Skip to content

2026 midterms · Candidate

Democrat · Candidate · U.S. House, North Carolina’s 13th District · Challenger

Portrait of Paul Barringer, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
72%
of statements discuss policy

The highest of 139 Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates (their average is 40%; Barringer ranks 1st of 139, where 1st is the highest rate), from 971 statements.

An AI model reads each of Barringer’s posts on X and marks whether each discusses a specific policy; the rate is the share marked.

What Barringer says

72% of Barringer’s statements discuss policy, the highest of 139 Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates. Their average is 40%.

An AI model reads Barringer’s posts on X and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 139 Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Barringer among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How often does Barringer make each kind of statement?

Share of statements: Barringer (thick bar) against the Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates average (thin grey bar)

0%80%
Barringer
Average
Rank
Personal attacks
0.9%
5.3%
120th of 139
Policy criticism
27%
14%
13th of 139
Policy discussion
72%
40%
1st of 139
Bipartisanship
4.8%
2.4%
19th of 139
Credit claiming
32%
9.3%
3rd of 139
Show the data
Barringer’s share of statements of each kind, against the Democratic House challengers and open-seat candidates average: Personal attacks 0.9%, Policy criticism 27%, Policy discussion 72%, Bipartisanship 4.8%, Credit claiming 32%.
RowBarringerAverage
Personal attacks0.9%5.3%
Policy criticism27%14%
Policy discussion72%40%
Bipartisanship4.8%2.4%
Credit claiming32%9.3%
971

statements classified

From their posts on X.

This compares Barringer with other candidates. Barringer’s official profile compares Barringer with fellow office-holders and has every statement, vote and bill.

The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Barringer reports $1.2M raised and $409.5K cash on hand. No other candidate on this race’s list has FEC figures to compare.

Totals the campaign reports to the Federal Election Commission for the 2026 cycle, as filed.

Raised

$1.2M

Spent

$805.6K

Cash on hand

$409.5K

Where has Barringer’s money come from?

Receipts by source, as reported to the FEC

Individuals: $727.7K (59.9%)Individuals $727.7KPACs: $10.0K (0.8%)Party committees: $6,213 (0.5%)Own money: $150.9K (12.4%)Candidate loans: $320.0K (26.3%)Candidate loans $320.0K
Show the data
Barringer’s receipts by source: Individuals $727.7K, PACs $10.0K, Party committees $6,213, Own money $150.9K, Candidate loans $320.0K.
PartValue
Individuals$727.7K
PACs$10.0K
Party committees$6,213
Own money$150.9K
Candidate loans$320.0K
Notes
Sources are the FEC’s categories; what is left (transfers, refunds, other receipts) is not drawn. The race page compares every candidate in the race.

Back to topNext: Online

Online

Barringer’s posts on X from Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. Followers and the average likes and views per post, from the posts the lab has collected.

Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.

Followers

Not on file

Likes per post

288

Views per post

13.2K

Back to topNext: The race

The race

North Carolina 13th District: Barringer advanced from the primary. Primary Mar 3, 2026, runoff Apr 14, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.

This race is not among the races the lab lists as rated toss-up or leaning.

Who else is on the list?

Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary

No other candidate is listed for this race.

The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in North Carolina

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.

The statements. This candidate is measured on the posts on X the lab collects for the campaign. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.

The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Identifiers. FEC candidate id H6NC13228 (FEC record). Bioguide id H001101. First FEC filing May 22, 2025.

Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected, the latest from Oct 23, 2026.

About the data →

Back to top