4–53.02502
Pennsylvania51.850.8–52.85743
Connecticut51.849.9–53.61102
Tennessee51.850.4–53.42608
Missouri51.750.3–53.12517
Texas51.650.7–52.511953
Arkansas51.649.5–53.61088
Oregon51.550.0–53.02259
New Hampshire51.549.3–53.2456
Georgia51.450.4–52.54539
Colorado51.449.9–52.82192
South Dakota51.349.2–53.6397
North Dakota51.248.6–53.6269
Nebraska51.249.4–53.0717
Louisiana51.149.8–52.61346
Hawaii50.848.2–53.2398
District of Columbia50.746.4–54.3398
California50.749.2–51.913813
West Virginia50.348.4–52.9834
Idaho50.348.1–52.6684
Kansas50.048.4–51.6982
Illinois49.848.4–51.05019
Delaware49.446.9–51.4430
Maryland49.347.0–51.21891
Oklahoma49.247.6–51.21325
Kentucky49.047.6–50.61802
New York48.747.6–49.89106
Utah47.745.9–49.41053
Alaska47.445.0–49.4360
Notes

Each map is cut at the quintiles of its own measure, so each shade holds about ten states. The correlation in the headline compares the two maps.

States whose officials made fewer than 100 statements in the window are hatched and excluded. The survey estimates come from a multilevel model fit to every wave (MRP), which also estimates small states. Most states fall within a few points of each other; the 95% intervals are in the table.

Back to topNext: Challengers

Challengers and incumbents

Incumbents post personal attacks more often than the challengers they face. On posts on X since Oct 1, 2025, the median challenger’s rate is 3.9% and the median incumbent’s 5.1%; 38 of 84 challengers post personal attacks more often than the incumbent they face and 45 less often, across 79 House and Senate races with both sides measured. The widest Senate gap is in Colorado, 7.8 points.

Every 2026 House and Senate race with an incumbent running and at least one challenger. A candidate’s rate is the share of their posts on X that the AI model labelled a personal attack. Both sides are measured over the same months, since Oct 1, 2025, and incumbents’ press releases, newsletters and floor speeches are excluded. Candidates with fewer than 10 posts are left out.

Incumbents and challengers

Personal attacks, share of posts on X · 79 incumbents, 84 challengers · rates above 20% are drawn at the edge

0%5%10%15%20%+Incumbentsmedian 5.1%Challengersmedian 3.9%
Show the data
Every candidate in the comparison
RaceCandidatePartyStatusPosts on XPersonal attacks
California 13th DistrictAdam GrayDemocratsIncumbent1000.0%
California 13th DistrictKevin Lincoln IIRepublicansChallenger2832.1%
California 17th DistrictRohit KhannaDemocratsIncumbent2791.4%
California 17th DistrictRitesh TandonRepublicansChallenger2208.2%
California 18th DistrictZoe LofgrenDemocratsIncumbent4898.4%
California 18th DistrictShane LewisRepublicansChallenger1660.0%
California 24th DistrictSalud CarbajalDemocratsIncumbent3955.6%
California 24th DistrictRobert SmithRepublicansChallenger1950.0%
California 25th DistrictRaul RuizDemocratsIncumbent3326.6%
California 25th DistrictJoe MalesRepublicansChallenger460.0%
California 31st DistrictGilbert CisnerosDemocratsIncumbent7196.7%
California 31st DistrictGilbert CisnerosDemocratsChallenger240.0%
California 32nd DistrictBrad ShermanDemocratsIncumbent4986.0%
California 32nd DistrictLarry ThompsonRepublicansChallenger1934.7%
California 34th DistrictJimmy GomezDemocratsIncumbent34419.5%
California 34th DistrictAngela Gonzales-TorresDemocratsChallenger1667.8%
California 35th DistrictNorma TorresDemocratsIncumbent5895.8%
California 35th DistrictMike CargileRepublicansChallenger9659.3%
California 36th DistrictTed LieuDemocratsIncumbent62111.3%
California 36th DistrictHouston BrignanoRepublicansChallenger2060.0%
California 4th DistrictMike ThompsonDemocratsIncumbent12671.2%
California 4th DistrictEric JonesDemocratsChallenger3041.3%
California 46th DistrictLou CorreaDemocratsIncumbent1800.0%
California 46th DistrictDavid PanRepublicansChallenger2550.0%
California 7th DistrictDoris MatsuiDemocratsIncumbent5608.4%
California 7th DistrictMai VangDemocratsChallenger1532.6%
California 8th DistrictJohn GaramendiDemocratsIncumbent43515.9%
California 8th DistrictRudy RecileRepublicansChallenger5641.1%
California 9th DistrictJosh HarderDemocratsIncumbent2770.4%
California 9th DistrictJohn McbrideRepublicansChallenger8374.1%
Colorado 1st DistrictDiana DegetteDemocratsIncumbent38411.2%
Colorado 1st DistrictMelat KirosDemocratsChallenger4363.4%
Colorado SenateJohn HickenlooperDemocratsIncumbent11347.8%
Colorado SenateMark BaisleyRepublicansChallenger780.0%
Connecticut 1st DistrictJohn LarsonDemocratsIncumbent140711.8%
Connecticut 1st DistrictLuke BroninDemocratsChallenger2486.5%
Connecticut 5th DistrictJahana HayesDemocratsIncumbent6240.2%
Connecticut 5th DistrictChris SheaRepublicansChallenger2667.1%
Delaware At-LargeSarah McbrideDemocratsIncumbent4286.1%
Delaware At-LargeLee MurphyRepublicansChallenger4230.9%
Delaware SenateChristopher CoonsDemocratsIncumbent6749.3%
Delaware SenateMichael KatzRepublicansChallenger323.1%
Florida 25th DistrictJared MoskowitzDemocratsIncumbent9826.6%
Florida 25th DistrictScott SingerRepublicansChallenger6112.6%
Florida 25th DistrictGeorge MoraitisRepublicansChallenger1601.3%
Georgia 13th DistrictDavid ScottDemocratsIncumbent419.8%
Georgia 13th DistrictJonathan ChavezRepublicansChallenger175.9%
Georgia 13th DistrictJasmine ClarkDemocratsChallenger5314.5%
Georgia SenateJon OssoffDemocratsIncumbent895.6%
Georgia SenateMichael Collins JrRepublicansChallenger15234.9%
Georgia SenateDerek DooleyRepublicansChallenger4862.7%
Illinois 1st DistrictJonathan JacksonDemocratsIncumbent4866.0%
Illinois 1st DistrictChristian MaxwellRepublicansChallenger54056.3%
Illinois 11th DistrictBill FosterDemocratsIncumbent4285.1%
Illinois 11th DistrictJeffrey WalterRepublicansChallenger9020.4%
Illinois 14th DistrictLauren UnderwoodDemocratsIncumbent1782.8%
Illinois 14th DistrictJames MarterRepublicansChallenger28712.9%
Illinois 17th DistrictEric SorensenDemocratsIncumbent5121.2%
Illinois 17th DistrictDillan VancilRepublicansChallenger147.1%
Illinois 3rd DistrictDelia RamirezDemocratsIncumbent144112.9%
Illinois 3rd DistrictAngel OakleyRepublicansChallenger1021.0%
Indiana 1st DistrictFrank MrvanDemocratsIncumbent2310.9%
Indiana 1st DistrictBarb RegnitzRepublicansChallenger1213.3%
Louisiana 6th DistrictCleo FieldsDemocratsIncumbent510.0%
Louisiana 6th DistrictLarry Davis IIIRepublicansChallenger634.8%
Massachusetts SenateEdward MarkeyDemocratsIncumbent122110.9%
Massachusetts SenateJohn DeatonRepublicansChallenger256010.0%
Maryland 6th DistrictApril DelaneyDemocratsIncumbent7007.0%
Maryland 6th DistrictRobin FickerRepublicansChallenger1164.3%
Maryland 8th DistrictJamie RaskinDemocratsIncumbent56015.4%
Maryland 8th DistrictCheryl RileyRepublicansChallenger113711.8%
Maine 1st DistrictChellie PingreeDemocratsIncumbent15913.2%
Maine 1st DistrictRonald RussellRepublicansChallenger614.9%
Michigan 13th DistrictShri ThanedarDemocratsIncumbent134722.0%
Michigan 13th DistrictDonavan MckinneyDemocratsChallenger3523.1%
Minnesota 3rd DistrictKelly MorrisonDemocratsIncumbent6226.9%
Minnesota 3rd DistrictTyler BassRepublicansChallenger13814.5%
Minnesota 5th DistrictIlhan OmarDemocratsIncumbent4125.1%
Minnesota 5th DistrictJohn NagelRepublicansChallenger460012.2%
Mississippi 2nd DistrictBennie ThompsonDemocratsIncumbent3149.9%
Mississippi 2nd DistrictRon EllerRepublicansChallenger1633.1%
North Carolina 1st DistrictDon DavisDemocratsIncumbent10340.0%
North Carolina 1st DistrictLaurie BuckhoutRepublicansChallenger5536.2%
North Carolina 12th DistrictAlma AdamsDemocratsIncumbent1163.5%
North Carolina 12th DistrictJohn CodigaRepublicansChallenger1224.1%
North Carolina 2nd DistrictDeborah RossDemocratsIncumbent6095.9%
North Carolina 2nd DistrictEugene DouglassRepublicansChallenger527824.1%
North Carolina 4th DistrictValerie FousheeDemocratsIncumbent6924.2%
North Carolina 4th DistrictNida AllamDemocratsChallenger2012.5%
New Hampshire 1st DistrictChris PappasDemocratsIncumbent8880.8%
New Hampshire 1st DistrictStefany ShaheenDemocratsChallenger8594.4%
New Hampshire 1st DistrictAnthony DilorenzoRepublicansChallenger3572.2%
New Hampshire 2nd DistrictMaggie GoodlanderDemocratsIncumbent7961.9%
New Hampshire 2nd DistrictLily WilliamsRepublicansChallenger36592.6%
New Jersey 11th DistrictMikie SherrillDemocratsIncumbent4153.6%
New Jersey 11th DistrictJoe HathawayRepublicansChallenger7713.5%
New Jersey 11th DistrictAnalilia MejiaDemocratsChallenger8162.3%
New Jersey 3rd DistrictHerb ConawayDemocratsIncumbent14712.2%
New Jersey 3rd DistrictMichael McguireRepublicansChallenger3626.9%
New Jersey 5th DistrictJosh GottheimerDemocratsIncumbent13941.6%
New Jersey 5th DistrictSean KirraneRepublicansChallenger1603.8%
New Jersey 6th DistrictFrank Pallone JrDemocratsIncumbent169412.3%
New Jersey 6th DistrictHillary HerzigRepublicansChallenger9448.2%
New Jersey 9th DistrictNelida PouDemocratsIncumbent8774.2%
New Jersey 9th DistrictRosemary PinoRepublicansChallenger1751.1%
New Jersey SenateCory BookerDemocratsIncumbent4375.9%
New Jersey SenateJustin MurphyRepublicansChallenger5714.4%
New Mexico 1st DistrictMelanie StansburyDemocratsIncumbent13495.7%
New Mexico 1st DistrictNdidiamaka OkparekeRepublicansChallenger922.2%
New Mexico 2nd DistrictGabriel VasquezDemocratsIncumbent4290.9%
New Mexico 2nd DistrictGreg CunninghamRepublicansChallenger4151.9%
New Mexico 3rd DistrictTeresa Leger FernandezDemocratsIncumbent6377.2%
New Mexico 3rd DistrictMartin ZamoraRepublicansChallenger621.6%
Nevada 1st DistrictDina TitusDemocratsIncumbent13543.2%
Nevada 1st DistrictCarrie BuckRepublicansChallenger2405.8%
Nevada 3rd DistrictSusie LeeDemocratsIncumbent7950.8%
Nevada 3rd DistrictMarty O'DonnellRepublicansChallenger9339.4%
Nevada 4th DistrictSteven HorsfordDemocratsIncumbent15040.3%
Nevada 4th DistrictCody WhippleRepublicansChallenger1532.0%
New York 10th DistrictDaniel GoldmanDemocratsIncumbent91414.5%
New York 10th DistrictBrad LanderDemocratsChallenger10364.7%
New York 13th DistrictAdriano EspaillatDemocratsIncumbent11652.3%
New York 13th DistrictDarializa Avila ChevalierDemocratsChallenger3673.5%
New York 14th DistrictAlexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocratsIncumbent1812.8%
New York 14th DistrictDiamant HysenajRepublicansChallenger2065.8%
New York 19th DistrictJosh RileyDemocratsIncumbent5660.2%
New York 19th DistrictPeter Oberacker JrRepublicansChallenger7615.5%
New York 3rd DistrictThomas SuozziDemocratsIncumbent10590.9%
New York 3rd DistrictMike LipetriRepublicansChallenger45513.2%
New York 9th DistrictYvette ClarkeDemocratsIncumbent39714.1%
New York 9th DistrictJoel Anabilah-AzumahRepublicansChallenger12255.3%
Ohio 1st DistrictGreg LandsmanDemocratsIncumbent10413.8%
Ohio 1st DistrictEric ConroyRepublicansChallenger2435.3%
Ohio 13th DistrictEmilia SykesDemocratsIncumbent6210.2%
Ohio 13th DistrictCarey ColemanRepublicansChallenger702.9%
Ohio 9th DistrictMarcy KapturDemocratsIncumbent6601.4%
Ohio 9th DistrictDerek MerrinRepublicansChallenger1944.1%
Oregon 4th DistrictValerie HoyleDemocratsIncumbent4042.7%
Oregon 4th DistrictMonique DespainRepublicansChallenger4005.8%
Oregon 5th DistrictJanelle BynumDemocratsIncumbent7282.9%
Oregon 5th DistrictPatti AdairRepublicansChallenger2832.1%
Pennsylvania 12th DistrictSummer LeeDemocratsIncumbent6084.1%
Pennsylvania 12th DistrictJames HayesRepublicansChallenger5432.8%
Rhode Island 2nd DistrictSeth MagazinerDemocratsIncumbent11581.8%
Rhode Island 2nd DistrictVictor MellorRepublicansChallenger11372.0%
Rhode Island SenateJohn ReedDemocratsIncumbent6444.3%
Rhode Island SenateRaymond MckayRepublicansChallenger676.0%
Tennessee 9th DistrictSteve CohenDemocratsIncumbent45817.5%
Tennessee 9th DistrictJustin PearsonDemocratsChallenger4234.0%
Texas 20th DistrictJoaquin CastroDemocratsIncumbent4617.6%
Texas 20th DistrictEdgardo BaezRepublicansChallenger11275.1%
Texas 28th DistrictHenry CuellarDemocratsIncumbent12570.2%
Texas 28th DistrictTano TijerinaRepublicansChallenger10610.4%
Texas 34th DistrictVicente GonzalezDemocratsIncumbent6030.7%
Texas 34th DistrictEric FloresRepublicansChallenger3833.4%
Texas 7th DistrictElizabeth FletcherDemocratsIncumbent7551.3%
Texas 7th DistrictAlexander HaleRepublicansChallenger1240.8%
Virginia 7th DistrictYevgeny VindmanDemocratsIncumbent11524.1%
Virginia 7th DistrictDouglas OllivantRepublicansChallenger531.9%
Virginia 8th DistrictDonald Beyer Jr.DemocratsIncumbent115016.3%
Virginia 8th DistrictTony SabioRepublicansChallenger6652.7%
Washington 3rd DistrictMarie Gluesenkamp PerezDemocratsIncumbent2370.8%
Washington 3rd DistrictJohn BraunRepublicansChallenger3961.5%

Both are measured on posts on X since Oct 1, 2025.

Five Senate races with the widest gaps

Each incumbent (outlined) and the challenger whose rate differs most, personal attacks as a share of posts on X

Colorado Senate

John Hickenlooper (D), 1,134 posts · Mark Baisley (R), 78 posts

Delaware Senate

Christopher Coons (D), 674 posts · Michael Katz (R), 32 posts

Georgia Senate

Jon Ossoff (D), 89 posts · Derek Dooley (R), 486 posts

Rhode Island Senate

John Reed (D), 644 posts · Raymond Mckay (R), 67 posts

New Jersey Senate

Cory Booker (D), 437 posts · Justin Murphy (R), 571 posts

Show the data
The races shown, incumbent and challenger
RaceIncumbentRatePostsChallengerRatePostsGap (points)
Colorado SenateJohn Hickenlooper (Democrat)7.8%1134Mark Baisley (Republican)0.0%78−7.8
Delaware SenateChristopher Coons (Democrat)9.3%674Michael Katz (Republican)3.1%32−6.2
Georgia SenateJon Ossoff (Democrat)5.6%89Derek Dooley (Republican)2.7%486−2.9
Rhode Island SenateJohn Reed (Democrat)4.3%644Raymond Mckay (Republican)6.0%67+1.6
New Jersey SenateCory Booker (Democrat)5.9%437Justin Murphy (Republican)4.4%571−1.6

Back to top