Skip to content

2026 midterms · Candidate

Democrat · Candidate · Governor of Hawaii · Incumbent

Portrait of Josh Green, rendered as a two-tone print
Official portrait
86%
of statements discuss policy

The highest of 34 Democratic candidates for governor (their average is 47%; Green ranks 1st of 34, where 1st is the highest rate), from 76 statements.

An AI model reads each of Green’s posts on X and marks whether each discusses a specific policy; the rate is the share marked.

What Green says

86% of Green’s statements discuss policy, the highest of 34 Democratic candidates for governor. Their average is 47%.

An AI model reads Green’s posts on X and marks five kinds of statement; the rate is the share of statements with each label. The thin grey bar is the average of the 34 Democratic candidates for governor with 50 or more statements, and the rank places Green among them (1st is the highest rate). A rate describes what was said, not whether it was right.

How often does Green make each kind of statement?

Share of statements: Green (thick bar) against the Democratic candidates for governor average (thin grey bar)

0%90%
Green
Average
Rank
Personal attacks
0%
3.9%
33rd of 34
Policy criticism
5.3%
16%
33rd of 34
Policy discussion
86%
47%
1st of 34
Bipartisanship
1.3%
3.8%
29th of 34
Credit claiming
39%
18%
4th of 34
Show the data
Green’s share of statements of each kind, against the Democratic candidates for governor average: Personal attacks 0%, Policy criticism 5.3%, Policy discussion 86%, Bipartisanship 1.3%, Credit claiming 39%.
RowGreenAverage
Personal attacks0%3.9%
Policy criticism5.3%16%
Policy discussion86%47%
Bipartisanship1.3%3.8%
Credit claiming39%18%
76

statements classified

From their posts on X.

Awards

  • Accomplishments LeaderTop 3% in credit claiming among all ranked candidates, the lab’s rule.
  • Policy Discussion LeaderTop 3% in policy discussion among all ranked candidates, the lab’s rule.
  • Most Civil CandidateBottom 3% in personal attacks among all ranked candidates, the lab’s rule.
  • Zero Personal AttacksNo statement marked as a personal attack, with 50 or more statements, the lab’s rule.

This compares Green with other candidates. Green’s official profile compares Green with fellow office-holders and has every statement, vote and bill.

The five kinds of statement

Personal attacks. Overtly questions a named person’s character, integrity or loyalty, or calls them names. Criticising a record or a policy does not count.

Policy criticism. Objects to a specific policy, law or court ruling with fact-based arguments, without personal attacks or emotional appeals.

Policy discussion. Discusses a specific public policy or policy area (health care, taxes, defense, …).

Bipartisanship. Emphasises working across the aisle, compromise or common ground between the parties.

Credit claiming. Claims credit for passing legislation, securing funding or grants, or other accomplishments in office.

Back to topNext: Money

Money

Candidates for governor report to their state, not to the Federal Election Commission.

No campaign-finance figures are on file for candidates for governor.

Back to topNext: Online

Online

Green’s posts on X from Jan 7, 2025 to Oct 26, 2026. Followers and the average likes and views per post, from the posts the lab has collected.

Engagement is what X reports for each collected post, averaged; it measures reach, not support.

Followers

Not on file

Likes per post

2

Views per post

247

Back to topNext: The race

The race

Hawaii Governor: Green advanced from the primary. Primary Aug 8, 2026. General election Nov 3, 2026.

Rated solid democratic. Cook Political Report ratings, entered by the lab (last updated by the lab on Jun 24, 2026); a forecaster’s judgement about the general election, not the lab’s.

Who else is on the list?

Candidates recorded as advancing from the primary

The race page compares every candidate’s statements and money · every race in Hawaii

Back to topNext: Methods and sources

Methods and sources

The headline. Each candidate’s headline is chosen by one rule for everyone. The peer group is the ranked candidates (50 or more statements) of the same party, for the same office and measured on the same record, widened to both parties when it has fewer than 10. Each kind of statement is scored by how far the candidate sits from the middle of the group (|percentile − 0.5|, ties counting half); the farthest leads if it is outside the middle half (above 0.25), scores within 0.03 tie and fall to a fixed order, and a high rate backed by fewer than 10 labelled statements cannot lead. Otherwise the headline is a plain count.

The statements. This candidate is measured on the posts on X the lab collects for the campaign. An AI model marks each statement for five kinds of statement; rates are shown from 10 statements and ranked from 50.

The race. Candidates come from FEC filings (House and Senate), the lab’s list of sitting members of Congress, and the lab’s list of candidates for governor. The lab records each primary’s result once it is official. House districts follow FEC filings; a sitting member is placed in the race for the seat they hold now.

Identifiers. The lab’s governor id HI-josh-green.

Money and reach. Campaign money is as reported to the FEC. Followers, likes and views are what X reports for the posts the lab collected, the latest from Oct 26, 2026.

About the data →

Back to top